Defining Social Work: Does the Working Definition Work Today?

Abstract

The components of the working definition's constellation that makes up social work practice are examined. This article suggests that the working definition, as stated, is not appropriate today. It is suggested that it is not the knowledge and methods of social work practice but the values and purpose underlying social work that define it. It is emphasized that the definition of social work should be inclusive of different attitudes and opinions, yet limited, avoiding the incorporation of other problem issues. Furthermore, it is suggested that the definition, if inclusively stated, can remain constant through time and environment. It is also suggested that alternatives have been offered that may be more appropriate in the current environment of global awareness and sensitivity. More inclusive statements, although allowing for growth and change in the profession, do not necessitate change in the definition itself.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Australian Association of Social Workers. (1999). Code of ethics. Barton, Australian Capitol Territory: Author.

Bartlett, H. M. (1958). Toward clarification and improvement of social work practice. Social Work, 3(2), 3-9.

British Association of Social Workers. (1996). The code of ethics for social work. Birmingham, UK: Author.

Flexner, A. (1915). Is social work a profession? In Proceedings of the National Conference of Charities and Corrections (pp. 576-590). Chicago: Hildmann Printing.

Gibelman, M. (1999). The search for identity: Defining social work—Past, present, future. Social Work, 44, 298-310.

Gordon, W. E. (1962). A critique of the working definition. Social Work, 7(4), 3-13.

International Federation of Social Workers. (2000). New definition of social work. Berne: Author.

National Association of Social Workers. (1996). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author.