Objective: This randomized trial explores whether client responses to a structured interview differed when the interview was administered using a paper instrument or a computer. Method: 100 clients in substance abuse treatment were randomly assigned to undergo a comprehensive clinical assessment by either standard pencil-and-paper interview or computer-assisted interview. The reported use of drugs and incidence of drug-related problems were compared across the two types of administration using ANOVA, independent sample t tests, and chi-square statistics. The difference in the effect of the computerized interview on clients with and without pending legal issues was also evaluated. Results: In general, clients provided the same responses to standard pencil-and-paper interviews and computer-assisted interviews. Having pending legal issues did not affect the client’s sensitivity to the computer-assisted interview. Conclusion: We found no evidence that the use of computerized clinical assessments by social work practitioners compromises the validity of client responses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J. E.
, & Davidoff, D. A. (1990). Psychological testing, computers and aging. International Journal of Technology & Aging, 3, 47-56.
2.
Ball, J. D.
, & Archer, R. P. (1994). Time requirements of psychological testing: A survey of practitioners. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 239-249.
3.
Block, R. I.
, & Ghoneim, M. D. (1998). Effects of chronic drug use on cognition. Unpublished manuscript, University of Iowa.
4.
Campbell, D. T.
, & Stanley, J. C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
5.
Carr, A. C.
, & Ghosh, A. (1983). Response of phobic patients to direct computer assessments. British Journal of Psychiatry, 142, 60-65.
6.
Carr, A. C.
, Ghosh, A., & Ancill, R. J. (1983). Can a computer take a psychiatric history?Psychological Medicine, 13, 151-158.
7.
Davis, L. J.
, Hoffman, N. G., Morse, R. M., & Luehr, J. G. (1992). Substance use disorder diagnostic schedule (SUDDS): The equivalence and validity of a computer-administered and an interviewer-administered format. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 16, 250-254.
8.
Davis, L. J.
, & Morse, R. M. (1992). Self-administered alcoholism screening test: A comparison of conventional versus computer-administered formats. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 15, 155-157.
9.
Farrell, A. D.
(1991). Computers and behavioral assessment: Current applications, future possibilities, and obstacles to routine use. Behavior Assessment, 13, 159-179.
10.
Greist, J. H.
, & Klein, M. H. (1980). Computer programs for patients, clinicians, and research in psychiatry. In J. B. Sidowski, J. H. Johnson, & T. A. Williams (Eds.), Technology in mental health care delivery systems (pp. 163-181). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Halberg, K. J.
, Duncan, L. E., Mitchell, N. Z., Hendrick, F. T., & Jones, D. B. (1986). Use of computers in assessment: A potential solution to the documentation dilemma of the activities coordinator. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 8, 69-80.
12.
Hall, J. A.
, Vaughan Sarrazin, M. S., Vaughn, T., Block, B., & Schut, A. (1999). Iowa case management for rural drug abuse: Preliminary results. Care Management Journals, 1(4), 232-243.
13.
Hansen, J. C.
(1986). Computers and beyond in the career decision-making process. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development, 19, 48-52.
14.
Lapham, S. C.
, Henley, E., & Kleyboecker, K. (1993). Prenatal behavioral risk screening by computer among Native Americans. Family Medicine, 25, 197-202.
15.
Lewis, G.
(1993). Computers in primary care. International Review of Psychiatry, 4, 307-310.
16.
Lewis, G.
, Pelosi, A. J., Glover, E., Wilkinson, G., Stansfeld, S. A., Williams, P., et al. (1988). The development of a computerized assessment for minor psychiatric disorder. Psychological Medicine, 18, 737-745.
17.
Lipsey, M. W.
(1990). Design sensitivity: Statistical power for experimental research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Lucas, R. W.
, Mullin, P. J., Luna, C. B., & McInroy, D. C. (1977). Psychiatrist and a computer as interrogators of patients with alcohol related illnesses: A comparison. British Journal of Psychiatry, 131, 160-167.
19.
Marcus, S.
, Robins, L., & Bucholz, K. (1991). Quick Diagnostic Interview Schedule III-R. St. Louis, MO: Washington University School of Medicine.
20.
McLellan, A. T.
, Kushner, H., Metzger, D., Peters, R., Smith, I., Grissom, G., et al. (1992). The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 9, 19-213.
21.
McLellan, A. T.
, Luborsky, L., Cacciola, J., Griffith, J., Evans, F., Barr, H., et al. (1985). New data from the Addiction Severity Index: Reliability and validity in three centers. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 173, 412-423.
22.
McLellan, A. T.
, Luborsky, L., Woody, G. E., & O’Brien, C. P. (1980). An improved diagnostic evaluation instrument for substance abuse patients: The Addiction Severity Index. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 168, 26-33.
23.
National Computer Systems, Inc.
(1996). Microtest-Q system software. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Assessments.
24.
National Institute on Drug Abuse
. (1993). Assessing client needs using the ASI: Resource manual (NIH Publication No. 93-3620). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
25.
Nurius, P. S.
, & Hudson, W. W. (1989). Computers and social diagnosis: The client’s perspective. Computers in Human Services, 5(1-2), 21-35.
26.
Orion Healthcare Technology
. (1999). Adult ASI suite. Omaha, NE: Accurate Assessments.
27.
Pardeck, J. T.
, & Schulte, R. S. (1990). Computers in social intervention: Implications for professional social work practice and education. Family Therapy, 17, 109-121.
28.
Skinner, H. A.
, & Allen, B. A. (1983). Does the computer make a difference? Computerized versus face to face versus self-report assessment of alcohol, drug, and tobacco use. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51, 267-275.
29.
Slack, W. V.
, Hicks, G. P., Reed, C. E., & Van Cura, L. J. (1966). A computer based medical history system. New England Journal of Medicine, 274, 194-198.
30.
Waldron, J. A.
(1984). ASH Plus software. Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
31.
Wilkinson, G.
, & Markus, A. C. (1989). Validation of a computerized assessment (PROQSY) of minor psychological morbidity by relation operating characteristic analysis using a single GP’s assessments as criterion measures. Psychological Medicine, 19, 225-231.
