Objective: The purpose of this study was to: (a) investigate the level of moral reasoning of female batterers beginning court-mandated treatment, (b) investigate whether the current standardized treatment program was effective in altering the level of moral reasoning of female batterers, and (c) determine if there was an association between level of moral reasoning and recidivism at 2 years following treatment completion. Method: The study employed a nonequivalent control group design in examining the moral reasoning level of 91 women court ordered into a standard group treatment program for domestic violence offenders. Results: Analysis of the pretest data indicated that the entire sample of batterers was employing a level of moral reasoning two standard deviations lower than adults in general. Additionally, analysis of the posttest data demonstrated that there was no significant increase in moral reasoning at the conclusion of the treatment program, indicating that the current treatment program was ineffective in influencing moral reasoning. Women were monitored for a period of 2 years following treatment completion and a low positive correlation was found (r = .32) between level of moral reasoning and rearrest. Conclusion: Implications of the findings for enhancing intervention efforts with court-ordered, female batterers were explored and discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blasi, A.
(1980). Bridging moral cognition and moral action: A critical review of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 1-45.
2.
Browne, A.
(1993). Violence against women by male partners: Prevalence, outcomes, and policy implications. American Psychologist, 48, 1077-1087.
3.
Butell, F.
(1998). Exploring the relationship between moral development and domestic violence. Family Violence and Sexual Assault Bulletin, 14, 11-15.
4.
Buttell, F.
(1999a). Level of moral reasoning among African-American and Caucasian domestic violence offenders prior to targeted professional intervention. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 30, 95-106.
5.
Buttell, F.
(1999b). Moral development among court-ordered domestic violence offenders: A descriptive analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 26, 37-52.
6.
Buttell, F.
(2001). Moral development among court-ordered batterers: Evaluating the impact of treatment. Research on Social Work Practice, 11, 93-107.
7.
Campbell, D.
, & Stanley, J. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
8.
Carden, A.
(1994). Wife abuse and the wife abuser: Review and recommendations. Counseling Psychologist, 22, 539-582.
9.
Deavers, L.
(1998). Domestic violence intervention program. Tuscaloosa, AL: Family Counseling Service.
10.
DeWolfe, T.
, Jackson, L., & Winterberger, P. (1988). A comparison of moral reasoning and moral character in male and female incarcerated felons. Sex Roles, 18, 583-593.
11.
Fiebert, M.
, & Gonzalez, D. (1997). College women who initiate assaults on their male partners and the reasons offered for such behavior. Psychological Reports, 80, 583-590.
12.
Gilligan, C.
(1977). In a different voice: Women’s conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 47, 481-517.
13.
Gilligan, C.
(1982). In a different voice: Psychology theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Gondolf, E.
(1997). Batterer programs: What we know and need to know. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 83-98.
15.
Hamberger, K.
(1997). Female offenders in domestic violence: A look at actions in their context. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 1, 117-129.
16.
Hamberger, K.
, & Potente, T. (1994). Counseling heterosexual women arrested for domestic violence: Implications for theory and practice. Violence and Victims, 9, 125-137.
17.
Hinkle, D.
, Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. (1994). Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
Jennings, W.
, Kilkenny, R., & Kohlberg, L. (1983). Moral-developmental theory and practice for youthful and adult offenders. In W. S. Laufer & J. M. Day (Eds.), Personality, theory, moral development and criminal behavior (pp. 281-355). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
19.
Jurkovic, G.
(1980). The juvenile delinquent as a moral philosopher: A structural-developmental perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 709-727.
20.
Kohlberg, L.
(1976). Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive-developmental approach. In T. Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 31-53). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
21.
Kohlberg, L.
(1981). The psychology of moral development (Vol. 1). San Francisco: Harper and Row.
22.
Kohlberg, L.
(1984). The psychology of moral development (Vol. 2). San Francisco: Harper and Row.
23.
Kohlberg, L.
, & Candee, D. (1984). The relationship of moral judgement to moral action. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gewirtz (Eds.), Morality, moral behavior and moral development (pp. 41-51). New York: John Wiley.
24.
Ma, H.
(1989). Moral orientation and moral judgement in adolescents in Hong Kong, Mainland China, and England. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 152-177.
25.
Macchietto, J.
(1992). Aspects of male victimization and female aggression: Implications for counseling men. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 14, 375-392.
26.
MacPhail, D.
(1989). The moral education approach in treating adult inmates. Criminal Justice & Behavior, 16, 81-97.
27.
Martin, M.
(1997). Double your trouble: Dual arrest in family violence. Journal of Family Violence, 12, 139-157.
28.
McNeely, R.
, & Robinson-Simpson, G. (1987). The truth about domestic violence: A falsely framed issue. Social Work, 32, 485-490.
29.
Moore, K.
, Greenfield, W., Wilson, M., & Kok, A. (1997). Toward a taxonomy of batterers. Families in Societies: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 78, 352-359.
30.
Morse, B.
(1995). Beyond the Conflict Tactics Scale: Assessing gender differences in partner violence. Violence and Victims, 10, 251-272.
31.
Nisan, M.
, & Kohlberg, L. (1982). Universality and cross-cultural variation in moral development: A longitudinal and cross-sectional study in Turkey. Child Development, 53, 865-876.
32.
Pagelow, M.
(1992). Adult victims of domestic violence: Battered women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 7, 87-120.
33.
Rest, J.
(1979). Development in judging moral issues. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
Rest, J.
(1986). Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.
35.
Rest, J.
(1993). Guide for defining issues test. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
36.
Rest, J.
, & Navarez, D. (1994). Moral development in the professions. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
37.
Snarey, J.
(1985). Cross-cultural universality of social-moral development: A critical review of Kohlberg’s research. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 202-232.
38.
Snarey, J.
, Reimer, J., & Kohlberg, L. (1985). Development of socio-moral reasoning among Kibbutz adolescents: A longitudinal cross-cultural study. Developmental Psychology, 21, 3-17.
39.
Straus, M.
(1993). Physical assaults by wives: A major social problem. In R. J. Gelles & D. R. Loseke (Eds.), Current controversies in family violence (pp. 207-231). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Straus, M.
, & Gelles, R. (1990). Physical violence in American families. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
41.
Thoma, S.
(1984). Do moral education programs facilitate moral judgement? A meta-analysis of studies using the Defining Issues Test. Moral Education Forum, 9, 20-24.
42.
Thoma, S.
(1986). Estimating gender differences in the comprehension and preference of moral issues. Developmental Review, 6, 165-180.
43.
Walker, L.
(1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55, 677-691.
44.
Walker, L.
(1994). Sexism in Kohlberg’s moral psychology? In B. Puka (Ed.), Caring voices and women’s moral frames: Gilligan’s view. Moral development: A compendium (pp. 327-341). New York: Garland.
45.
Woods, C.
(1996). Gender differences in moral development and acquisition: A review of Kohlberg’s and Gilligan’s models of justice and care. Social Behavior and Personality, 24, 375-384.
