Kolb’s Learning Style Inventory (LSI) is a very popular assessment tool despite compelling arguments against its use. Provided is a summary of the salient issues concerning the LSI. Arguments against its use, including suspect methodology, misapplication of statistical procedures, logical inconsistencies in theory construction, and a general lack of support for reliability and validity are examined. In addition, current research studies supporting its continued popularity are presented. The authors conclude that it is important for social work researchers, educators, and practitioners to examine the psychometric properties of any instrument prior to making decisions based on unsubstantiated findings.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbey, D., Hunt, D., & Weiser, J. (1985). Variation on a theme by Kolb: A new perspective for understanding counseling and supervision. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 477-497.
2.
Browne, D. (1986). Learning styles and Native American information analysis. Reproductions available through EDRS.
3.
Carmines, E., & Zeller, R. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4.
Coker, C. (1995). Learning style consistency across cognitive and motor settings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81, 1023-1026.
5.
Cornwell, J., & Manfredo, P. (1994). Kolb’s learning style theory revisited. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 317-327.
6.
Cornwell, J., Manfredo, P., & Dunlap, W. (1991). Factor analysis of the 1985 revision of the Kolb’s learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 51, 455-462.
7.
Davis, C. A. (1984). An approach to resolving issues in the workplace: A study of cognitive styles as a variable in the person-work environment fit of social work majors graduated from the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, 1970-1980 (Kentucky). Doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville, 1984. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 0452.
8.
Dawson, B. G. (1987). Assessing growth in undergraduate social work field education: Applications of Perry’s scheme of intellectual and ethical growth and Kolb’s experiential learning theory. Doctoral dissertation, Memphis State University, 1986. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 4299.
9.
Dunn, R., Dunn, K., & Price, G. E. (1975). Learning style inventory manual. Lawrence, KS: Price Systems.
10.
Emmanuel, R., & Potter, W. (1992). Do students’ style preferences differ by grade level, orientation toward college, and academic major?Research in Higher Education, 33, 395-414.
11.
Enns, C. (1993). Integrating separate and connected knowing: The experiential learning model. Teaching Psychology, 20, 7-12.
12.
Entwistle, N. J., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
13.
Epstein, B. N. (1996). The relationship of student-field instructor cognitive style matching to field instructor ratings of student performance in the practicum setting (learning). Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, 1996. Dissertation Abstracts International, 57, 1845.
14.
Ferrell, B. (1983). A factor analytic comparison of four learning-styles instruments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 33-39.
15.
Gardner, H. (1996). Probing more deeply into the theory of multiple intelligences. NASSP Bulletin, 80, 583-588.
16.
Geiger, M., Boyle, E., & Pinto, J. (1992). A factor analysis of Kolb’s revised learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 753-759.
17.
Geiger, M., Boyle, E., & Pinto, J. (1993). An examination of the ipsative and normative versions of Kolb’s revised learning style inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 717-725.
18.
Green, D., & Parker, R. (1989). Vocational and academic attributes of students with different learning styles. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 395-400.
19.
Hopkins, R. (1993). David Kolb’s experiential learning machine. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 24, 46-62.
20.
Houle, T. D. (1984). Stability and variation in undergraduate social work student learning styles. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Dakota, 1983. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 2686.
21.
Hudak, M., & Anderson, D. (1990). Formal operations and learning style predict success in statistics and computer science courses. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 231-234.
22.
Hunsaker, J. (1980). The experiential learning model and the learning style inventory: An assessment of current findings. Journal of Experiential Learning and Simulation, 2, 145-152.
23.
Katz, N., & Heimann, N. (1991). Learning styles of students and practitioners in five health professions. Occupational Therapy Journal of Research, 11, 238-244.
24.
Kolb, D. (1976). Learning style inventory. Boston: McBer and Company.
25.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Kruzich, J., Friesen, B., & Van Soest, D. (1986). The assessment of student and faculty learning styles: Research and application. Journal of Social Work Education, 22, 22-30.
27.
Loo, R. (1999). Confirmatory factor analysis of Kolb’s learning style inventory (LSI-1985). British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 213-219.
28.
Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two “quick-and-easy” methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299-312.
29.
Noi, L., & Chi-Ching, Y. (1994). Learning styles and their implications for cross cultural management in Singapore. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 593-600.
30.
Philbin, M., Meier, E., Huffman, S., & Boverie, P. (1995). A survey of gender and learning styles. Sex Roles, 32, 485-493.
31.
Piette, M. (1995). Library instruction: Principles, theories, connections, and challenges. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
32.
Platania, J. V. (1985). Adult learning and patterns of organizational development: As seen at the Institute of Clinical Social Work. Doctoral dissertation, The Wright Institute, 1984. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2698.
33.
Polinger, E. J. (1991). The effect of student-field instructor similarity on their respective perceptions of the field practicum in social work education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland-Baltimore, 1991. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 1897.
34.
Raschick, M., Maypole, D., & Day, P. (1998). Improving field instruction through Kolb learning theory. Journal of Social Work Education, 34, 31-42.
35.
Riechmann, S. W., & Grasha, A. F. (1974). A rational approach to developing and assessing the construct validity of a student learning style scales instrument. Journal of Psychology, 87, 213-223.
36.
Ruble, T. L., & Stout, D. E. (1994). A critical assessment of Kolb’s learning style inventory.Reproductions available through EDRS.
37.
Smith, D., & Kolb, D. (1996). User guide for the learning style inventory: A manual for teachers and trainers. Boston: McBer and Company.
38.
Spector, P. (1992). Summated rating scale construction: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
Van Soest, D., & Kruzich, J. (1994). The influence of learning styles on student and field instructor perceptions of field placement success. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 9, 49-69.
40.
Verheij, J., Stoutjesdijk, E., & Beishuizen, J. (1996). Search and study strategies in hypertext. Computers in Human Behavior, 12, 1-15.
41.
West, R. F. (1982). A construct validity study of Kolb’s learning style types in medical education. Journal of Medical Education, 57, 795-796.
42.
Willcoxson, L., & Prosser, M. (1996). Kolb’s learning style inventory (1985): Review and further study of validity and reliability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 247-257.
