The Empirical Validation of an Instrument to Predict Risk of Recidivism Among Juvenile Offenders

Abstract

An increase in the number of juveniles entering the juvenile justice system in the past 10 years has heightened the demand for rehabilitation services. Because the demand for rehabilitative services is greater than resources allow, efforts are underway to predict who is a high risk for recidivism so that services may be focused on these juveniles, while reducing efforts to those who are low-risk. In addition, statistical risk prediction is intended to infuse the decision-making process with greater equity and objectivity because the same factors are considered for every juvenile. This article describes the use of statistical risk prediction for first-time juvenile offenders. Suggestions for implementation are provided based on lessons learned from this research.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrews, D. , Kiessling, J. , Robinson, D. , & Mickus, S. (1986). The risk principle of case classification: An outcome evaluation with young adult probationers. Canadian Journal of Criminology, 28, 377-384.

Arizona Supreme Court . (1995). Arizona risk/needs manual. Phoenix, AZ: Author.

Bazemore, G. , & Dicker, T. J. (1996). Implementing the detention intake reform: The judicial response. The Prison Journal, 76, 5-21.

Camp, G. , & Camp, C. (1990). The corrections yearbook 1990: Juvenile corrections. New York: Criminal Justice Institute.

Dawes, R. M. , Faust, D. , & Meehl, P. (1989). Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science, 243, 1668-1674.

DeComo, R. E. , Wagner, D. , & Baird, S. C. (1994). Validation of the Oregon risk assessment tools used for classification of offenders on supervision. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.

Demaris, A. (1992). Logit modeling: Practical applications. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Jones, P. R. (1996). Risk prediction in criminal justice. In A. T. Harland (Ed.), Choosing correctional options that work: Defining the demand and evaluating the supply (pp. 33-68). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kurz, G. A. , & Moore, L. E. (1994). The 8% problem: Chronic juvenile offender recidivism. Orange County, CA: Orange County Probation Department.

10.

Monahan, J. (1981). Predicting violent behavior: An assessment of clinical techniques. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

12.

Schnieder, A. , Ervin, L. , & Snyder-Joy, Z. (1996). Further exploration of the flight from discretion: The role of risk/need instruments in probation supervision decisions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 24, 109-121.

13.

Wagner, D. , DeComo, R. E. , & Wiebush, R. (1994). Development of a risk needs instrument for first referrals to the Arizona juvenile courts: Structuring decisions about prevention services. San Francisco: National Council on Crime and Delinquency.