ArtilesA. J.RuedaR.SalazarJ. J.HigaredaI. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440 290507100305
2.
CubaM. J.TeferaA. A. (2024). Contextualizing multilingual learner disproportionality in special education: A mixed-methods approach. Teachers College Record, 126(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/01614681241233877
3.
DenmanD.CordierR.KimJ.-H.MunroN.SpeyeraR. (2021). What influences speech-language pathologists’ use of different types of language assessments for elementary school–age children?Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 52, 776–793. https://doi/10.1044/2021_LSHSS-20-00053
4.
FeuersteinR.FeuersteinR. S.FalikL. H.RandY. (2002). The dynamic assessment of cognitive modifiability: The Learning Propensity Assessment Device: Theory, instruments and techniques. ICELP Publications.
5.
HuertaL.CycykL.M.Sanford-KellerH.BuschA.DolataJ.MooreH.De AndaS.ZuckermanK. (2021). A retrospective review of communication evaluation practices of young Latinx children. Journal of Early Intervention, 43, 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211012703
6.
HuntE.NangC.MeldrumS.ArmstrongE. (2022). Can dynamic assessment identify language disorder in multilingual children? Clinical applications from a systematic review. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 53(2), 598–625. https://doi: 10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00094
7.
Hwa-FroelichD. A.MatsuoH. (2005). Vietnamese children and language-based processing tasks. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(3), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/023)
8.
LamJ. H. Y.ResendizM. D.BedoreL. M.GillamR. B. (2024). Validation of the mediated learning observation instrument among children with and without developmental language disorder in dynamic assessment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 67, 2159–2171. https://doi.org/ 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-23-00127
9.
LidzC. S. (1991). Practitioner’s guide to dynamic assessment. Guilford.
10.
OrellanaC.WadaR.GillamR. B. (2019). The use of dynamic assessment for the diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28, 1298–1317. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0202
11.
PeñaE. D.GillamR. B.BedoreL. M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of narrative ability in English accurately identifies language impairment in English language learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2208–2220. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0151
12.
PeñaE. D.IglesiasA.LidzC. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children’s word learning ability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10, 138–154. https://doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/014)
13.
PetersenD. B.ChanthongthipH.UkrainetzT. A.SpencerT. D.SteeveR. W. (2017). Dynamic assessment of narratives: Efficient, accurate identification of language disorder in bilingual students. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60, 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0426
14.
UkrainetzT. A.HarpellS.WalshC.CoyleC. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3102.142