HaywoodH. C.LidzC. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511607516
2.
Hwa-FroelichD. A.MatsuoH. (2005). Vietnamese children and language-based processing tasks. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 36(3), 230–43. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/023)
3.
OrellanaC.WadaR.GillamR. B. (2019). The use of dynamic assessment for the diagnosis of language disorders in bilingual children: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28, 1298–1317. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0202
4.
PeñaE. D.GillamR. B.BedoreL. M. (2014). Dynamic assessment of narrative ability in English accurately identifies language impairment in English language learners. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(6), 2208–2220. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2001/014)
5.
PeñaE. D.IglesiasA.LidzC. S. (2001). Reducing test bias through dynamic assessment of children’s word learning ability. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 10(2), 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2001/014)
6.
PeñaE. D.ReséndizM.GillamR. B. (2007). The role of clinical judgements of modifiability in the diagnosis of language impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 9(4), 332–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/14417040701413738
7.
PeñaE. D.VillarrealB. (2000). Modifiability observation form [Unpublished instrument].
8.
PetersenD. B.ChanthongthipH.UkrainetzT. A.SpencerT. D.SteeveR. W. (2017). Dynamic assessment of narratives: Efficient, accurate identification of language impairment in bilingual students. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(4), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0426
9.
UkrainetzT. A.HarpellS.WalshC.CoyleC. (2000). A preliminary investigation of dynamic assessment with Native American kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 31(2), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461.3102.142
