BermanR.Nir-SagivB. (2007). Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox. Discourse Processes, 43, 79–120. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp4302_1
2.
BrimoD.Hall-MillsS. (2019). Adolescents’ production of complex syntax in spoken and written expository and persuasive genres. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 33, 237–255. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2018.1504987
3.
CoelhoC. (2007). Management of discourse deficits following traumatic brain injury: Progress, caveats, and needs. Seminars in Speech and Language, 28, 122–135. http://doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-970570
4.
GlosserG.DeserT. (1991). Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain and Language, 40, 67–88. http://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90117-J
5.
HeilmannJ.MaloneT. O.WesterveldM. F. (2020). Properties of spoken persuasive language samples from typically developing adolescents. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51, 441–456. http://doi.org/10.1044/2019_LSHSS19-00078
6.
HillE.ClaessenM.WhitworthA.BoyesM. (2021). Profiling variability and development of spoken discourse in main-stream adolescents. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 32(2), 117–137. http://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2020.1731607
7.
LobanW. (1976). Language development: Kindergarten through Grade 12. National Council of Teachers of English.
8.
LundineJ. P.HarnishS. M.McCauleyR. J.ZezinkaA. B.BlackettD. S.FoxR. A. (2018). Exploring summarization differences for two types of expository discourse in adolescents with traumatic brain injury. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27, 247–257. http://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0131
9.
MakinenL.LoukusaS.NieminenL.LeinonenE.KunnariS. (2014). The development of narrative productivity, syntactic complexity, event content, and referential cohesion in four- to eight-year-old Finnish children. First Language, 34, 24–42. http://doi.org/10.1177/0142723713511000
10.
MillerJ.IglesiasA. (2019). Systematic analysis of language transcripts [SALT], Research version 2019. SALT Software, LLC.
11.
NicholasL.BrookshireR. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. http://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3602.338
12.
NippoldM. (2007). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults (3rd ed.). Pro-Ed.
13.
SpencerE.BryantL.ColyvasK. (2020). Minimizing variability in language sampling analysis: A practical way to calculate text length and time variability and measure reliable change when assessing clients. Topics in Language Disorders, 40, 166–181. http://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0000000000000212
14.
TurkstraL. (2000). Should my shirt be tucked in or left out? The communication context of adolescence. Aphasiology, 14, 349–364. http://doi.org/10.1080/026870300401405
15.
Ward-LonerganJ. M.DuthieJ. K. (2013). Expository discourse intervention for adolescents with language disorders. Perspectives on Language Learning and Education, 20, 44–56. http://doi.org/10.1044/lle20.2.44
16.
WesterveldM.VidlerK. (2016). Spoken language samples of Australian children in conversation, narration and exposition. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 18, 288–298. http://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2016.1159332
