BarzilaiS.StrømsøH. I. (2018). Individual differences in multiple document comprehension. In BraaschJ. L. G.BråtenI.McCruddenM. T. (Eds.), Handbook of multiple source use (pp. 99–116). Routledge.
2.
BarzilaiS.ZoharA. R.Mor-HaganiS. (2018). Promoting integration of multiple texts: A review of instructional approaches and practices. Educational Psychological Review, 30, 973–999. doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9436-8
3.
FergusonL. E.BråtenI.StrømsøH. I.AnamarkrudØ. (2013). Epistemic beliefs and comprehension in the context of reading multiple documents: Examining the role of conflict. International Journal of Education Research, 62, 100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2013.07.001
4.
LecceS.CaputiM.PagninA. (2014). Long-term effect of theory of mind on school achievement: The role of sensitivity to criticism. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 11(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.821944
5.
LecceS.ZocchiS.PagninA.PalladinoP.TaumoepeauM. (2010). Reading minds: The relation between children’s mental state knowledge and their metaknowledge about reading. Child Development, 81(6), 1876–1893. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01516.x
6.
OsterhauseC.KoerberS.SodianS. (2017). Scientific thinking in elementary school: Children’ social cognition and their epistemological understanding promote experimentation skills. Developmental Psychology, 53, 450–462. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000260
7.
RouetJ.-F.BrittM. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In McDruddenM.T.MaglianoJ.P.SchrawG. (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 19–52). Information Age.
8.
WhiteS.HappeF.HillE.FirthU. (2009). Revisiting the strange stories: Revealing mentalizing impairments in autism. Child Development, 80(4), 1097–1117.
