OwensR. E.PavelkoS. L. (2020). Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR): Quantitative values for language sample analysis measures in 7- to 11-yearold children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 734–744.
2.
OwensR. E.PavelkoS. L.BambinelliD. (2018). Moving beyond mean length of utterance: Analyzing language samples to identify intervention targets. Perspectives ASHA SIGs, 3(SIG 1), 5-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/persp3.SIG1.5
3.
PavelkoS. L.OwensR. E. (2017). Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR): New normative values for language sample analysis measures. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48(3), 197-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0022.
4.
PavelkoS. L.OwensR. E. (2019a). Diagnostic accuracy of the SUGAR measures for identifying children with language impairment. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50, 211-223.
5.
PavelkoS. L.OwensR. E. (2019b). SUGAR (Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised): Breaking tradition. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 50, 452-456.
6.
PavelkoS. L.OwensR. E.IrelandM.Hahs-VaughnD. L. (2016). Use of language sample analysis by school-based SLPs: Results of a nationwide survey. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 47, 246-258.
7.
PavelkoS. L.PriceL. R.OwensR. E. (2020). Revisiting reliability: Using Sampling Utterances and Grammatical Analysis Revised (SUGAR) to compare 25- and 50-utterance language samples. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 778-794.
