AdamsC.ClarkeE.HaynesR. (2009). Inference and sentence comprehension in children with specific or pragmatic language impairments. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 44, 301–318.
2.
BottingN.AdamsC. (2005). Semantic and inferencing abilities in children with communication disorders. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 40, 49–66.
3.
CainK.OakhillJ. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequence. In CainK.OakhillJ. (Eds.), Children’s comprehension problems in oral and written text: A cognitive perspective (pp. 41–75). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
4.
FordJ. A.MiloskyL. M. (2003). Inferring emotional reactions in social situations: Differences in children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 21–30.
5.
HulmeC.SnowlingM. J. (2014). The interface between spoken and written language: Developmental disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369, Article 20120395.
6.
KarasinskiC.WeismerS. E. (2010). Comprehension of inferences in discourse processing by adolescents with and without language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 1268–1279.
7.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95(2), 163–182.
8.
KispelA. (2008). Effective teaching of inference skills for reading: Literature review. UK: National Foundation for Educational Research.
9.
LaingS. P.KamhiA. G. (2002). The use of think-aloud protocols to compare inferencing abilities in average and below-average readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 436–447.
10.
MayerM. (1994). Baba Yaga and Vasilisa the brave. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
11.
McGeeA.JohnsonH. (2003). The effect of inference training on skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Educational Psychology, 23, 49–59.
12.
NaiglesL. R.KelleyE.TroyE.FeinF. (2013). Residual difficulties with categorical induction in children with a history of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 2048–2061.
13.
NorburyC.BishopD. V. M. (2002). Inferential processing and story recall in children with communication problems: A comparison of specific language impairment, pragmatic language impairment and high-functioning autism. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 11, 121–251.
14.
NorburyC.NationK. (2011). Understanding variability in reading comprehension in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Interactions with language status and decoding skill. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15, 191210.
15.
NuskeH. J.BavinE. L. (2011). Narrative comprehension in 4-7-year old children with autism: Testing the weak central coherence account. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorder, 46, 108–119.
16.
OakhillJ.CainK.McCarthyD. (2015). Inference processing in children: The contributions of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. In O’BrienE.CookA.LorchR. (Eds.), Inferences during reading (pp. 140-159). New York: Cambridge.
17.
OakhillJ.YuillN. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In CornoldiC.OakhillJ. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 69–92). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
SnowC. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R & D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
19.
SpencerM.QuinnJ. M.WagnerR. K. (2014). Specific reading comprehension disability: Major problem, myth, or misnomer?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 3–9.
20.
TapieroI. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence: Toward a definition of comprehension. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
TolstoyA. (2005). The gigantic turnip. Cambridge, MA: Barefoot Books.
22.
VendevilleN.BlancN.BrechetC. (2015). A drawing task to assess emotion inference in language-impaired children. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 58, 1563–1569.
23.
WinneP. H.GrahamL.ProckL. (1993). A model of poor readers’ text-based inferencing: Effects of explanatory feedback. Reading Research Quarterly, 28, 52–66.