AshabrannerB.AshabrannerJ. (1992). Always remember: The story of the Viet Nam Memorial. New York, NY: Scholastic.
2.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G. (2006). Improving comprehension with questioning the author. New York, NY: Scholastic.
3.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.KucanL. (2013). Bringing words to life. New York, NY: Guilford.
4.
CattsH. W.KamhiA. G. (2017). Prologue: Reading comprehension is not a single ability. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 48, 73–76.
5.
BosC. S.AndersP. L. (1990). Effects of interactive vocabulary instruction on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of junior-high learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 31–42.
6.
ColeR. (1995). The story of Ruby Bridges. New York, NY: Scholastic.
7.
CuttingL. E.ScarboroughH. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299.
8.
Dr. Seuss. (1984). The butter battle book. New York, NY: Random House.
9.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.WilliamsJ. P.BakerS. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71, 279–320.
10.
GoughP.TunmerW. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
11.
HirschE. D. (1988). Cultural literacy: What every American needs to know. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
12.
HirschE. D. (2016). Why knowledge matters: Rescuing our children from failed educational theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
13.
HoffmanM. (1991). Amazing Grace. New York, NY: Dial Books.
14.
KendeouP.van den BroekP. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1567–1577.
15.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.BlakeR. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 218–253.
16.
OakhillJ. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, Section A, 35, 441–450.
17.
SchneiderW.KörkelJ.WeinertF. E. (1989). Domain specific knowledge and memory performance: A comparison of high- and low-aptitude children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 306–312.
18.
SwansonE.WanzekJ.McCulleyL.Stillman-SpisakS.VaughnS.SimmonsD.HairrellA. (2016). Literacy and text reading in middle and high school social studies and English language arts classrooms. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32, 199–222.
19.
WillinghamD. T. (2017). The reading mind: A cognitive approach to understanding how the mind reads. Sand Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.