While the field of music education is rife with participation in methodological debates around “best systems” for learning about pitch, the authors in this article explore the possibilities of learner-centered approaches to teaching pitch among students with diverse music backgrounds. Specifically, the article highlights several challenges faced by the students with fixed pitch backgrounds in U.S. music classrooms: confusion around solfège syllables used to represent both movable and fixed pitch systems, and difficulty in transitioning between fixed and movable systems regardless of the symbolic language used. The authors offer a variety of research-based recommendations for deepening students' understandings of pitch in light of these challenges and emphasize the necessity for a learner-centered approach to pitch pedagogy in U.S. music classrooms. The purpose of this article is to (1) help practicing teachers understand more deeply and empathize with the nature of confusion students with fixed pitch backgrounds might experience in American music classrooms, and (2) develop pedagogical strategies that are sensitive to the experiences of these students while working to deepen understanding of pitch.
AndersonW. T. (2012). The Dalcroze approach to music education: Theory and applications. General Music Today, 26(1), 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371311428979
2.
AntinoneP. M. (2000). The effect of Movable-Do versus Fixed-Do sight reading systems on beginning choral students’ melodic sight-reading accuracy. https://twu-ir.tdl.org/handle/11274/782
3.
BoucherH. (2019). For a cultural adaptation of the Kodály approach for French Québécois including the use of the fixed do system. The Canadian Music Educator, 60(3), 14–22.
4.
BowyerJ. (2015). More than Solfège and hand signs: Philosophy, tools, and lesson planning in the authentic Kodály classroom. Music Educators Journal, 102(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432115611232
5.
BridgesD. (1992). Fixed and Moveable Doh in historical perspective. Australian Journal for Music Education, 30, 11–15.
6.
BrownK. D. (2003). An alternative approach to developing music literacy skills in a transient society. Music Educators Journal, 90(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.2307/3399934
BrunerJ. S. (1977). The process of education. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1960)
9.
BurnsC. (2020). Another view of the elementary music classroom. In WilliamsD.KladderJ. (Eds.), The learner-centered music classroom: Models and possibilities (pp. 39–50). Routledge.
10.
CampbellP. S. (2010). Songs in their heads: Music and its meaning in children’s lives. Oxford University Press.
11.
CassidyJ. W. (1993). Effects of various sight singing strategies on nonmusic majors’ pitch accuracy. Journal of Research in Music Education, 41(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345505
12.
CoppenbargerB. (2014). Music theory secrets: 94 Strategies for the starting musician. Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
CustoderoL. A. (2006). Singing practices in 10 families with young children. Journal of Research in Music Education, 54(1), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940605400104
14.
CustoderoL. A.Johnson-GreenE. A. (2003). Passing the cultural torch: Musical experience and musical parenting of infants. Journal of Research in Music Education, 51(2), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345844
15.
DemorestS. M. (2001). Building choral excellence: Teaching sight-singing in the choral rehearsal. Oxford University Press.
16.
DemorestS. M. (2004). Choral sight-singing practices: Revisiting a web-based survey. International Journal of Research in Choral Singing, 2(1), 3–10.
17.
DemorestS. M.MayW. V. (1995). Sight-singing instruction in the choral ensemble: Factors related to individual performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(2), 156–167. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345676
18.
FloydE.BradleyK. D. (2006). Teaching strategies related to successful sight-singing in Kentucky choral ensembles. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 25(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233060250010108
Frey-ClarkM. (2017). Pitch systems and Curwen hand signs: A review of literature. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 36(1), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316689812
GordonE. E. (2012). Learning sequences in music: A contemporary music learning theory. GIA Publications.
23.
GuzzettaC. A. (2020). Learning method preferences in a steel drum classroom: Exploring a learner-centered pedagogy through composition, peer teaching, and student-led Modern Band projects in a middle school setting. International Journal of Music Education, 38(2), 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761419877575
HenryM. (2001). The development of a Vocal Sight-Reading Inventory. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 150, 21–35.
26.
HenryM.DemorestS. (1994). Individual sight-singing achievement in successful choral ensembles. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 13(1), 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/875512339401300102
27.
HolmesA. V. (2009). Effect of fixed-do and movable-do solfege instruction on the development of sight-singing skills in 7- and 8-year-old children. University of Florida.
28.
HoulahanM.TackaP. (2015). Kodály today: A cognitive approach to elementary music education. Oxford University Press.
29.
Huhtinen-HildénL.PittJ. (2018). Taking a learner-centred approach to music education. Routledge.
30.
HungJ.-L. (2012). An investigation of the influence of fixed-do and movable-do solfège systems on sight-singing pitch accuracy for various levels of diatonic and chromatic complexity [Doctor of Education, University of San Francisco]. http://repository.usfca.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1037&context=diss
31.
JacobiB. S. (2012). Kodály, literacy, and the brain: Preparing young music students to read pitch on the staff. General Music Today, 25(2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1048371311414182
32.
KillianJ. N.HenryM. L. (2005). A comparison of successful and unsuccessful strategies in individual sight-singing preparation and performance. Journal of Research in Music Education, 53(1), 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940505300105
33.
KladderJ. (2020a). Learner-centered teaching: Alternatives to the established norm. In WilliamsD.KladderJ. (Eds.), The learner-centered music classroom: Models and possibilities (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
34.
KladderJ. (2020b). The non-traditional secondary music performance class. In WilliamsD.KladderJ. (Eds.), The learner-centered music classroom: Models and possibilities (pp. 141–160). Routledge.
35.
KogaM. (2016). Ti a drink with jam and bread: Developing musical understanding through Solfège. American Music Teacher, 65(5), 8–12.
KruseA. J. (2016). “They wasn’t makin’ my kinda music”: A hip-hop musician's perspective on school, schooling, and school music. Music Education Research, 18(3), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2015.1060954
38.
KuehneJ. M. (2007). A survey of sight-singing instructional practices in Florida middle-school choral programs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 55(2), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1177/002242940705500203
39.
LorekM. J.PembrookR. G. (2000). To doh or not to doh: The comparative effectiveness of sightsinging syllable systems. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 14(1), 1–14.
MillerB. A. (2007). Of hot cross buns and hot dog buns: Bridging the gap between iconic and symbolic modes of understanding. General Music Today, 20(3), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/10483713070200030104
47.
MuscoA. M. (2012). Solfege for instrumentalists. Teaching Music, 19(5), 26–28.
48.
NicholsB. (2012). The way we do the things we do: A survey of middle-school choral educators’ sight-singing attitudes and influences. Contributions to Music Education, 39, 87–100.
49.
PalfyC. S.GilsonE. (2018). The hidden curriculum in the music theory classroom. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 32, 79–110.
50.
RegelskiT. (2002). On “methodolatry” and music teaching as critical and reflective praxis. Philosophy of Music Education Review, 10(2), 102–123. https://doi.org/10.2979/PME.2002.10.2.102
51.
ReifingerJ. L. (2012). The acquisition of sight-singing skills in second-grade general music: effects of using Solfège and of relating tonal patterns to songs. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411435683
52.
SauerlandW. (2018). Voice class: A learner-centered approach. Journal of Singing, 74(5), 527–532.
53.
SmithT. A. (1991). A comparison of pedagogical resources in solmization systems. Journal of Music Theory Pedagogy, 5(1), 1–23.
54.
SouthcottJ. (1995). Daniel Batchellor and the American Tonic Sol-fa Movement. Journal of Research in Music Education, 43(1), 60–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3345792
55.
SvecC. L. (2017). Describing elementary certification methods across the elementary music career cycle. Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(3), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755123316649014
56.
TanS.-L.WakefieldE. M.JeffriesP. W. (2009). Musically untrained college students’ interpretations of musical notation: sound, silence, loudness, duration, and temporal order. Psychology of Music, 37(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608090845
57.
ThomsenK. M. (2011). Hearing is believing: Dalcroze Solfège and Musical Understanding. Music Educators Journal, 98(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432111425614
58.
TobiasE. S. (2015). Crossfading music education: Connections between secondary students’ in- and out-of-school music experience. International Journal of Music Education, 33(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761413515809
59.
TownerD. (2012). String methods that use Solfege. Kodaly Envoy, Fall, 15.
60.
Van ManenM. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. SUNY Press.
61.
WilliamsD. (2020). The traditional secondary concert band. In WilliamsD.KladderJ. (Eds.), The learner-centered music classroom: Models and possibilities (pp. 69–84). Routledge.
