This study examined occupational exposures and their associations with health outcomes among informal wood furniture workers in Thailand. A cross-sectional survey of 167 workers was conducted using the Healthy i-Work web application. The most common exposures were wood dust (69.46 percent), awkward postures and heavy lifting (64.07 percent), and noise (48.50 percent). Musculoskeletal disorders were the most prevalent health issue (58.68 percent), followed by fatigue, numbness, and hearing and visual problems. Logistic regression analyses revealed that twisting, bending, and/or heavy lifting were strongly associated with musculoskeletal pain (AOR = 9.607, p < .001), exposures to energy and motion with injuries (AOR = 6.967, p = .044), chemical exposures with eye or skin irritation (AOR = 8.484, p = .003), and heat exposure with fatigue (AOR = 3.394, p = .008). Noise and psychosocial exposures were also significant predictors of hearing and stress-related symptoms. These findings highlight the urgent need for occupational safety interventions, ergonomic improvements, and expanded healthcare access for informal workers in Thailand.
SørensenOHHaslePBachE. Working in small enterprises–is there a special risk?Saf Sci2007; 45(10): 1044–1059.
3.
ChenMA. Rethinking the informal economy: Linkages with the formal economy and the formal regulatory environment (DESA Working Paper No. 46). Department of Economic and Social Affairs, United Nations, 2007.
AihongWPengboLXiaohaiL, et al.Application of a comprehensive risk assessment method for occupational disease hazards of employers in occupational health classification management of wooden furniture manufacturing factories. J Occup Environ Med2023; 40(6): 634–640.
7.
GauthierFGélinasDMarcotteP. Vibration of portable orbital sanders and its impact on the development of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in the furniture industry. Comput Ind Eng2012; 62(3): 762–769.
8.
RatnasingamJIorasFSwanT, et al.Determinants of occupational accidents in the woodworking sector: The case of the Malaysian wooden furniture industry. J Appl Sci2011; 11(3): 561–566.
9.
JerieS. Occupational health and safety problems among workers in the wood processing industries in Mutare, Zimbabwe. J Emerg Trends Econ2012; 3(3): 278–285.
KrejcieRVMorganDW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas1970; 30(3): 607–610.
13.
CohenJ. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge, 1988.
14.
CohenJ. Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychol Bull1992; 112(1): 155–159.
15.
NoorSTajikOGolzarJ. Simple random sampling. Int J Environ Stud2022; 1(2): 78–82.
16.
TantranontKSuthakornWWisutthananonA, et al.The self-care web application for informal workers in preventing occupational diseases and injuries: Developmental research. Thai J Safety Health2024; 17(2): 94–108.
17.
RiosMANeryAA. Working and health conditions reported by informal commerce workers. Texto Contexto - Enfermagem2015; 24(2): 390–398.
18.
ThanapopCThanapopSKeam-KanSJ, et al.Health status and occupational health and safety access among informal workers in the rural community, Southern Thailand. J Prim Care Community Health2021; 12: 21501327211015884.
19.
AdeiDKunfaaEJ. Occupational health and safety policy in the operations of the wood processing industry in Kumasi, Ghana. J Sci Technol2007; 27(2): 161–173.
20.
BlackNDilworthMSummersN. Occupational exposure to wood dust in the British woodworking industry in 1999/2000. Ann Occup Hyg2007; 51(3): 249–260.
EgliteMResteJCiruleJ, et al.Investigation of occupational morbidity in wood processing industry in comparison with other manufacturing industries and with occupational morbidity in Latvia at large. Proc Latv Acad Sci2010; 64(1/2): 46–52.
23.
EgliteMResteJCiruleJ, et al.Investigation of health condition of the employed in the wood processing industry. Proc Latv Acad Sci2010; 64(1/2): 39–45.
24.
SuchomelJBelanováKŠtollmannV. Analysis of occupational diseases occurring in forestry and wood processing industry in Slovakia. Drvna Industrija2011; 62(3): 219–228.
25.
PunnettLWegmanDH. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: The epidemiologic evidence and the debate. J Electromyogr Kinesiol2004; 14(1): 13–23.
26.
BarbeyCBonvallotNClercF. Health outcomes related to multiple exposures in occupational settings: A review. Saf Health Work2024; 15(4): 382–395.
27.
TobinEEdiagbonyaTOkojieO, et al.Occupational exposure to wood dust and respiratory health status of sawmill workers in south-south Nigeria. J Pollut Eff Cont2016; 4(1): 1–154.
28.
MorataTCThemannCLRandolphRF, et al.Working in noise with a hearing loss: Perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers. Ear Hear2005; 26(6): 529–545.
29.
PearceNCheckowayHKriebelD. Bias in occupational epidemiology studies. Occup Environ Med2007; 64(8): 562–568. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem2006.026690
30.
KopecJAEsdaileJM. Bias in case-control studies. A review. J Epidemiol Community Health1990; 44(3): 179–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech44.3.179
31.
KawakamiT. Participatory approaches to improving safety, health and working conditions in informal economy workplaces: Experiences of Cambodia, Thailand and Viet Nam. Geneva: International Labour Organization, 2007.
32.
Women in Informal Employment: Globalizing and Organizing (WIEGO). Informal workers and legal protection in Thailand. Cambridge, MA: WIEGO, 2011.
