This paper is intended to complement our extended documentation and analysis of the activities of the Gulf Coast Health Alliance: Health Risks related to the Macondo Spill project Community Outreach and Dissemination Core entitled, “Building and maintaining a citizen science network with fishermen and fishing communities after the Deepwater Horizon oil disaster using a Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) approach.” We discuss nuances of CBPR practice, including trust-building, clarification of stakeholder expectations, balancing timelines and agendas, cultural fluency, and the importance of regional history—political-economic context, regulatory practices, and cultural life-ways—in creating social dynamics that overarch and underpin the entire process. We examine the unique role of knowledge-making hybrid structures like the project’s Fishermen’s citizen science network and compare/contrast this structure with other models of participatory science or deliberation. Finally, we reiterate the importance of environmental health literacy efforts, summarize project outcomes, and offer thoughts on the future roles of collaborative efforts among communities and institutional science in environmental public health.
SullivanJCroisantSHowarthMet al.
Building and maintaining a citizen science network with fishermen and fishing communities post deepwater horizon oil disaster using a CBPR approach. New Solut2018;
28: 416–447.
2.
ChenPDiazNRosenthalM.Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. Am J Prev Med2010; 372–378.
3.
WilkinsC.Communicating results of community-based participatory research. Virtual Mentor2011;
13: 81–85.
4.
SequeiraESullivanJ.Popular arts and education in community-based participatory research (CBPR): on the subtle craft of developing and enhancing channels for clear conversations among CBPR partners. New Solut2010;
19: 399–406.
5.
IsraelBSchultzAParkerEet al.Critical issues in developing & following community-based participatory research principles. In: MinklerMWallersteinN (eds) Community-based participatory research for health.
San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 53–76.
SullivanJCroisantSDiamondPet al.
Public talks and science listens: a community-based participatory approach to characterizing environmental health risk perceptions and assessing recovery needs in the wake of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Environ Health Insights2009;
3: 37–51.
8.
TibbettsJ.Louisiana’s wetlands: a lesson in nature appreciation. Environ Health Perspect2006;
114: A40–A43.
CroisantSAnsariSElferinkC. Orientation to goals/objectives of GC-HARMS & the values/practice principles of a CBPR approach to research. Presentation: GC-HARMS Integration Meeting; Galveston, TX, July 2012.
(DR2) RAPIDD Study: Disaster Response Research. U.S. National Library of Medicine; NIEHS; National Institutes of Health; U.S. Health & Human Services, http://dr2.nlm.nih.gov/protocols (2015, accessed 23 October 2018).
AdgateJGoldsteinBMcKenzieL.Potential public health hazards, exposures and health effects from unconventional natural gas development. Environ Sci Technol2014;
48: 8307–8320.
WhitworthKSymanskiECokerA.Childhood lymphohematopoietic cancer incidence and hazardous air pollutants in Southeast Texas, 1995–2004. Environ Health Perspect2008;
116: 1576–1580.
PieterseBFelzelEWinterRet al.
PAH-CALUX, an optimized bioassay for AhR-mediated hazard identification of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as individual compounds and in complex mixtures. Environ Sci Technol2013;
47: 11651–11659.
34.
MumtazMMGeorgeJDGoldKWet al.
ATSDR evaluation of health effects of chemicals. IV. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): understanding a complex problem. Toxicol Ind Health1996;
12: 742–971.
35.
HuangMZhangLMesarosCet al.
Metabolism of a representative oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) phenanthrene-9,10-quinone in human hepatoma (HepG2) cells. Chem Res Toxicol2014;
27: 852–863.
36.
SullivanJCroisantSSubraW. Gulf coast health alliance: health risks related to the macondo spill – using a CBPR approach to developing tools & techniques that communicate risk and increase environmental health literacy in gulf coast communities affected by the DWH oil disaster. Presentation Abstract: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; Chicago, IL; 31 October–3 November, 2015, (#334472) https://apha.confex.com/apha/143am/webprogram/Paper334472.html (accessed 23 October 2018).
37.
EmmettEZhangHHuffordM.Development and successful application of a community-first communication model for community-based environmental health research. J Occup Environ Med2009;
51: 146–156.
38.
DurrenbergerEP.Shrimpers & turtles on the Gulf Coast: the formation of fisheries policy in the United States; marine anthropological studies (MAST).
The Netherlands:
MARE Centre, www.marecentre.nl/mast/documents/ShrimpersandTurtlesontheGulfCoast.pdf (1988, access article from Old Mast archives, Vol. 1 1988; accessed 23 October 2018).
39.
DyerCMobergM.The ‘Moral economy’ of resistance: turtle excluder devices and Gulf of Mexico shrimp fishermen; marine anthropological studies (MAST).
The Netherlands:
Mare Centre, www.marecentre.nl/mast/documents/TheMoraleconomyofresistance.pdf. Access article from Old Mast archives, Vol. 2 (1992, accessed 23 October 2018).
40.
MargavioAForsythC.Caught in the net: conflict between shrimpers & conservationists.
College Station:
Texas A&M University Press, 1996, pp. 143–146.
41.
WrightB.Race, politics and pollution: environmental justice in the Mississippi River chemical corridor. In: AgyemanJBullardBEvansB (eds) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world.
Cambridge:
The MIT Press, 2003, pp. 125–145.
42.
ClaudioL.Standing on principle: the global push for environmental justice. Environ Health Perspect2007;
115: A500–A503.
43.
RobertsJTToffolon-WeissM.(1) EPA’s environmental justice test case: the Shintech PVC plant, pp. 101–136. (2) Media savvy Cajuns and Houma Indians: fighting an oil field waste dump in grand bois, pp. 137–164. Chronicles from the environmental justice frontline.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, 2001.
44.
VandermeerD.Diamond: a struggle for environmental justice in Louisiana’s chemical corridor. Environ Health Perspect2004;
113: A68.
SullivanJSubraWHowarthMet al. (# 313640) Building and Nurturing a Citizen Science Network with fishermen and fishing communities post DWH oil disaster. Presentation Abstract: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; New Orleans, LA; 15–18 November 2014, https://apha.confex.com/apha/142am/webprogram/Paper313640.html (accessed 23 October 2018).
47.
CallonMLascoumesPBartheY.Acting in an uncertain world: an essay on technical democracy, pp. 118–124, 225–242.
Cambridge:
MIT Press, 2011.
48.
ProchaskaJKelleyHLinderS.Health inequities in environmental justice environmental justice communities: relevant indicators to reflect a variety of health threats. Int J Equity Health2012;
11: A7.
49.
BhatiaRCorburnJ.Lessons from San Francisco: health impact assessments have advanced political conditions for improving population health. Health Aff (Millwood)2011;
30: 2410–2418.
50.
CorburnJ.Health impact assessment. Toward a healthy city.
Cambridge:
MIT Press, 2009, pp. 163–196.
51.
FischerF.Citizens, experts and the environment: the politics of local knowledge.
London:
Duke University Press, 2000, pp. 29–47, 143–170.
52.
FischerF.Democracy & expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 2009, pp. 107–116.
OttingerG.Buckets of resistance: standards and the effectiveness of citizen science. Sci Technol Hum Values2010;
35: 244–270.
58.
NIEHS: Advancing Environmental Justice: Contributions of the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences Division of Extramural Research and Training to Environmental Justice: 1998–2012. July 2015. See: Project COAL (Communities Organized Against Asthma & Lead); p. 18, pp. 39–40, www.niehs.nih.gov/research/supported/assets/docs//a_c/advancing_environmental_justice_508.pdf (accessed 23 October 2018).
McCormickS.After the cap: risk assessment, citizen science, and disaster recovery. Ecol Soc2012;
17: 31.
61.
KitcherP.Science in a democratic society.
Amherst:
Prometheus Books, 2011, pp. 20–40.
62.
CorburnJ.Street science: community knowledge and environmental health justice.
Cambridge:
The MIT Press, 2005, pp. 35–79.
63.
WallersteinNDuranB.The conceptual, historical and practice roots of community-based participatory research and related participatory traditions. In: MinklerMWallersteinN. Community based participatory research for health.
San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 27–52.
64.
SullivanJSubraWCroisantSet al. (#294032) Communicating risk to environmental justice communities: promoting a culturally-fluent, bi-directional conversation enhancing expertise with local knowledge. Presentation Abstract: American Public Health Association Annual Meeting; Boston, MA; 2–6 November 2013, https://apha.confex.com/apha/141am/webprogram/Paper294032.html (accessed 23 October 2018).
65.
CashmanSBCorburnJ.The power and the promise: working with communities to analyze data, interpret findings, and get to outcomes. Am J Public Health2008;
98: 1407–1417.
66.
FinnSO’FallonL.The emergence of environmental health literacy – from its roots to its future potential. Environ Health Perspect2017;
125: 495–501.
67.
IsraelBCoombeCCheezumRRet al.
Community-based participatory research: a capacity-building approach for policy advocacy aimed at eliminating health disparities. Am J Public Health2011;
100: 2094–2102.
68.
Leung-RubinCSprague-MartinezLChuJet al.
Community-engaged pedagogy: a strengths-based approach to involving diverse stakeholders in research partnerships. Prog Community Health Partnersh2012;
6: 481–490.
69.
FruedenbergNPastorMIsraelB.Strengthening community capacity in making decisions to reduce disproportionate environmental exposures. Am J Public Health2011;
101: S123–S130.
70.
AkabaA.Science as a double-edged sword. Race, poverty & the environment2005;
XI: 9–11.
71.
LegatorM.You can do it too: identification of health hazards by non-professionals. In: LegatiorMStrawnS (eds) Chemical alert: a community action handbook.
Austin:
University of Texas Press, 1993, pp. 1–6.
72.
BullardR.The quest for environmental justice: human rights and the politics of pollution.
San Francisco:
Sierra Club Books, 2005, pp. 25–32.
73.
KreibelDTicknerJEpsteinPet al.
The precautionary principle in environmental science. Environ Health Perspect2001;
109: 871–876.
74.
SandweissS.The social construction of environmental justice. In: CamachoD (ed) Environmental injustices, political struggles: race, class and the environment.
Durham:
Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 31–57.
75.
RahmanKS. Is participatory rule-making possible: by giving people a direct voice in shaping regulations, we can make agencies more responsive and accountable and give citizens a direct stake in policy-making. The Nation, 9 April 2012, www.thenation.com/article/participatory-rule-making-possible/ (accessed 23 October 2018).
76.
Payne-SturgesDSchwabMBuckleyTJ.Closing the research loop: a risk-based approach for communicating results of air pollution exposure studies. Environ Health Perspect2004;
112: 28–34.
77.
CamachoD.The environmental justice movement: a political framework. In: CamachoD (ed) Environmental injustices, political struggles: race, class and the environment.
Durham:
Duke University Press, 1998, pp. 11–30.
78.
LarsonS.Science: more harmful than helpful?Race Poverty Environ2005;
XI: 12.
79.
RuckelshausW.Risk, science and democracy. In: GlickmanTGoughM (eds) Readings in risk.
Washington:
Resources for the Future, 2004 (revised, 5th printing), pp. 105–118.
80.
Jemez Principles for Democratic Organizing; SNEEJ, Jemez New Mexico, www.ejnet.org/ej/jemez.pdf (1996, accessed 23 October 2018).
81.
GillsD.Unequal and uneven: Critical aspects of community – university partnership.
Washington:
American Public Health Association Press, 2000.
82.
MinklerMWallersteinN.Introduction to community based participatory research. In: MinklerMWallersteinN (eds) Community based participatory research for health.
San Francisco:
Jossey-Bass, 2003, pp. 3–26.
83.
ChaseS.Changing the nature of environmental studies: teaching environmental justice to mainstream students. In: AdamsonJEvansMMSteinR (eds) The environmental justice reader: politics, poetics & pedagogy.
Tucson:
University of Arizona Press, 2002, pp. 350–367.
84.
McCloskeyDJAguilar-GaxiolaSMichenerJL. Principles of community engagement, pp. 43–55, pp. 107–149. Developed by: US Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, Center for Disease control, Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry, Clinical & Translational Science Awards. NIH Publication: #11-7782. 2nd ed. Washington: U. S. Government Printing Office, 2011.
85.
Public Lab is a collaborative community that teaches citizens how to investigate environmental health concerns using inexpensive DIY techniques, https://publiclab.org/ (accessed 23 October 2018).
