Variance in State Protection from Exposure to NORM and TENORM Wastes Generated During Unconventional Oil and Gas Operations: Where We Are and Where We Need to Go

Abstract

Radioactive materials for the medical, technological, and industrial sectors have been effectively regulated in the United States since as early as 1962. The steady increase in the exploration and production of shale gas in recent years has led to concerns about exposures to Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (NORM) and Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM) in oil and gas waste streams. This study applied policy surveillance methods to conduct a cross-sectional fifty-state survey of law and regulations of NORM and TENORM waste from oil and gas operations. Results indicated that seventeen states drafted express regulations to reduce exposure to oil and gas NORM and TENORM waste. States with active oil and gas drilling that lack regulations controlling exposure to NORM and TENORM may leave the public and workers susceptible to adverse health effects from radiation. The study concludes with recommendations in regard to regulating oil and gas NORM and TENORM waste.

Keywords

NORM TENORM fracking unconventional oil and gas worker exposure oil and gas regulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Kentucky: Cabinet for Health and Family Services. Nuclear, http://chfs.ky.gov/news/Nuclear.htm (accessed 2 April 2017).

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation. TENORM: oil and gas production wastes, https://www.epa.gov/radiation/tenorm-oil-and-gas-production-wastes (accessed 27 March 2017).

U.S. Energy Information Administration. Where our natural gas comes from—energy explained, your guide to understanding energy, https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/index.cfm?page=natural_gas_where (accessed 21 March 2017).

U.S. Energy Information Administration. Number of producing gas wells, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_wells_s1_a.htm (accessed March 27, 2017)

Rich

Crosby

EC.

Analysis of reserve pit sludge from unconventional natural gas hydraulic fracturing and drilling operations for the presence of technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive material (TENORM). New Solut 2013; 23: 117–135.

Radiation Focus Group, Federal Facilities Research Center. State regulations and policies for control of naturally-occurring and accelerator produced radioactive materials (NARM) and Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials (TENORM), http://www.astswmo.org/Files/Policies_and_Publications/Materials_Management/State%20Statutes%20and%20Regulations%20on%20TENORM%20Final%20Dec2014.pdf (2014, accessed 20 March 2017).

Chen

Moeller

Dornsife

et al . Toward the framework and implementation for clearance of materials from regulated facilities. Health Phys 2005; 89: 115–126.

Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors. Suggested state regulations for control of radiation, http://www.crcpd.org/page/SSRCRs (accessed 27 February 2017).

Marcinowski

Guidance—potential for radiation contamination associated with mineral and resource extraction industries, https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/mineguide.pdf (2003, accessed 20 March 2017).

10.

U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 29, Part 1910.1096.

11.

Vearrier

Curtis

Greenberg

MI.

Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials. Clin Toxicol 2009; 47: 393–406.

12.

Nelson

Eitrheim

Knight

et al . Understanding the radioactive ingrowth and decay of naturally occurring radioactive materials in the environment: an analysis of produced fluids from the Marcellus Shale. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123: 689–696.

13.

National Research Council, Committee on Evaluation of EPA Guidelines for Exposure to Naturally Occurring Radioactive. Major sources of technologically enhanced naturally-occurring radioactive materials. In: Grossblatt N (Ed.) Evaluation of guidelines for exposures to technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1999, pp. 61–74.

14.

Schmidt

AP.

Naturally occurring radioactive materials in the gas and oil industry: origin, transport and deposition of stable lead and 210Pb from Dutch gas reservoirs. PhD Thesis, University Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2000.

15.

Brown

VJ.

Radionuclides in fracking wastewater: managing a toxic blend. Environ Health Perspect 2014; 122: A50–A55.

16.

ATSDR. Public health statement: radium, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=789&tid=154 (accessed 1 March 2017).

17.

Schwartz

Klug

MG.

Incidence rates of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in US states are associated with residential radon levels. Future Oncol 2015; 12: 165–174.

18.

Canu

Laurent

Pires

et al . Health effects of naturally radioactive water ingestion: the need for enhanced studies. Environ Health Perspect 2011; 119: 1676–1680.

19.

ATSDR. Toxicological profile: radon, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp.asp?id=407&tid=71 (accessed 1 March 2017).

20.

NRC: sources of radiation, https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/around-us/sources.html (accessed 31 March 2017).

21.

Doyi

Essumang

Dampare

et al. Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (TENORM) in the oil and gas industry: a review. In: de Voogt P (Ed.) Reviews of environmental contamination and toxicology, volume 238. Switzerland: Springer, 2015, pp. 107–119.

22.

Kargbo

Wilhelm

Campbell

DJ.

Natural gas plays in the Marcellus Shale: challenges and potential opportunities. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 5679–5684.

23.

Chambers

DB.

Radiological protection in North American naturally occurring radioactive material industries. Ann ICRP 2015; 44: 202–213.

24.

Rowan

EL and

Kraemer

TF.

Radon-222 content of natural gas samples from upper and middle Devonian sandstone and shale reservoirs in Pennsylvania: preliminary data. USGS Numbered Series 2012-1159, Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

25.

Mauro

Elevated levels of naturally occurring radioactive material associated with shale gas extraction. Search and Discovery, http://www.searchanddiscovery.com/documents/2012/80266mauro/ndx_mauroo.pdf (2012, accessed 27 February 2017).

26.

Casey

Ogburn

Rasmussen

et al . Predictors of indoor radon concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013. Environ Health Perspect 2015; 123: 11301137.

27.

Gross

EL.

Distribution of indoor radon concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1990–2007. USGS Numbered Series 2013–5143, Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

28.

Price

Adams

Jr. Water use and wastewater management: interrelated issues with unique problems and solutions. In: Kaden D and Rose T (eds) Environmental and health issues in unconventional oil and gas development. Elsevier, pp. 61–79.

29.

Walter

Benke

Pickett

DA.

Effect of biogas generation on radon emissions from landfills receiving radium-bearing waste from shale gas development. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 2012; 62: 1040–1049.

30.

Smith

Arnish

Williams

et al . Assessment of the disposal of radioactive petroleum industry waste in nonhazardous landfills using risk-based modeling. Environ Sci Technol 2003; 37: 2060–2066.

31.

ALNabhani

Khan

Yang

Scenario-based risk assessment of TENORM waste disposal options in oil and gas industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2016; 40: 55–66.

32.

Zhang

Gregory

Hammack

et al . Co-precipitation of radium with barium and strontium sulfate and its impact on the fate of radium during treatment of produced water from unconventional gas extraction. Environ Sci Technol 2014; 48: 4596–4603.

33.

Fakhru’l-Razi

Pendashteh

Abdullah

et al . Review of technologies for oil and gas produced water treatment. J Haz Mater 2009; 170: 530–551.

34.

Rowan

Engle

Kirby

et al.

Radium content of oil-and gas-field produced waters in the Northern Appalachian Basin (USA): summary and discussion of data. USGS Numbered Series 2011-5135, Reston, VA: U.S. Geological Survey.

35.

Shams

Bradley

Alshammari

et al . A review of the evaluation of TENORM levels at the produced water lagoon of the Minagish oil field using high-resolution gamma-ray spectrometry. Radiat Phys Chem 2017; 140: 122–126.

36.

Da Silva

FCA

Bradley

Regan

et al . Measurement of the total activity concentrations of Libyan oil scale. Radiat Phys Chem 2017; 137: 198–202.

37.

Warner

Christie

Jackson

et al . Impacts of shale gas wastewater disposal on water quality in western Pennsylvania. Environ Sci Technol 2013; 47: 11849–11857.

38.

Zhang

Vidic

RD.

Co-treatment of abandoned mine drainage and Marcellus Shale flowback water for use in hydraulic fracturing. Water Res 2016; 104: 425–431.

39.

El Afifi

Awwad

NS.

Characterization of the TE-NORM waste associated with oil and natural gas production in Abu Rudeis, Egypt. J Environ Radioact 2005; 82: 7–19.

40.

Paranhos Gazineu

de Araújo

Brandão

et al . Radioactivity concentration in liquid and solid phases of scale and sludge generated in the petroleum industry. J Environ Radioact 2005; 81: 47–54.

41.

Hilal

Attallah

Mohamed

et al . Evaluation of radiation hazard potential of TENORM waste from oil and natural gas production. J Environ Radioact 2014; 136: 121–126.

42.

McDermott-Levy

Kaktins

Sattler

Fracking, the environment, and health. Am J Nurs 2013; 113: 45–51.

43.

North Dakota Department of Health. Argonne National Laboratory (ANL) TENORM study, http://www.ndhealth.gov/ehs/tenorm/ArgonneStudy/NDDoH%20SUMMARY%20OF%20TENORM%20STUDY-v.FINAL.pdf (2014, accessed 27 February 2017).

44.

Glass Geltman

LeClair

Regulation of oil & gas wastes containing TENORM, http://lawatlas.org/datasets/regulation-of-wastes-containing-tenorm (2017, accessed 28 February 2017).

45.

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and federal facilities, https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/resource-conservation-and-recovery-act-rcra-and-federal-facilities (accessed 19 May 2017).

46.

International Association of Oil and Gas Producers. Guidelines for the management of naturally occurring radioactive material (NORM) in the oil & gas industry. Report no. 412, International Association of Oil and Gas Producers, http://www.rp-alba.com/resources/412.pdf (2008, accessed 27 February 2017).

47.

Ellsworth

WL.

Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 2013; 341: 1225942.

48.

Attallah

Hamed

El Afifi

et al . Removal of 226Ra and 228Ra from TENORM sludge waste using surfactants solutions. J Environ Radioact 2015; 139: 78–84.

49.

Fractracker

1.7 million wells in the U.S.—a 2015 update, https://www.fractracker.org/2015/08/1-7-million-wells/ (2015, accessed 10 March 2017).

50.

U.S. Energy Information Administration. Natural gas gross withdrawals, https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_sum_a_EPG0_FGW_mmcf_a.htm (accessed 27 March 2017).

51.

Texas Administrative Code, Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 289, Subchapter F, Rule §289.259(d) 11 April 1999.

52.

New Mexico Code of Regulations § 20.3.14.

53.

Louisiana Administrative Code, Title 33, Part XV § 1401.

54.

Kansas Administrative Regulations § 28-29-1604.

55.

DiGiulio

Jackson

RB.

Impact to underground sources of drinking water and domestic wells from production well stimulation and completion practices in the Pavilion, Wyoming, field. Environ Sci Technol 2016; 50: 4524–4536.

56.

Development of TENORM rules for the state of Montana, https://deq.mt.gov/Portals/112/Land/SolidWaste/Documents/docs/TENORMReportFinal.pdf (2016, accessed 20 March 2017).

57.

Michigan TENORM Advisory Panel, https://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/deq-RMG-TENORM_Disposal_Advisory_Panel_White_Paper_-_FINAL_481404_7.pdf (2014–2015, accessed 20 March 2017).

58.

Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. Final guidance document on radioactivity monitoring at solid waste processing and disposal facilities, http://www.elibrary.dep.state.pa.us/dsweb/Get/Document-48337/250-3100-001.pdf (accessed 13 November 2016).

59.

Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Interim policy and guidance pending rulemaking for control and disposition of technologically-enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials in Colorado, https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/HM_tenorm-Interim-Policy-and-Guidance-Pending-Rulemaking-for-Control-and-Disposition-of-Technologically-Enhanced-Naturally-Occurring-Radioactive-Materials-in-Colorado_0.pdf (2007, accessed 2 March 2017).

60.

Harto

Smith

Kamboj

et al . Radiological dose and risk assessment of landfill disposal of technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials (tenorm) in North Dakota. Report no. ANL/EVS-14/13, Argonne National Laboratory, https://www.osti.gov/scitech/biblio/1164520/ (2014, accessed February 27, 2017).

61.

Zhang

Zheng

et al . Management of Marcellus shale produced water in Pennsylvania: a review of current strategies and perspectives. Energy Technol 2014; 2: 968–976.

62.

El Afifi

Awwad

Hilal

MA.

Sequential chemical treatment of radium species in TENORM waste sludge produced from oil and natural gas production. J Hazard Mater 2009; 161: 907–912.

63.

Tennessee Comprehensive Rules and Regulations 0400-54-01-.03.

64.

Tennessee Comprehensive Rules and Regulations 0400-20-05-.120.

65.

Idaho Administrative Code 58.01.10.

66.

Belcher

Resnikoff

Hydraulic fracturing radiological concerns for Ohio, http://www.rwma.com/OHIO_FACT_SHEET_6-13-13.pdf (2013, accessed 24 February 2017).

67.

Senate Bill 786, General Assembly of North Carolina, Session 2013, http://www.ncleg.net/Session.s/2013/Bills/Senate/PDF/S786v7.pdf (accessed 11 January 2017).

68.

Texas Administrative Code, Title 16, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter F, Rule §4.611, 3 March 2003.

69.

ALNabhani

Khan

Yang

The importance of public participation in legislation of TENORM risk management in the oil and gas industry. Process Saf Environ Prot 2016; 102: 606–614.

70.

Nabhani

Khan

Yang

Dynamic modeling of TENORM exposure risk during drilling and production. J Pet Explor Prod Technol. Epub ahead of print 23 February 2017. DOI: 10.1007/s13202-017-0325-3.

71.

Nabhani

Khan

Yang

Technologically enhanced naturally occurring radioactive materials in oil and gas production: a silent killer. Process Saf Environ Prot 2016; 99: 237–247.

72.

TENORM in KY landfills: loopholes, questionable business practices, http://www.publicnewsservice.org/2016-08-03/environment/tenorm-in-ky-landfills-loopholes-questionable-business-practices/a53347-1 (accessed 29 March 2017).

73.

Moran

License to dump. Environmental Advocates of New York, http://www.eany.org/sites/default/files/documents/license_to_dump.pdf (2015, accessed 4 April 2017).

74.

Connecticut General Statutes § 22a-472(a)-(g).

75.

Fractracker

Where does the waste from PA’s Marcellus wells go? https://www.fractracker.org/2012/03/where-does-the-waste-from-pas-marcellus-wells-go/ (2012, accessed 28 March 2017).