Mining is a source of extraordinary wealth, but its benefits often do not accrue to the workers and communities most involved. This paper presents two case studies of mining in South Africa to reflect on the history and legacy of mining both through observation and through the voices of affected communities. Interviews and observations on field visits to the platinum and gold mining areas of South Africa in the immediate aftermath of the Marikana massacre highlight this legacy—including vast quantities of tailings dumps and waste rock, lakes of polluted water and a devastated physical and social environment, high unemployment, high rates of occupational injury and disease including silicosis with co-morbidities, absent social security, and disrupted rural and agricultural communities. Exploitative conditions of work and the externalization of the health and environmental costs of mining will require international solidarity, robust independent trade unions, and a commitment to human rights.
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa. Institutional hearing: business and labour. Mining industry. Report, Volume 4, Chapter 2, pp.33–36, 1998. Cape Town, South Africa: Juta & Co Ltd.
2.
CallinicosL. Gold and workers: 1886–1924, Johannesburg, South Africa: Raven Press, 1980.
3.
TerblancheS. A history of inequality in South Africa 1652–2002, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa: University of KwaZulu Natal Press, 2002.
4.
MurrayJDaviesTReesD. Occupational lung disease in the South African mining industry: research and policy implementation. J Public Health Policy2011; 32(S1): S65–S79. www.palgrave-journals.com/jphp/ (accessed 28 November 2015).
5.
NorgateTHaqueN. Using life cycle assessment to evaluate some environmental impacts of gold production. J Clean Prod2012; 29–30: 53–63.
6.
GlaisterBJMuddGM. The environmental costs of platinum–PGM mining and sustainability: is the glass half-full or half-empty?Miner Eng2010; 23: 438–450.
7.
DurandJF. The impact of gold mining on the Witwatersrand on the rivers and karst system of Gauteng and North West Province South Africa. J Afr Earth Sci2012; 68: 24–43.
8.
EhrlichR. A century of miners compensation in South Africa. Am J Ind Med2012; 55: 560–569.
9.
LadouJ. Workers compensation reform. Int J Occup Environ Health2012; 18: 92–95.
10.
Van Zyl H, Bond-Smith M, Minter T, et al. Financial provisions for rehabilitation and closure in South African mining: discussion document on challenges and recommended improvements. Cape Town, South Africa: WWF-World Wide Fund for Nature (Formerly World Wildlife Fund), 2012, www.wwf.org.za.
11.
BellT. The Marikana massacre: why heads must roll. New Solut2015; 25: 440–450.
McCullochJ. Sleights of hand: South Africa’s gold mines and occupational disease. New Solut2015; 25: 469–479.
17.
EhrlichRReesD. Reforming miners’ lung disease compensation in South Africa – long overdue but what are the options?New Solut2015; 25: 451–468.
18.
Mine Closure 2008. Fourie AB, Tibbett M, Weiersbye IM, Dye PJ (eds). S. Chevrel et al. A remote sensing and GIS based integrated approach for risk based prioritization of gold tailing facilities – Witwatersrand, South Africa (p. 640). Perth, Australia: Australian Centre for Geomechanics, 2008.
Department of Water Affairs (DWAF). Mine water management in the Witwatersrand gold fields with special emphasis on acid mine drainage report to the inter-ministerial committee on acid mine drainage, http://www.dwaf.gov.za/Documents/ACIDReport.pdf (2010, accessed 31 January 2013).
Van EedenESLiefferinkMDurandJF. Legal issues concerning mine closure and social responsibility on the West Rand. J Transdisciplin Res South Afr2009; 5: 51–71.
Bench Marks Foundation. PG6: communities in the platinum minefields. Policy gap 6: a review of platinum mining in the Bojanala district of the North West Province. Johannesburg, South Africa, Bench Marks Foundation.
29.
Bench Marks Foundation. PG7: coping with unsustainability. Policy gap 7: Lonmin 2003–2012, http://www.bench-marks.org.za/ (2013, accessed November 2015).
