How Consistent Are Winning Strategies? The Role of Competitor Analysis and Budgets on Performance in a Simulation

Abstract

This article looks at the role of competitor analysis in the development of marketing strategies in a business simulation. It is, in part, a replication of an earlier study by Green and Faria that indicated that good strategic decisions are, on the whole, successful even when actions of competitors are ignored completely. The current study, based on the MARKSTRAT2 simulation, confirmed the results of Green and Faria in that the strategies continued to be successful in an environment with different competitors. However, in the rerun situation, the winning strategies did not deliver the profits necessary to earn the budget levels achieved in the original run of the simulation, and the original strategies could only be pursued by providing additional funding. In this sense, it is clear that in the reruns, the original strategies were less successful, thus supporting the notion that competitor analysis is an important step in strategy development.

Keywords

robustness of strategies strategy replication

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

COMPETE: A dynamic marketing simulation. Faria, A. J. , Nulsen, R. O. , Roussos, D. S. (1994). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.

Curren, M. T. , Folkes, V. S. , Steckel, J. H. (1992). Explanations for successful and unsuccessful marketing decisions: The decision maker’s perspective. Journal of Marketing, 56, 18-31.

Day, G. S. (1990). Market driven strategy: Processes for creating value. New York: Free Press.

Gatignon, H. (1987). Strategic studies in Markstrat2. Journal of Business Research, 15, 469-480.

Green, D. , Faria, A. J. (1995). Are good strategies consistently good? Developments in Business Simulation Experiential Exercises, 22, 31-37.

Hamel, G. , Prahalad, C. K. (1994). Competing for the future. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Johnson, G. , Scholes, K. (1997). Exploring corporate strategy: Text and cases(4th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

Larréché, Jean-Claude . (1987). On simulations in business education and research. Journal of Business Research, 15, 559-571.

MARKSTRAT2: A marketing simulation game. Larréché, J-C. , Gatignon, H. (1990). Palo Alto, CA: Scientific Press (507 Seaport Court, Redwood City, CA 94063-2731, USA).

10.

Neal, D. J. (1995, July 3-7). Competitiveness and business success: The case for realism vs. fairness in a business simulation. In MEG conference proceedings(pp. 538-548). Bradford, England: Marketing Educators Group, Bradford University.

11.

Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.

12.

Quinn, J. B. , Mintzberg, H. , James, R. M. (1988). The strategy process: Concepts, contexts and cases. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

13.

Whittington, R. (1993). What is strategy—and does it matter? New York: Routledge.