The variety and user-friendliness of computer-based games available to the strategic management instructor has increased, although the number of commercially available games has fallen due to a number of factors. Based on the criterion of objectively measured learning outcomes, the various games studied over the years produce genuine results and results that are superior to those obtained via the case approach, which is the major alternative teaching strategy. Far less research has been conducted on game-facilitating factors that lead to effective learning outcomes in a business game environment.
Anderson, P. H.
, & Lawton, L. (1992). The relationship between financial performance and other measures of learning on a simulation exercise. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 326-340.
2.
Assa, I.
(1982). Management simulation games for education and research: A comparative study of gaming in socialist countries. Simulation & Games, 13, 379-412.
3.
Barker, J. R.
, Temple, C. S., & Sloane, H. M. (1988). WISE: The international simulation exercise for management development. Lexington, MA: Temple, Barker & Sloane (33 Hayden Ave., Lexington, MA, 02173 USA).
4.
Bass, B. M.
(1964). Business gaming for organizational research. Management Science, 10, 545-546.
5.
Boseman, F. G.
, & Schellenberger, R. E. (1974). Business gaming: An empirical appraisal. Simulation & Games, 5, 383-402.
6.
Burgess, T. F.
(1991). The use of computerized management and business simulation in the United Kingdom. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 174-195.
7.
THE BUSINESS GAME. Mills, L. W., & McDowell, D. B. (1985). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (out of print).
8.
THE BUSINESS MANAGEMENT LABORATORY. Jensen, R. L., & Cherrington, D. J. (1977). Plano, TX: Business Publications (out of print).
9.
THE BUSINESS POLICY GAME. Cotter, R. V., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1995). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (Faculty Services Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458 USA).
10.
THE BUSINESS STRATEGY GAME
. Thompson, A. A. Jr., & Stappenbeck, G. J. (1990). THE B USINESS STRATEGY GAME: A global industry simulation. Homewood, IL: Irwin (Faculty Services Department, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458 USA).
11.
THE CARNEGIE-TECH MANAGEMENT GAME
. Cohen, K. J., Dill, W. R., Kuehn, A. A., & Winters, R. R. (1964). THE CARNEGIE-TECH MANAGEMENT GAME: An experiment in business education. Homewood, IL: Irwin (out of print).
12.
Catalanello, R. F
, & Brenenstuhl, D. C. (1977). An assessment of the effect of experiential simulation and discussion pedagogies used in laboratory sections of an introductory management course. In C. C. Nielsen (Ed.), New horizons in simulation games and experiential learning (pp. 51-58). Wichita, KS: Wichita State University.
13.
Couger, J. D.
(1972). Widespread use of simulation games. Computing Newsletter, 6, 1-2.
14.
Dale, A. G.
, & Klasson, C. R. (1964). Business gaming: A survey of American collegiate schools of business. Austin: University of Texas Press.
15.
Deep, S. D.
, Bass, B. M., & Vaughn, J. A. (1967). Some effects on business gaming of previous quasi-T group affiliations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 426-431.
16.
ENSIM. Gooding, C. (1976). Decision making under environmental constraints: A management simulation game. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia.
17.
Estes, J. E.
(1979). Research on the effectiveness of using a computerized simulation in the basic management course. In S. C. Certo & D. C. Brenenstuhl (Eds.), Insights into experiential pedagogy (pp. 25-28). Tempe: Arizona State University.
18.
THE EXECUTIVE GAME. Henshaw, R. C. Jr., & Jackson, J. R. (1972). Homewood, IL: Irwin (out of print).
19.
THE EXECUTIVE GAME. Henshaw, R. C. Jr., & Jackson, J. R. (1990). Homewood, IL: Irwin (out of print).
20.
THE EXECUTIVE SIMULATION. Keys, J. B., & Leftwich, H. (1977). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/ Hunt (out of print).
21.
Faria, A. J.
(1986). A test of student performance and attitudes under varying game conditions. In A. C. Burns & L. Kelley (Eds.), Insights into experiential pedagogy (pp.70-74). Stillwater: Oklahoma State University Press.
22.
Faria, A. J.
, & Wellington, W. J. (1996). The relationship between interpersonal and task cohesiveness and performance in a business simulation game. In A. L. Patz & J. K. Butler Jr. (Eds.), Insights into experiential exercises (pp. 29-35). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
23.
Frazer, J. R.
(1975). Business decision simulation: A time-sharing approach. Reston, VA: Reston.
24.
Fritzsche, D. J.
(1987). The impact of personal computers in business educational simulations. Simulation & Games, 18, 176-191.
25.
Gagnon, J. H.
(1987). Mary M. Birshtein: The mother of Soviet simulation gaming. Simulation & Games, 18, 3-12.
26.
Gidrovich, S. R.
(1989, March). Planning games and new economic conditions. Paper presented at the International Simulation and Gaming Association, Weimar, East Germany.
27.
Graham, R. G.
, & Gray, C. F. (1969). Business games handbook. New York: American Management Association.
28.
Greenlaw, P. S.
, & Wyman, F. P. (1973). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses. Simulation & Games, 4, 259-294.
29.
Hemmasi, M.
, & Graf, L. A. (1992). Managerial skills acquisition: A case for using business policy simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 298-310.
30.
Hoskins, W. R.
(1989). Thunderbird international management simulation: Manager manual. Phoenix, AR: Thunderbird Software (16021 North 10th Street, Phoenix, AZ 85022 USA).
31.
Hsu, E.
(1989). Role-event gaming simulation in management education: A conceptual framework and review. Simulation & Games, 20, 409-438.
32.
IMAGINIT
. Barton, R. F. (1973). The IMAGINIT management game. Lubbock, TX: Active Learning (out of print).
33.
INTOP
. Thorelli, H. B., & Graves, R. L. (1989). INTOP classic PC. Bloomington: Indiana University Press (out of print).
34.
Jensen, R. L.
(1996). The business management laboratory. Little Rock, AR: Micro Business.
35.
Kaufman, F. L.
(1976a). Computer-based business game in senior collegiate "capstone "course. Proceedings of the Association for Educational Data Systems, pp. 231-235.
36.
Kaufman, F L.
(1976b). An empirical study of the usefulness of a computer-based business game. Journal of Educational Data Processing, 13, 13-22.
37.
Kaufman, F. L.
(1978). Graduates compare effectiveness of business game with textbook cases in capstone course. Journal of Educational Data Processing, 15, 26-35.
38.
Keefe, M. J.
, & Cozan, C. (1985). Popular management simulations: Why some simulations succeed and others fail. ABSEL News & Views, 5, 6-7.
39.
Keefe, M. J.
, Dyson, D. A., & Edwards, R. R. (1993). Strategic management simulations: A current assessment. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 363-368.
40.
Keys, J. B.
, & Bell, R. R. (1977). A comparative evaluation of the management of learning grid applied to the business policy learning environment. Journal of Management, 3, 33-39.
41.
Keys, J. B.
, & Wells, R. (1997). The multinational management game: A simuworld of global strategy. Little Rock, AR: Micro Business.
42.
Keys, J. B.
, & Wolfe, J. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16, 307-336.
43.
Klasson, C. R.
(1964). Business gaming: A progress report. Academy of Management Journal, 7, 175-188.
44.
Kolb, D. A.
, Rubin, I. M., & McIntyre, J. M. (1974). Organizational psychology: An experiential approach. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
45.
Kolesnikov, S. P.
, & Shepkin, A. B. (1989, March). Simulation of modeling of competition mechanism in the "Kondurs" management game. Paper presented at the International Simulation and Gaming Association, Weimar, East Germany.
46.
Low, J. T.
(1980). Guidelines for the use of business simulation games. Journal of Marketing Education, 3, 30-37.
47.
A MANAGEMENT EXPERIENCE. Jensen, R. L. (1990). Homewood, IL: Irwin (out of print).
48.
MANSYM. Schellenberger, R. E. (1965). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown (out of print).
49.
MANSYM IV
. Schellenberger, R. E., & Masters, L. A. (1986). MANSYM IV: A dynamic management simulation with decision support system. New York: John Wiley (out of print).
50.
McKenna, R. J.
(1991). Business computerized simulation: The Australian experience. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 36-62.
51.
McKenney, J. L.
, & Dill, W. R. (1966). Influences on learning in simulation games. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 28-32.
52.
McNair, M. P.
(1954). The case method at the Harvard Business School. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
Miesing, P.
(1982). Group processes, decision-making styles and team performance in a complex simulation game. In D. J. Fritzsche & L. A. Graf (Eds.), Developments in business simulation and experiential exercises (pp. 228-231). Normal: Illinois State University Press.
54.
Miles, W. G. Jr.
, Biggs, W. D., & Schubert, J. N. (1986). Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and a general management simulation: A comparison. Simulation & Games, 17,7-24.
55.
THE MULTINATIONAL MANAGEMENT GAME
. Keys, J. B., Edge, A. G., & Wells, R. (1991). THE MULTINATIONAL MANAGEMENT GAME: Student's manual. Homewood, IL: Irwin (out of print).
56.
Norris, D. R.
, & Niebuhr, R. E. (1980). Group variables and gaming success. Simulation & Games, 11, 301-312.
57.
Pearce, J. A. II
. (1978-1979). Developing business policy skills: A report on alternatives. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 7, 361-371.
58.
Pratt, R.J.A.
(1967). Business gaming in education. Pittsburgh Business Review, 37, 13-14.
59.
Raia, A. P.
(1966). A study of the educational value of management games. Journal of Business, 39, 339-352.
60.
Remus, W. E.
(1977). Who likes business games?Simulation & Games, 8, 64-68.
61.
Remus, W. E.
, & Jenner, S. (1981). Playing business games: Expectations and realities. Simulation & Games, 12, 480-488.
62.
Richards, M. D.
, & Kniffen, F. W. (1960). Business games-A new management tool. Pennsylvania Business Survey, 1 (6): 4-9.
63.
Schellenberger, R. E.
(1974, November). Analysis of decision processes using an interactive case: A preliminary study. Paper presented at the Eastern Academy of Management, College Park, MD.
64.
Schriesheim, C. A.
, & Schriesheim, J. (1974, August). Divergence of practitioner opinion and empirical evidence: The case of business simulation games. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
65.
Steiner, G. A.
, Miner, J. B., & Gray, E. R. (1982). Management policy and strategy. New York: Macmillan.
66.
STRATEGY! Priesmeyer, H. R. (1987). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western (out of print).
67.
STRATPLAN
. Hinton, R. W., & Smith, D. C. (1985). STRATPL4N: Participant's guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall (out of print).
68.
Summer, C. E.
, & O'Connell, J. (1973). The managerial mind. Homewood, IL: Irwin.
69.
Teach, R. D.
, & Govahi, G. (1993). The role of classroom techniques in teaching management skills. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 429-445.
70.
TEMPOMATIC IV. Scott, C. R., & Strickland, A. J. (1974). Boston: Houghton Mifflin (out of print).
71.
Wellington, W. J.
, & Faria, A. J. (1996). Team cohesion, player attitude, and performance expectations in simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 27, 23-40.
72.
Wellington, W. J.
, & Faria, A. J. (1997). The impact of an artificial market leader on simulation competitors' strategies. In J. K. Butler Jr. & N. H. Leonard (Eds.), Insights into experiential learning (pp. 152-157). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
73.
Wellington, W. J.
, Faria, A. J., & Whiteley, T. R. (1997). Consistency in simulation performance over time and across simulation games. In J. K. Butler Jr. & N. H. Leonard (Eds.), Insights into experiential learning (pp. 146-151). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
74.
Wheatley, W. J.
, Hornaday, R. W., & Hunt, T. G. (1988). Developing strategic management goal setting skills. Simulation & Games, 19 (2): 173-185.
75.
Wheelan, D. L.
, & Hunger, J. D. (1983). Strategic management and business policy. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
76.
Whitely, T. R.
, & Faria, A. J. (1997). An analysis of student attitudes, performance, and strategies in a simulation competition based on a controlled product-market entry game structure. In J. K. Butler Jr. & N. H. Leonard (Eds.), Insights into experiential learning (pp. 197-202). Madison, WI: Omnipress.
77.
Wolfe, J.
(1975). A comparative evaluation of the experiential approach as a business policy learning environment. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 442-452.
78.
Wolfe, J.
(1976a). Correlates and measures of the external validity of computer-based business policy decision-making environments. Simulation & Games, 7,411-438.
79.
Wolfe, J.
(1976b). The effects and effectiveness of simulations in business policy teaching applications. Academy of Management Review, 1, 47-56.
80.
Wolfe, J.
(1978). The effects of game complexity on the acquisition of business policy knowledge. Decision Sciences, 9 (1): 143-155.
81.
Wolfe, J.
(1985). The teaching effectiveness of games in collegiate business courses: A 1973-1983 update. Simulation & Games, 16, 251-288.
82.
Wolfe, J.
(1991). On the transfer of market-oriented business games to Eastern bloc cultures. Social Science Computer Review, 9, 202-214.
83.
Wolfe, J.
(1993). A history of business teaching games in English-speaking and post-socialist countries: The origination and diffusion of a management education and development technology. Simulation & Gaming, 24, 446-463.
84.
Wolfe, J.
, Bowen, D. D., & Roberts, C. R. (1989). Team building effects on company performance: A business game-based study. Simulation & Games, 20, 388-408.
85.
Wolfe, J.
, & Chacko, T. I. (1983). Team-size effects on business game performance and decision-making behaviors. Decision Sciences, 14, 121-133.
86.
Wolfe, J.
, & Guth, G. R. (1975). The case approach versus gaming in the teaching of business policy: An experimental evaluation. Journal of Business, 48, 349-364.
87.
Zuckerman, D. W.
, & Horn, R. E. (1973). The guide to simulations/games for education and training. Lexington, MA: Information Resources.
