The purpose of this article is to review the formal process of simulation and game activity as it may interact with formal and informal organizational variables in the school. In addition to procedures of evaluation occurring before and after simulation/gaming activity, this article also considers the impact of organizational variables and informal interactions at play in the adoption, implementation, and maintenance of simulation and game activity.
Alessi, S. M.
, & Johnson, L. A. (1992). Simulations for dental licensure examinations: Reliability and validity. Simulation/Games for Learning, 22(4), 286-307.
2.
Benson, J. K.
(1982). A framework for policy analysis. In D. L. Rogers & D. A. Whitten (Eds.), Interorganizational coordination (pp. 137-176). Ames: Iowa State University Press.
3.
Blase, J. J.
(1989). The micropolitics of the school: The everyday political orientation of teachers towards open schools principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 25(4), 377-407.
4.
Bloom, B. S.
(1984, May). The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Leadership, pp. 4-17.
5.
Burlingame, M.
(1988). The politics of education and educational policy: The local level. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 439-451). New York: Longman.
6.
Collins, A.
(1991). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 28-36.
7.
Conley, D. T.
(1991). What is restructuring? Educators adapt to a changing world. Equity and Choice, 7(2/3), 46-51.
8.
Corbeil, P.
, Laveault, D., & Saint-Germain, M. (1989). Games and simulation activity: Tools for international development education. Hull, Quebec: Canadian International Development Agency.
9.
Corbett, H.
, Dickson, F., William, A., & Rossman, G. B. (1987). Resistance to planned change and the sacred in school cultures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 36-59.
10.
Davaud, C.
, & Cardinet, J. (1992). La problématique des épreuves communes [The problem issue of uniform classroom tests]. In D. Laveault (Ed.), Les pratiques d'évaluation en éducation (pp. 167-181). Montreal: Éditions de l'ADMÉÉ.
11.
Dworkin, A. G.
(1987). Teachers burnout in public schools: Structural causes and consequences for children. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
12.
Eicholz, G.
, & Rogers, E. (1964). Resistance to the adoption of audio-visual aids by elementary school teachers. In M. Miles (Ed.), Innovation in education (pp. 299-316). New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Greenblat, C. S.
(1975). Gaming-simulation for teaching and training: An overview. In C. S. Greenblat & R. D. Duke (Eds.), Gaming-simulation: Rationale, design and applications (pp. 180-195). New York: John Wiley.
14.
Greenblat, C. S.
(1988). Designing games and simulations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Hanson, M. E.
(1991). Educational administration and organizational behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
16.
Havelock, R.
(1971). Planning for innovation through dissimination and utilization of knowledge. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
17.
Hilfiker, L.
(1969). Relationship of school system innovativeness to selected dimensions of interpersonal behavior in eight school systems. Madison, WI: Center for Cognitive Learning.
18.
Hope, A. F.
(1992). An investigation of the relationships between organizational-cultural linkages and teachers' stages of concern toward a policy implementation. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 28(1), 9-26.
19.
Huberman, M. A.
(1973). Understanding change in education: An introduction (Experiences and Innovations in Education No. 4). Paris: UNESCO, International Bureau of Education.
20.
Laveault, D.
, & Corbeil, P. (1990). Assessing the impact of simulation games on learning: A step-by-step approach. Simulation/Games for Learning, 20 (1), 42-54.
21.
Likert, R.
(1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Miles, M.B.
(1964a). Educational innovation: The nature of the problem. In M. B. Miles (Ed.), Innovation in education (pp. 1-47). New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Miles, M. B.
(1964b). Innovations in education: Some generalizations. In M. B. Miles (Ed.), Innovation in education (pp. 631-662). New York: Teachers College Press.
24.
Norris, D. R.
, & Snyder, C. A. (1982). External validation of simulation games. Simulation & Games, 20 (1), 42-54.
25.
Owens, R. G.
(1991). Organizational behaviour in schools. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Ron, A.
(1977, March). Actors and stage directors in teaching. Iyunim Bekhinuch, 14, 167-172.
27.
Stahl, A.
(1992). Personal and cultural factors interfering with the effective use of individual and group learning methods. Journal of Educational Thought, 26(1), 22-32.
28.
Shubik, M.
(1989). Gaming: Theory and practice, past and future. Simulation & Games, 20(2), 184-189.
29.
Thatcher, D. C.
(1990). Promoting learning through games and simulations. Simulation & Games, 21(3), 262-273.
30.
Watson, G.
(1969). Resistance to change. In W. Bennis, K. D. Benne, & R. Chin (Eds.), The planning of change (pp. 488-498). New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
31.
Willower, D. J.
(1991a). Micropolitics and the sociology of school organizations. Education and the Urban Society, 23, 442-454.
32.
Willower, D. J.
(1991b). School reform and schools as organizations. Journal of School Leadership, 1, 305-315.
