The RECEPTION GAME is an exercise for teaching ordinary social conversational skills to adult foreign language learners who use such skills in their professional work at posts abroad. Of all the tasks carried out in the target language at post, learners claim to experience the most difficulty participating in ordinary social conversation. The properties of ordinary social conversation imply that language learners practice following unpredictable turns in topic, displaying involvement, and producing unplanned speech. Challenges for teaching social conversation lie with classroom interactional patterns whose characteristic turn-taking structure is unlike that of ordinary social conversation. This design for teaching conversational skills-combining elements of simulation and experiential learning-takes into account conversation's rapport-building function, turn-taking mechanisms, and open-ended structure, as well as listening demands for following rapid shifts in topic and displaying understanding and involvement in the interaction.
Carroll, R.
(1988). Cultural misunderstandings (C. Volk, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Cram, B.
(1992). Training learners for self-assessment. TESOL in Context [Newsletter], 30-33.
3.
Donaldson, S. K.
(1979). One kind of speech act: How do we know when we're conversing?Semiotica, 28, 3-4.
4.
Goffman, E.
(1981). Replies and responses. In Forms of talk (pp. 5-77). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
5.
Goodwin, C.
(1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
6.
Hoffman, C.
(1994, April). Language training in the context of diplomacy for global competitiveness at the Foreign Service Institute. Paper presented at the 13th Annual Conference on Languages and Communication for World Business and the Professions, Ypsilanti, MI.
7.
Kohonen, V.
(1992). Experiential language learning: Second language learning as cooperative learner education. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Collaborative language learning and teaching (pp. 14-39). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Levinson, S. C.
(1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9.
McHoul, A.
(1978). The organization of turns at formal talk in the classroom. Language in Society, 7, 183-213.
10.
Mehan, H.
(1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 119-131). London: Academic Press.
11.
Richards, J. C.
(1990). The language teaching matrix. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Sacks, H.
, Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696-735.
13.
Watson, D. R.
, & Sharrock, W. W. (1990). Realities in simulation/gaming. In D. Crookall & R. L. Oxford (Eds.), Simulation, gaming, and language learning (pp. 231-238). New York: Newbury.
14.
West, C.
, & Zimmerman, D. H. (1977). Conversation analysis. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 506-541). New York: Cambridge University Press.
