Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Good educators constantly seek curricula materials and learning experiences which have clearly delineated attributes and proven effectiveness. This article provides an evaluation of the processes involved in the simulation/game CRISIS. Despite its age, this simulation/game remains an excellent, topical, short, relatively simple, interdisciplinary, noncomputer experiential activity for conveying a realistic "gestalt" and providing a basic understanding of the complexity of international political relations. This is evidenced by the results of multivariate analysis of the responses of 146 participants from five major discipline areas to a highly reliable 12-scale Simulation Evaluation Instrument, and by content-analysis of their open-ended responses concerning the game's strengths and weaknesses. The author discusses the management implications of the latter and provides game follow-up suggestions for enhancing learning.

Keywords

communication CRISIS decision making effectiveness evaluation international relations research methodology simulation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Brecher, M. , & Wilkenfeld, J. (1989). Crisis, conflict and instability. Oxford: Pergamon.

Brecher, M. , Wilkenfeld, J. , & Moser, S. (1988). Crises in the twentieth century. Vol 1: Handbook of International Crises. Oxford: Pergamon.

Brooker, R. G. (1988). Truth as a variable: Teaching political strategy with simulation games. Simulation & Games, 19, 43-58.

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.

Deutsch, M. (1987). A theoretical perspective on conflict and conflict resolution. In D.J.D. Sandole & I. Sandole-Staroste (Eds.), Conflict management and problem solving: Interpersonal to international applications. London: Frances Pinter.

Dodge, D. (1978). Simulation review - CRISIS. Simulation & Games, 9, 107-108.

Evans, N. (1987). Assessing experiential learning: A review of progress and practice. York, England: Longman.

Greenblat, C. S. (1989). Extending the range of experience. In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

Hass, M. (1986). Research on International Crisis: Obsolescence of an Approach? International Interactions, 13, 23-58.

10.

Horn, R. E. , & Cleaves, A. (1980). The guide to simulations/games for education and training (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Lederman, L. C. , & Ruben, B. D. (1984). Systematic assessment of communication games and simulations: An applied framework. Communication Education, 33, 152-159.

12.

Leung, K. (1988). Some determinents of conflict avoidance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 19, 3-18.

13.

Niou, E.M.S. , & Ordeshook, P. C. (1988). A theory of the balance of power. An experimental test. Simulation & Games, 19, 415-439.

14.

Noel, R. C. , Crookall. D. , Wilkenfeld, J. , & Schapiro, L. (1987). Network gaming: A vehicle for intercultural communication. In D. Crookall , C. S. Greenblat , A. Coote , J.H.G. Klabbers , & D. R. Watson (Eds.), Simulation-gaming in the late 1980s (pp. 5-21). Oxford: Pergamon.

15.

Sandole, D.J.D. (1989a). Simulation as a basis for consciousness raising: Some encouraging signs for conflict resolution. In D. Crookall & D. Saunders (Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.

16.

Sandole, D.J.D. (1989b). Simulation in the analysis of international conflict: Accessing total systems. Simulation & Games, 20, 71-75.

17.

Scheffé, H. (1959). The analysis of variance. New York: Wiley.

18.

Snyder, T.F.F. (1985). THE OTHER SIDE [computer program]. Cambridge, MA: Tom Snyder Productions Inc.

19.

Stadsklev, R. (1974). Handbook of simulation gaming in social education. Part 1: Textbook. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama, Institute of Higher Education Research and Services.

20.

Suransky, L (1980). International relations games and simulation: An evaluation. In R. E. Horn & A. Cleaves (Eds.), The guide to simulations/games for education and training (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

21.

Warbelow, A. , & Hoffman, D. B. (1987). Graphing alternative payoffs in a conflict simulation. Simulation & Games, 18, 116-129.

22.

Watt, D. C. (1989). 1939 revisited: On theories of the origins of wars. International Affairs, 4, 685-692.

23.

Wilkenfeld, J. , Brecher, M. , & Moser, S. (1988). Crises in the twentieth century. Vol. II: Handbook of Foreign Policy Crises. Oxford: Pergamon.