In Australia, the use of computerized business simulations within tertiary institutions is a relatively new and rapidly growing phenomenon. The data suggest that 70% of adoptions have occurred since 1984 and that simulations are used in more than half of the business programs. Perceptions reflect the American experience, but the simulations are not seen to be representative of either the Australian environment or business practice. Participants enjoy taking part and rate courses using simulations more highly than other courses. The research reported here surveyed both user-instructors and the participants in a business strategy course. Three areas for further research are suggested.
Australia, Commonwealth Department of Education
(1985). Directory of Higher Education Courses 1986. Canberra: AGPS.
2.
Cotter, R. V.
& Fritzsche, D. J. (1986). Business Policy Game Player's ManualSecond Edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
Faria, A. J.
(1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation & Games, 18, 207-224.
4.
Keys, B.
(1987). Total enterprise business games. Simulation & Games, 18, 225-241.
5.
Mehrez, A.
, Reichel, A., & Olami, R. (1987). The business game versus reality: A case study in the Israeli environment. Simulation & Games, 18, 488-500.
6.
Miles, W. G., Jr.
, Biggs, W. D., & Schubert, J. N. (1986). Student perceptions of skill acquisition through cases and general management simulation: A comparison. Simulation & Games, 17, 7-24.
7.
Parasuraman, A.
(1981). Assessing the worth of business simulation games: Problems and prospects. Simulation & Games, 12, 189-200.
8.
Remus, W.
(1977). Who likes business games?Simulation & Games, 8, 469-480.
9.
Remus, W.
, & Jenner, S. (1981). Playing business games: Expectations and realities. Simulation & Games, 12,480-488.
10.
Van Oosten, R.C.H.
, & Laseur, W.J.J. (1980). The management game at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. Simulation & Games, ll, 423-439.
