The purpose of the "Simulation and Games Forum" is to provide a medium for informal and informative discussion about games and simulation. The forum may contain comments on papers previously published or may initiate a topic for discussion, unrelated to previous publications in SIMULATION & GAMES. This section is intended to generate debate and to lay out issues on which readers might differ. Communications will be published in the issue following receipt. They should be limited to 700 words and sent in letter form addressed to the Editors. We look forward to a lively section.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Glass, G.V. and B.R. Worthen (1972) "Educational evaluation and research: similarities and differences," pp. 149-165 in J. Weiss (ed.) Curriculum Evaluation: Potentiality and Reality. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Curriculum Theory Network.
2.
Henderson, B.G. and W.G. Gaines (1971) "Assessment of selected simulations and games for the social studies." Social Education35, 5: 508-513.
3.
Rosenshine, B. (1972) "Problems in the development of instruments for evaluating curricula," pp. 221-227 in J. Weiss (ed.) Curriculum Evaluation: Potentiality and Reality. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Curriculum Theory Network.
4.
Stevens, W.W., Jr., and I. Morrissett (1968) "A system for analyzing social science curricula ." Curriculum Theory Network, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education1: 28-36.
5.
Westbury, I. (1970) "Curriculum evaluation." Rev. of Educational Research40, 2: 239-260.
