Airasian, P.W. and G.F. Madaus (1972) "Criterion-referenced testing in the classroom ." NCME Measurement m Education3: 1-8.
2.
Allen, L.E. (1969) Equations-The Game of Creative Mathematics. New Haven: WFF N' PROOF.
3.
——— R.W. Allen, and J. Ross (1970) "The virtues of nonsimulation games." Simulation and Games1: 319-326.
4.
Boocock, S. S. and E. O. Schild [eds.] (1968) Simulation Games in Learning . Beverly Hills: Sage Pubns.
5.
Braskamp, L.A. and R.M. Hodgetts (1971) "The role of an objective evaluation model in simulation gaming." Simulation and Games2. 197-212.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1970) Two Worlds of Childhood. New YorkRussell Sage Foundation.
7.
Campbell, D.T. and J.C. Stanley (1966) Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago: Rand McNally .
8.
Cherryholmes, C.H. (1966) "Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulations: implications for alternative strategies." American Behavioral Scientist19 (October).
9.
Coleman, J.S. (1972) "Coleman on the Coleman Report." Educational Researcher1: 13-14.
10.
——— (1959) "Academic achievement and the structure of competition ." Harvard Educational Rev.29: 339-351.
11.
Cronbach, L.J. and L. Furby (1970) "How to measure change-or should we?" Psych. Bull.74: 68-80.
12.
Edwards, K.J. (1971a) "Students' evaluations of a business simulation game as a learning experience." Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools Report121.
13.
--- ( 1971b) "The effect of ability, achievement, and number of plays on learning from a simulation game." Johns Hopkins University Center for Social Organization of Schools Report115.
14.
--- and D.L. DeVries (forthcoming) "The effectiveness of games and teams for teaching mathematics ." Johns Hopkins Center for Social Organization of Schools Report.
15.
Farran, D.C. (1968) "Competition and learning for under achievers," pp. 191-224 in S. S. Boocock and E. O. Schild (eds.) Simulation Games in Learning. Beverly Hills: Sage Pubns.
16.
Fletcher, J.L. (1971) "Evaluation of learning in two social studies simulation games." Simulation and Games2: 259-286.
17.
Glaser, R. and D.J. Klaus (1966) "A reinforcement analysis of group performance ." Psych. Monographs, General and Applied80: 1-23.
18.
Glaser, R. and A.J. Nitko (1971) "Measurement in learning and instruction," pp. 625-670 in R. L. Thorndike (ed.) Educational Measurement. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
19.
Hamblin, R.L., D. Buckholdt, D. Ferritor, M. Kozloff, and L. Blackwell (1971) The Humanization Processes. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
20.
Lee, R.S. and A. O'Leary (1971) "Attitude and personality effects of a three-day simulation." Simulation and Games2: 309-348.
21.
Livingston, S.A. and C.S. Stoll (1972) Simulation Games: An Introduction for the Social Studies Teacher. New York: Free Press.
22.
Schild, E.O. (1968) "The shaping of strategies," pp. 143-154 in S. S. Boocock and E. O. Schild (eds.) Simulation Games in Learning. Beverly Hills : Sage Pubns.
23.
Skinner, B.F. (1969) Contingencies of Reinforcement: A Theoretical Analysis . New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts .
24.
Slater, P.E. (1965) "Contrasting correlates of group size," in I. D. Steiner and M. Fishbein (eds.) Current Studies in Social Psychology . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
25.
Spilerman, S. (1971) "Raising academic motivation in lower class adolescents: a convergence of two research traditions." Sociology of Education44: 103-118.
26.
Stanley, J.C. (1971) "Do non-simulation games raise IQ.'s, whereas simulation games do not?" .Simulation and Games2: 119-122.
27.
Wodarski, J.S., R.L. Hamblin, D. Buckholdt, and D. Ferritor (1971) "Effects of individual and group contingencies on arithmetic performance." Presented at the meetings of the American Educational Research Association, New York.