Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Player behaviour comprises thoughts, decisions and other actions that arise from multiple sources and contexts in games and is based on the players’ complex environment of information, vicarious experiences and perspectives. Learning and superior performance within the game are shaped by the players’ goal orientation, conviction and interactions.

Objectives of the study

The study sought to understand the concept, functions and constituents of player behaviour from their perspectives, expectations, beliefs and traits. Recognising player behaviour in terms of its constituent elements would clarify and enhance knowledge of human behaviour and make it simple to use the understanding in deeper enquiry and applications.

Method

An instrument of 43 statements was first developed based on extant research and refined by the responses of 45 university teachers. It was then administered to 1,260 university students from whom 711 valid responses were received. The sample was processed by exploratory factor analysis under varimax rotation to yield the scale of player behaviour at a Cronbach alpha of .96 and a cumulative variance of 54 percent.

Results

The seven factors of the scale had an eigenvalue each of more than one, and Cronbach α values of .58 to .90. The exploratory factor analysis generated seven factors that were named conviction, experience sharing, uncertainty, unpredictability, insights, preparedness and planning.

Discussion

The study identified the factors of player behaviour and studied the effect of gender and education on player behaviour. It showed that player behaviour emerges from convictions which are perspectives backed by ready resources, skills and action plans to simplify, understand and respond to situations and likely problems. The behavioural differences between gender, type of programme and level of education were not significant. The study also discussed the nature of each factor and the limitations, suggestions and implications of the study.

Keywords

Conviction experience insights performance of players planning preparedness uncertainty unpredictability

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aoyagi

Fréchette

G. R.

Yuksel

(2021). Beliefs in repeated games: An experiment. 1-70. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3784841 Downloaded 30 November 2023.

Bandura

(1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

Bandura

(2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

Battigalli

Corrao

Dufwenberg

(2019). Incorporating belief-dependent motivation in games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 167, 185–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2019.04.009

Battigalli

De Vito

(2021). Beliefs, plans, and perceived intentions in dynamic games. Journal of Economic Theory, 195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jet.2021.105283

Beauregard

(2021). The entanglements of uncertainty. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 41(2), 217–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X18783038

Benson-Greenwald

T. M.

Diekman

A. B.

(2021). In the mindset of opportunity: Proactive mindset, perceived opportunities, and role attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(12), 1667–1681. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211051488

Büttner

O. B.

Wieber

Schulz

A. M.

Bayer

U. C.

Florack

Gollwitzer

P. M.

(2014). Visual attention and goal pursuit: Deliberative and implemental mindsets affect breadth of attention. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(10), 1248–1259. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214539707

Callaghan

S. J.

Lockie

R. G.

Andrews

W. A.

Chipchase

R. F.

Nimphius

(2019). The effects of an eight over cricket bowling spell upon pace bowling biomechanics and performance within different delivery lengths. Sports, 7(9), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7090200

10.

Carras

C. M.

Porter

A. M.

Van Rooij

A. J.

King

Lange

Carras

Labrique

(2018). Gamers’ insights into the phenomenology of normal gaming and game “addiction”: A mixed methods study. Computers in Human Behavior, 79, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.029

11.

Crawford

Harris

(2018). Social interactions and the influence of “extremists”. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 153, 238–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.007

12.

Crum

A. J.

Langer

E. J.

(2007). Mind-set matters: Exercise and the placebo effect. In Psychological Science, 18(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01867.x

13.

Daniau

(2016). The transformative potential of role-playing games: From play skills to human skills. Simulation & Gaming, 47(4), 423–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878116650765

14.

Davis

S. J.

(2018). Predicting unpredictability. In Nature Energy, 3(4), 257–258. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-018-0127-y

15.

Debast

van Alphen

Rossi

Tummers

J. H. A.

Bolwerk

Derksen

J. J. L.

Rosowsky

(2014). Personality traits and personality disorders in late middle and old age: Do they remain stable? A literature review. Clinical Gerontologist, 37(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317115.2014.885917

16.

Dieterich

Endrass

Kathmann

Weinberg

(2019). Unpredictability impairs goal-directed target processing and performance. Biological Psychology, 142, 29–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.007

17.

Donald

(2019). Just war? War games, war crimes, and game design. Games and Culture, 14(4), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/1555412017720359

18.

Dumblekar

Dhar

(2021a). Learning from a business simulation game: A factor-analytic study. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 11988 LNCS, 328–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72132-9_28

19.

Dumblekar

Dhar

(2021b). Perceived self-efficacy of students in a business simulation game. The Irish Journal of Management, 40(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijm-2021-0004

20.

Dumblekar

Dubey

Dhar

(2022). Development of the player satisfaction scale - A factor analytic study. Springer, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-09959-5_13

21.

Ehrlinger

Readinger

W. O.

Kim

(2016). Decision-making and cognitive biases. Encyclopedia of Mental Health, 2, 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-397045-9.00206-8

22.

Fenton-O’Creevy

Tuckett

(2021). Selecting futures: The role of conviction, narratives, ambivalence, and constructive doubt. FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE. https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.111

23.

Gneezy

Rustichini

Vostroknutov

(2010). Experience and insight in the Race game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 75(2), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.04.005

24.

Han

P. K. J.

Klein

W. M. P.

Arora

N. K.

(2011). Varieties of uncertainty in health care: A conceptual taxonomy. Medical Decision Making, 31(6), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x11393976

25.

Heiskanen

Happonen

Matschoss

Mikkonen

(2022). Learning from failures - Encouraging lesson-sharing in the Finnish energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 90, 102676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102676

26.

Housel

(2022). How people think. Collaborative Fund, May 2022. https://www.collaborativefund.com/blog/think/

27.

Huang

Yang

(2020). A metacognitive approach to reconsidering risk perceptions and uncertainty: Understand information seeking during COVID-19. Science Communication, 42(5), 616–642. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020959818

28.

Imam

Zaheer

M. K.

(2021). Shared leadership and project success: The roles of knowledge sharing, cohesion and trust in the team. International Journal of Project Management, 39(5), 463–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.02.006

29.

Kahneman

(2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Strauss, Giroux.

30.

Koens

Klijs

Weber-Sabil

Melissen

Lalicic

Mayer

Önder

Aall

(2022). Serious gaming to stimulate participatory urban tourism planning. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(9), 2167–2186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1819301

31.

Kolb

D. A.

(1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. In Experiential Learning, 8(4). Prentice-Hall.

32.

Kruger

Chen

Heitfeld

Witbart

Bruce

Pitts

D. L.

(2020). Attitudes, motivators, and barriers to emergency preparedness using the 2016 styles survey. Health Promotion Practice, 21(3), 448–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839918794940

33.

Macnamara

B. N.

Moreau

Hambrick

D. Z.

(2016). The relationship between deliberate practice and performance in sports: A meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616635591

34.

Melamed

Savage

S. V.

Munn

(2019). Uncertainty and social influence. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 5, 237802311986697. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023119866971

35.

Merguei

Strobel

Vostroknutov

(2022). Moral opportunism as a consequence of decision making under uncertainty. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 197, 624–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.03.020

36.

Miller

(2018). Futures literacy: Transforming the future. In Transforming the Future: Anticipation in the 21st Century, 1–12. Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351048002

37.

Page

S. E.

(2008). Uncertainty, difficulty, and complexity. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 20(2), 115–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629807085815

38.

Raghothama

Meijer

(2018). Rigor in gaming for design: conditions for transfer between game and reality. Simulation & Gaming, 49(3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118770220

39.

Robinson

G. M.

Hardman

Matley

R. J.

(2021). Using games in geographical and planning-related teaching: Serious games, edutainment, board games and role-play. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 4(1), 100208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100208

40.

Sekhavat

Y. A.

(2020). Collaboration or battle between minds? An attention training game through collaborative and competitive reinforcement. Entertainment Computing, 34, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2020.100360

41.

Sierra

J. J.

Hyman

M. R.

Lee

B-K.

Suh

(2015). Antecedents and consequences of extrinsic superstitious beliefs: A cross-cultural investigation. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(4), 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-01-2015-0015

42.

Sousa

Antunes

A. P.

Pinto

Zagalo

(2022). Fast serious analogue games in planning: The role of non-player participants. Simulation and Gaming, 53(2), 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781211073645

43.

Teng

(2019). How avatars create identification and loyalty among online gamers: Contextualization of self-affirmation theory. Internet Research, 29(6), 1443–1468. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-05-2018-0222

44.

Van Dijk

M. P. A.

Hale

W. W.

Hawk

S. T.

Meeus

Branje

(2020). Personality development from age 12 to 25 and its links with life transitions. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2251

45.

Wallinheimo

A-S.

Hosein

Barrie

Chemyavskiy

Agafonova

Williams

(2023). How online gaming could enhance your career prospects. Simulation & Gaming, 54(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/10468781221137361

46.

Weisberg

R. W.

(2016). Insight. In The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology. Elsevier Science Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.06214-3

47.

Young

E. S.

Frankenhuis

W. E.

Ellis

B. J.

(2020). Theory and measurement of environmental unpredictability. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(6), 550–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.08.006

48.

Zhang

Markopoulos

Schüll

(2022). Social sharing of task-related emotions in Design-Based Learning: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100378

An Empirical Study of the Constituent Factors of Player Behaviour

Abstract

Background

Objectives of the study

Method

Results

Discussion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References