Public participation has benefited from innovative engagement tools that facilitate the negotiation between diverse sets of stakeholders with different planning perspectives. Our objective is to test and evaluate the use of a fast Serious Game (SG) to support a participation process in the context of a conference on urban mobility. We also aim to explore how these analogue games engage Player Participants (PPs) and Non-Player Participants (NPPs).
Methodology
We developed an empirical approach where a fast analogue planning game was designed and deployed to support discussions during a conference on sustainable mobility. The game resulted from modding existing modern board games. We combined several game mechanisms and components with an urban map, following the Design, Play, Experience (DPE) framework for SG development. The low-tech game was available to Player Participants (PPs) and displayed in a way Non-Playing Participants (NPPs) could participate indirectly.
Results
The proposed SG engaged PPs and NPPs. PPs immediately started to plan the local transport system establishing a collaborative dynamic. NPPs participated by helping PPs, providing them with their expert and local knowledge. The simplicity of the game and the way it was displayed contributed to the engagement of PPs and NPPs.
Conclusion
Our findings show that layout configurations and facilitation techniques with analogue games can foster the participation of PPs and NPPs. Low-tech analogue SGs can be useful when resources are low, SG experience is reduced, and fast solutions for citizen and stakeholder engagement are necessary.
AbbottD.(December)Modding Tabletop Games for Education. In: International Conference on Games and Learning Alliance. Cham: Springer; 2018, pp. 318–329.
2.
AminA. Urban Planning in an uncertain world. In: FainsteinS. S.DeFilippisJ. (eds). Readings in planning theory. John Wiley & Sons; 2015.
3.
AmpatzidouC.Reinventing the Rules: Emergent Gameplay for Civic Learning. In: The Hackable City. Singapore: Springer; 2019, pp. 187–203.The Hackable City
4.
AmpatzidouC.GugerellK.Participatory game prototyping–balancing do-main content and playability in a serious game design for the energy transition. CoDesign2018: 1–16.
5.
AmpatzidouC.GugerellK.ConstantinescuT.DevischO.JauschnegM.BergerM.All Work and No Play? Facilitating Serious Games and Gamified Applications in Participatory Urban Planning and Governance. Urban Planning2018; 3(1): 34–46.
6.
AnsellC.GashA.Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory2008; 18(4): 543–571.
7.
BächtigerA.DryzekJ. S.MansbridgeJ.WarrenM. E. (eds). The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy. Oxford University Press; 2018.
8.
BerntzenL.JohannessenM. R.The role of citizen participation in municipal smart city projects: Lessons learned from, 2016, pp. 299–314.The Role of Citizen Participation in Municipal Smart City Projects: Lessons Learned from NorwayPublic Administration and Information Technology
9.
BoothP.Playing for Time. Rerolling Boardgames: Essays on Themes, Systems, Experiences and Ideologies. In: BrownD.MacCallum-StewartE. (eds). Rerolling Boardgames: Essays on Themes, Systems, Experiences and Ideologies. McFarland; 2020.
10.
BrabhamD. C.Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory2009; 8(3): 242–262.
11.
CallonM.LascoumesP.BartheY.Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. MIT press, 2009.
12.
CammaertsB.BruterM.BanajiS.HarrisonS.AnsteadN.The Myth of Youth Apathy. American Behavioral Scientist2014; 58(5): 645–664.
13.
CastronovaE.KnowlesI.Modding board games into serious games: The case of Climate Policy. International Journal of Serious Games2015; 2(3): 41–62.
CrookallD.Serious Games, Debriefing, and Simulation/Gaming as a Discipline. Simulation & Gaming2010; 41: 6898–920.
16.
DörnerR.GöbelS.EffelsbergW.WiemeyerJ.Serious Games. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
17.
DryzekJ. S.Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press on Demand, 2002.
18.
DziedzicD.WłodarczykW.Approaches to measuring the difficulty of games in dynamic difficulty adjustment systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction2018; 34(8): 707–715.
19.
EngelsteinG.ShalevI.Building Blocks of Tabletop Game Design: An Encyclopedia of Mechanisms. CRC Press, 2019.
20.
FarinosiM.FortunatiL.O'SullivanJ.PaganiL.Enhancing classical methodological tools to foster participatory dimensions in local urban planning. Cities2019; 88: 235–242.
21.
FarkasT.WisemanS.CairnsP.FiebrinkR.A Grounded Analysis of Player-Described Board Game Immersion. ACM CHI Play 2020, 2020.
22.
FungA.WrightE. O.Deeping Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. New York: Verso, 2003.
23.
GołębiowskiM.Spaghetti. Board Game. Granna, Group SNE, 2016.
24.
GordonE.Baldwin-PhilippiJ.Playful Civic Learning: Enabling Reflection and Lateral Trust in Game-based Public Participation. International Journal of Communication2014; 8: 759–786.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E.A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses. Planning Theory2015; 14(2): 195–213.
27.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E.Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. London and New York: Routledge, 2018.
28.
InnesJ. E.BooherD. E.Reframing public participation: strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice2004; 5(4): 419–436.
29.
JuraschekM.HerrmannC.ThiedeS.Utilizing gaming technology for simulation of urban production. Procedia CIRP2017; 61: 469–474.
30.
KoensK.KlijsJ.Weber-SabilJ.MelissenF.LalicicL.MayerI.ÖnderI.AallC.Serious gaming to stimulate participatory urban tourism planning. Journal of Sustainable Tourism2020: 1–20.
31.
LatourB.Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard university press, 1987.
32.
LedermanL. C.Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming1992; 23(2): 145–160.
33.
LeeK. M.JeongE. J.ParkN.RyuS.Effects of interactivity in educational games: A mediating role of social presence on learning outcomes. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction2011; 27(7): 620–633.
34.
MargerumR. D.Collaborative Planning. Journal of planning education and research2002; 21(3): 237–253.
35.
MayerI. S.The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: A review. Simulation & Gaming2009; 40(6): 825–862.
36.
MayerI.BekebredeG.HarteveldC.WarmelinkH.ZhouQ.van RuijvenT.LoJ.KortmannR.WenzlerI.The research and evaluation of serious games: Toward a comprehensive methodology. British Journal of Educational Technology2014; 45(3): 502–527.
37.
MooreK. R.ElliottT. J.From Participatory Design to a Listening Infrastructure. Journal of Business and Technical Communication2016; 30(1): 59–84.
38.
MuellerJ.LuH.ChirkinA.KleinB.SchmittG.Citizen Design Science: A strategy for crowd-creative urban design. Cities2018; 72: 181–188.
39.
OsmaniS. R.Participatory governance: An overview of the issues and evidence. In: Participatory Governance and the Millennium Development Goals. New York: United Nations; 2007, pp. 1–48.
40.
ParkerS.Urban theory and the urban experience: Encountering the city. Routledge, 2015.
41.
PortugaliJ.What makes cities complex?. In: Complexity, Cognition, Urban Planning and Design. Cham: Springer; 2016, pp. 3–19
42.
RogersonM. J.GibbsM.SmithW.I love all the bits: The materiality of boardgames. In: proceedings of the 2016 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM; 2016, pp. 3956–3969.
43.
SalenK.ZimmermanE.Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT press, 2004.
44.
SatoA.HaanJ. d.Applying an Experiential Learning Model to the Teaching of Gateway Strategy Board Games. International Journal of Instruction2016; 9(1): 3–16.
45.
SicartM.Play matters. MIT Press, 2014.
46.
SousaM.A Planning Game Over a Map: Playing Cards and Moving Bits to Collaboratively Plan a City. Frontiers in Computer Science2020a; 2: 37. DOI: 10.3389/fcomp.2020.00037.
47.
SousaM.Modern Serious Board Games: modding games to teach and train civil engineering students. 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2020b, pp. 197–201. DOI: 10.1109/EDUCON45650.2020.9125261.
48.
SousaM.BernardoE.Back in the Game: board games are modern. In: ZagaloN.VelosoA.CostaL.MealhaÓ. (eds). Videogame Sciences and Arts. VJ 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1164. Cham: Springer; 2019, 10.1007/978-3-030-37983-4_6.
49.
SpagnolliA.ChittaroL.GamberiniL.Interactive persuasive systems: a perspective on theory and evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction2016; 32(3): 177–189.
50.
TanE.The evolution of City GamingComplexity, Cognition, Urban Planning and Design. In: PortugaliJ.StolkE. (eds). Post-Proceedings of the 2nd Delft International Conference. Switzerland: Springer; 2016.
51.
ThielS.-K.ReisingerM.RödererK.FröhlichP.Playing (with) Democracy: A Review of Gamified Participation Approaches. JeDEM - eJournal of eDemocracy and Open Government2016; 8(3): 32–60.
52.
WangJ.-H.ChenS. Y.ChanT.-W.An investigation of a joyful peer response system: High ability vs. low ability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction2016; 32(6): 431–444.
53.
WhiteS. C.Depoliticising development: the uses and abuses of participation. Development in practice1996; 6(1): 6–15.
54.
WinnB. M.The design, play, and experience framework. In: Handbook of Research on Effective Electronic Gaming in Education. IGI Global; 2009. 1010–1024.
55.
XuY.BarbaE.RaduI.GandyM.MacIntyreB.Chores Are Fun: Un-derstanding Social Play in Board Games for Digital Tabletop Game Design. In: DiGRA Conference; 2011.
