Background. This study aims to examine the effectiveness of the “persuasion game” in changing environmental attitudes and behaviors in different cultural contexts. Personal communication has been identified as a key facilitator of environmental behaviors, but environmental communication in our daily lives is infrequent.
Intervention. This study tested the effects of the persuasion game in Germany, Hong Kong, and Japan. The game divides participants into two groups: persuaders and persuadees. The persuaders were given 10 minutes to persuade as many persuadees as they could to adopt energy-saving behaviors. Further, after 10 minutes, these participants were asked to switch their roles.
Method. The study employed a quasi-experimental pretest/posttest design to examine changes in attitudes and behavioral intentions of the participants toward energy-saving before and after their participation in the persuasion game. Participants were university students in Germany (N = 116), Hong Kong (N = 65), and Japan (N = 92).
Results. In all three countries, playing the game was associated with increased intention to adopt energy-saving behaviors, perceived seriousness of environmental problems, descriptive norm, and subjective norm. The increase in subjective norm was especially high in Japan, where the increase in intention to adopt energy-saving behavior was particularly pronounced among those who had less environmental communication.
Discussion. The results indicate that this game can not only facilitate communication on environmental issues in different cultural contexts but also change how people perceive others’ interest in environmental issues.
Conclusion. This study showed that persuasion game can be played in countries other than Japan as well. Moreover, it provides an opportunity to communicate with others on environmental issues, which may contribute to promoting future environmental behaviors.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
2.
AjzenI.FishbeinM. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
3.
AndoK.HiroseY. (1999). Determinants of turnover and willingness to exert efforts in environmental volunteer groups. The Japanese Society of Social Psychology, 15, 90-99. doi:10.14966/jssp.KJ00003724803
4.
AndoK.OhnumaS.BlöbaumA.MatthiesE.SugiuraJ. (2010). Determinants of individual and collective pro-environmental behaviors: Comparing Germany and Japan. Journal of Environmental Information Science, 38, 21-32. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/2115/44021
5.
AndoK.OhnumaS.ChangE. C. (2007). Comparing normative influences as determinants of environmentally conscious behaviors between the USA and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 171-178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00223.x
6.
AndoK.OhnumaS.HübnerG.SchultzW. (2015, February28). The effect of descriptive norms on university students’ pro-environmental behaviors: Cross cultural comparison. In 16th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology (p. 406), 28 February 2015, Long Beach, USA.
7.
ArcherD.PettigrewT. F.ConstanzoM.IritaniB.WalkerI.WhiteL. (1987). Energy conservation and public policy: The mediation of individual behavior. In KemptonW.NeimanM. (Eds.), Energy efficiency: Perspectives on individual behavior (pp. 69-92). Berkeley, CA: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy.
8.
BanduraA.WaltersR. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
BondM. H. (1993). Between the yin and the yang: The identity of the Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong: Chinese University Bulletin.
10.
BondM. H.CheungT. (1981). College students’ spontaneous self-concept: The effects of culture among respondents in Hong Kong, Japan, and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 14, 153-171. doi:10.1177/0022002183014002002
11.
BredmeierM. A.BernsteinG.OxmanW. (1982). BAFA BAFA and dogmatism / ethnocentrism: A study of attitude change through simulation gaming. Simulation & Gaming, 13, 413-436.
CialdiniR. B.RenoR. R.KallgrenC. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1015-1026.
14.
CostanzoM.ArcherD.AronsonE.PettigrewT. (1986). Energy conservation behavior: The difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist, 41, 521-528. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.5.521
15.
DietzT.KalofL.SternP. C. (2002). Gender, values, and environmentalism. Social Science Quarterly, 83, 353-364. doi:10.1111/1540-6237.00088
16.
EaglyA. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644-658. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.64.8.644
17.
ElmsA. C. (1966). Influence of fantasy ability on attitude change through role playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(1), 36-43. doi:10.1037/h0023509
18.
FeingoldA. (1994). Gender differences in personality: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429-456. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.116.3.429
19.
FishbeinM.AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
20.
FuH. Y. (1999). The social cognitive mediation of multiple enculturation and values (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hong Kong.
21.
FujiiS. (2003). Shakaiteki iirenma no shohousen: Toshi kotsu kankyoumondai no tameno shinrigaku [Social dilemma prescription: Psychology for urban, traffic, and environmental problem]. Kyoto, Japan: Nakanishiya (In Japanese).
22.
GeigerN.SwimJ. K. (2016). Climate of silence: Pluralistic ignorance as a barrier to climate change discussion. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 79-90. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.05.002
23.
HayashiS. (2009). Wa no bunka to sa no bunka saikou: Shin nihon jijoron [Culture of harmony and culture of distinction: An-other look on the new Japan]. Journal of Cross-Cultural Studies, 3, 88-104 (in Japanese).
24.
HongY. Y.MorrisM. W.ChiuC. Y.Benet-MartinezV. (2000). Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychological Association, 55, 709-720.
25.
HongY. Y.YeungG.ChiuC. Y.TongY. (1999). Social comparison during political transition: Interaction of entity versus incremental beliefs and social identities. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 257-279. doi:10.1016/S0147-1767(98)00038-8
26.
HorsleyA. D. (1977). The effects of a social learning experiment on attitudes and behavior toward environment conservation. Environment & Behavior, 9, 349-384. doi:10.1177/001391657700900304
27.
IPCC (2013). Summary for Policymakers. In StockerT. F.QinD.PlattnerG. K.TignorM.AllenS. K.BoschungJ.NauelsA.XiaY.BexV.MidgleyP. M. (Eds.), Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 3-29). Cambridge, UK and New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.
28.
KitayamaS.KarasawaM. (1995). Jiko: Bunkashinrigakutekishiza [The self: Cultural psychology perspective]. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 133-163 (in Japanese).
29.
KlöcknerC. A. (2015). The psychology of pro-environmental communication: Going beyond standard information strategies. London, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
30.
LawsonD. F.StevensonK. T.PetersonM. N.CarrierS. J.SeekampE.StrnadR. (2019). Evaluating climate change behaviors and concern in the family context. Environmental Education Research, 25, 678-690. doi:10.1080/13504622.2018.1564248
31.
LeiserowitzA.MaibachE.Roser-RenoufC.FeinbergG.RosenthalS. (2015). Climate change in the American mind: October, 2015. New Haven, CT: Yale Program on Climate Change Communication, Yale University and George Mason University.
32.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224-253. doi:10.4135/9781446262054
33.
MeeusenC. (2014). The intergenerational transmission of environmental concern: The influence of parents and communication patterns within the family. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45, 77-90. doi:10.1080/00958964.2013.8462 90
34.
MotosuE.SugiuraJ.KatoT.KogaH.ArakawaC. (2009). Social acceptance of small wind turbines in urban area: Examination using persuasion game. Japanese Journal of Simulation & Gaming, 19, 135-144.
35.
NakanoM. (2011). Giron nouryoku no jyukutatsuka purosesu ni motoduita shidoho no teian [Suggestions for teaching method based on a process model of acquiring argumentative skills]. Kyoto, Japan: Nakanishiya (in Japanese).
36.
NgS. H.LaiJ. C. L. (2011). Bicultural self, multiple social identities, and dual patriotisms among ethnic Chinese in Hong Kong. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42, 89-103. doi:10.1177/0022022110361715
37.
NgT. K.NgS. H.YeS. (2016). Assimilation and contrast effects of culture priming among Hong Kong Chinese: The moderating roles of dual cultural selves. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 47, 540-557. doi:10.1177/0022022116631826
38.
NishigakiE. (2008). Effects of the health education program with gaming simulation for college students. International Journal of Psychology, 43, 154.
39.
NonamiH.SugiuraJ.OhnumaS.YamakawaH.HiroseY. (1997). The roles of various media in the decision making processes for recycling behavior: A path analysis model. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 68, 264-271 (in Japanese). doi:10.4992/jjpsy.68.264
40.
OskampS.HarringtonM. J.EdwardsT. C.SherwoodD.OkudaS. M.SwansonD. C. (1991). Factors influencing household recycling behavior. Environment and Behavior, 23, 494-519.
41.
OysermanD.CoonH.KemmelmeierM. (2002). Rethinking individualism and collectivism: Evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 128(1), 3-72.
42.
StaatsH. J.WitA. P.MiddenC. Y. H. (1996). Communicating the greenhouse effect to the public: Evaluation of a mass media campaign from a social dilemma perspective. Journal of Environmental Management, 45, 189-203. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0015
43.
StevensonK. T.PetersonM. N.BondellH. D. (2016). The influence of personal beliefs, friends, and family in building climate change concern among adolescents. Environmental Education Research, 25, 832-845. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1177712
44.
SugiuraJ. (2003). Persuasion game as an educational tool for environmental issues: Examinations of development, application and improvement processes. Simulation & Gaming, 13, 3-13 (in Japanese).
45.
SugiuraJ. (2007). Developing study materials for confidence tricks using persuasion game. Japanese Journal of Consumer Education, 27, 113-122 (in Japanese).
46.
SugiuraJ. (2008). Effect of “participatory communication game” on environmental education. In XXIX International Congress of Psychology, 21 July, Berlin, Germany.
47.
SugiuraJ.Mondaibunsekitu-ru to siteno ‘Settoku-Nattoku game’ no kaihatuto sono shakaitekijuyou [Development of ‘Settoku-Naggoku game (persuasion game)’ as a tool to analyze problems and its social acceptance] (Research report for Foundation for the Fusion of Science and Technology), 1-348 (in Japanese).
48.
SugiuraJ.MotosuM. (2013). Effects of role playing on persuasion: Comparison between German and Japan. The Japanese Journal of Persuasion and Negotiation, 5, 15-28 (in Japanese).
49.
TakanoY.OsakaE. (1997). “Nihon-jin no shuudanshugi” to“amerika-jin no kojinshugi”: Tsuusetsu no saikentou [“Japanese collectivism” and “American individualism”: Reexamining the dominant view]. Japanese Journal of Psychology, 68, 312-327 (in Japanese). doi:10.4992/jjpsy.68.312
50.
TakanoY.OsakaE. (1999). An unsupported common view: Comparing Japan and the U.S. on individualism/collectivism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2, 311-341. doi:10.1111/1467-839X.00043
51.
TakanoY.OsakaE. (2018). Comparing Japan and the United States on individualism/collectivism: A follow-up review. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 21, 301-316. doi:10.1111/ajsp.12322
52.
TamK. -P.ChanH. -W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182-194. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001
53.
ToblerC.VisschersV. H.SiegristM. (2012). Addressing climate change: Determinants of consumers’ willingness to act and to support policy measures. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32, 197-207.
54.
TriandisH. C.LeungK.HuiC. H. (1990). A method for determining cultural, demographic, and personal constructs. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 21, 302-318. doi:10.1177/0022022190213003
55.
TsuneyoshiR. (1992). Ningen keisei no nichibei hikaku [Comparing human building in Japan and the U.S.]. Tokyo, Japan: Chouou Kouron Shinsha (in Japanese).
56.
ValdezR. X.PetersonM. N.StevensonK. T. (2018). How communication with teachers, family and friends contributes to predicting climate change behaviour among adolescents. Environmental Conversation, 45, 183-191. doi:10.1017/S0376892917000443
57.
WilliamsR. H.WilliamsA. J. (2007). In pursuit of peace: Attitudinal and behavioral change with simulations and multiple identification theory. Simulation & Gaming, 38, 453-471.
