Background. The latest Japanese National Curriculum emphasized the importance of active learning as well as communication skills in various subject areas. Following this trend, the social skills education (SSE) approach was adopted to promote and improve skills that facilitate interpersonal conflict resolution in elementary school students.
Aim. This study developed a card game to help elementary school teachers perform SSE. The aims were to convince students to contemplate alternative solutions to problems in a way that incorporates suggestions from other students and to motivate children to think about problem solving in a social context.
Methods. Our card game was developed based on Matsuda’s warp and woof model of problem-solving that emphasizes generating ideas concerning trade-off resolution in problem-solving. We then tested the game in a sample of 74 fourth grade (9-10 years old) elementary school students.
Results. The findings suggest that the students understood the importance of considering new alternatives for trade-off resolution by playing our game.
Conclusions. Despite the limitations of our study, such as the small sample size, our findings demonstrated that the game was successful in teaching most students the necessity of reaching a consensus in situations involving conflicting opinions.
AngR. P.TanJ. L.GohD. H.HuanV. S.OoiY. P.BoonJ. S. T.FungD. S. S. (2017). A game-based approach to teaching social problem-solving skills. In ZengR.GardnerM. K. (Eds.), Handbook of research on serious games for educational applications (pp. 168-195). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0513-6.ch008
2.
BruerJ. T. (1993). Schools for thought: A science of learning in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DeweyJ. (1910). The analysis of a complete act of thought. In DeweyJ. (Ed.), How we think (pp. 68-78). Lexington, MA: D. C. Heath. doi:10.1037/10903-006
5.
DodgeK. A. (1986). A social information processing model of social competence in children. In PerlmutterM. (Ed.), Cognitive perspectives on children’s social and behavioral development: The Minnesota symposium on child psychology (Vol. 18, pp. 77-125). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781315802343
6.
D’ZurillaT. J. (1986). Problem-solving therapy: A social competence approach to clinical intervention. New York, NY: Springer.
7.
D’ZurillaT. J.GoldfriedM. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78(1), 107-126. doi:10.1037/h0031360
8.
HiroseY.SugiuraJ.ShimomotoK. (2004). Industrial waste management simulation game and its educational effect. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 6(1), 58-63. doi:10.1007/s10163-003-0108-4
9.
JonassenD. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85. doi:10.1007/BF02300500
10.
KohlbergL. (1973). The claim to moral adequacy of a highest stage of moral judgment. The Journal of Philosophy, 70(18), 630-646. doi:10.2307/2025030
11.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
12.
MatsudaT. (2015). Design framework of gaming materials to cultivate problem-solving abilities: Differences and commonalities among STEM educations. In Proceedings of the 13th Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 2147-2159). Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from http://hiceducation.org/conference-proceedings/
13.
MatsudaT. (2017). Development of an e-portfolio system for educational technology research based on the warp and woof model of problem solving. In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 2903-2911). Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from http://hiceducation.org/conference-proceedings/
14.
MatsudaT.IdeM. (2019). Designing a built-in module to teach study skills in E-learning materials. In Proceedings of the 17th Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 1046-1053). Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from http://hiceducation.org/conference-proceedings/
15.
NezuA. M.NezuC. M.PerriM. G. (1989). Problem-solving therapy for depression: Theory, research, and clinical guidelines. Oxford, UK: John Wiley.
16.
OkadaY. (2017). Gaming instructional materials for social skills education for university students. In DronJ.MishraS. (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 424-429). San Diego, CA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved from http://www.learntechlib.org/p/181213/
17.
OkadaY.MatsudaT. (2016). Possibility to use gaming method for instruction and assessment in social skills education. In Proceedings of the 32th Japan Society for Educational Technology, Osaka, Japan (pp. 103-106). Retrieved from https://www.jset.gr.jp/taikai32/program/program_sg.php
18.
OkadaY.TakanoK.TsukaharaN. (2014). Development of the psycho-educational program for junior high school students to deepen the self-awareness of emotions. In Proceedings of the 12th Hawaii International Conference on Education (pp. 2213-2222). Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from http://hiceducation.org/conference-proceedings/
19.
RubinK. H.KrasnorL. R. (1986). Social-cognitive and social behavioral perspectives on problem solving. In PerlmutterM. (Ed.), The Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology: Cognitive perspectives on children’s social and behavioral development (Vol. 18, pp. 1-68). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. doi:10.4324/9781315802343
20.
RubinK. H.KrasnorL. R. (1992). Interpersonal problem solving and social competence in children. In Van HasseltV. B.HersenM. (Eds.), Handbook of social development (pp. 283-323). New York, NY: Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0694-6_12
21.
SannomiyaM. (1996). Meta-cognition and attention in thinking. In IchikawaS. (Ed.), Thinking (pp. 157-180). Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo Press.
22.
SatoS.SatoY.OkayasuT.TakayamaI. (2000). Social skills training with children: A review. In Memoirs of the Faculty of Education and Culture, Miyazaki University. Education Science (Vol. 3, pp. 81-105).
23.
ThiagarajanS. (2006). BARNGA: A simulation game on cultural clashes. Boston, MA: Intercultural Press.
24.
WatanabeR. (1993). The development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in children: The relationship between social information processing and interpersonal negotiation strategies. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 41(4), 452-461. Retrieved from http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/10624891
25.
WatanabeR. (1995). A study on children’s interpersonal negotiation strategy in a hypothetical interpersonal conflict situation: Effects of age, sex, interaction with another and popularity. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 43(3), 248-255. Retrieved from http://dl.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/10625016
26.
YeatesK. O.SchultzL. H.SelmanR. L. (1991). The development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in thought and action: A social-cognitive link to behavioral adjustment and social status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 37(3), 369-405. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23087396
27.
YeatesK. O.SelmanR. L. (1989). Social competence in the schools: Toward an integrative developmental model for intervention. Developmental Review, 9(1), 64-100. doi:10.1016/0273-2297(89)90024-5
