Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background. Serious games have the potential to provide benefits that beyonds entertainment value. Recent growth in the empirical research of serious games shows their abilities to deliver prosocial messages.

Aim. This study aims to examine the use of games in the management of cultural schemas as well as moderating intercultural sensitivity and intercultural communication competence. Moreover, this study explores how and why simulation games, such as BAFÁ BAFÁ, function as persuasive technologies (PTs) effectively motivating individuals into behavior change.

Method. An experimental study with three conditions (game, reading, and control) was conducted to examine the effects of BAFÁ BAFÁ on enhancing participants’ intercultural sensitivity as well as communication competence compared to reading intercultural materials or regular activity.

Results. Both intercultural sensitivity and communication competence were measured with multi-dimensional scales, and the results of the multi-variate analyses indicated that the intercultural simulation game BAFÁ BAFÁ can facilitate the increase of participants’ intercultural sensitivity and communication competence.

Keywords

applied communication cultural competence games persuasive technology

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Berkovsky

(2006, June). Decentralized mediation of user models for a better personalization. In International conference on adaptive hypermedia and adaptive web-based systems (pp. 404-408). Berlin, Germany: Springer.

Bruschke

J. C.

Gartner

Seiter

J. S.

(1993). Student ethnocentrism, dogmatism, and motivation: A study of BAFÁ BAFÁ. Simulation & Gaming, 24(1), 9-20.

Chris

Hudson

(2011). Pediluma: Motivating physical activity through contextual information and social influence. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (pp. 173-180). New York, NY: ACM.

Coutu

(1951). Role-playing vs. role-taking: An appeal for clarification. American Sociological Review, 16, 180-187.

Cronbach

L. J.

(1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Crookall

Saunders

(1989). Towards an integration of communication and simulation. In Crookall

Staunders

(Eds.), Communication and simulation: From two fields to one theme (pp. 3-29). Philadelphia, PA: Multilingual Matter.

de Jong

Warmelink

. (2017). Oasistan: An intercultural role-playing simulation game to recognize cultural dimensions. Simulation & Gaming, 48(2), 178-198.

Fialho, A. T., van den Heuvel, H., Shahab, Q., Liu, Q., Li, L., Saini, P., . . . & Markopoulos, P. (2009) . ActiveShare: Sharing challenges to increase physical activities. In Proceedings of the 27th international conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI2009). Boston, MA.

Fogg

B. J.

(1999). Persuasive technologies. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 27-29.

10.

Fogg

B. J.

(2003). Persuasive technology. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

11.

Fritz

Mollenberg

(2002). Measuring intercultural sensitivity in different cultural contexts. Intercultural Communication Studies, XI, 165-177.

12.

Gannon

M. J.

Poon

J. M. L.

(1997). Effects of alternative instructional approaches on cross-cultural training outcomes. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 21(4), 429-446.

13.

Garro

(2000). Remembering what one knows and the construction of the past: A comparison of cultural consensus theory and cultural schema theory. Ethos, 28(3), 275-319.

14.

Hammer

Bennet

Wiseman

(2003). Measuring intercultural sensitivity: The intercultural development inventory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, 421-443.

15.

Hofstede

G. J.

De Caluwé

Peters

(2010). Why simulation games work-in search of the active substance: A synthesis. Simulation & Gaming, 41(6), 824-843.

16.

Hofstede

G. J.

Pedersen

(1999). Synthetic cultures: Intercultural learning through simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 30(4), 415-440.

17.

Inglis

Sammon

Justice

Cuneo

Miller

Rice

. . . Warry

(2004). Cross-cultural simulation to advance student inquiry. Simulation & Gaming, 35(4), 476-487.

18.

Jarus

(2017). The Maya: History, culture & religion. Retrieved from http://www.livescience.com/41781-the-maya.html

19.

Khalil

Abdallah

(2013). Harnessing social dynamics through persuasive technology promote healthier lifestyle. Retrieved from https://dspace.adu.ac.ae/handle/1/642

20.

Männamaa

Leijen

. (2015). The simulated acculturation model in the FOUNTAINS-game. Simulation & Gaming, 46(1), 98-112.

21.

Mead

G. H.

(1934). Mind, self, and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Mitgutsch

Alvarado

(2012, May). Purposeful by design? A serious game design assessment framework. In Proceedings of the international conference on the foundations of digital games (pp. 121-128).

23.

Peng

Lee

Heeter

(2010). The effects of a serious game on role-taking and willingness to help. Journal of Communication, 60(4), 723-742.

24.

Pruegger

V. J.

Rogers

T. B.

(1994). Cross-cultural sensitivity training: Methods and assessment. International Journal of Intercultural Relation, 18(3), 369-387.

25.

Santos

J. R. A.

(1999). Cronbach’s alpha: A tool for assessing the reliability of scales. Journal of Extension, 37(2), 1-5.

26.

Scheff

(1967). Toward a sociological theory of consensus. American Sociological Review, 32, 32-46.

27.

Shirts

R. G.

(1970). BAFÁ BAFÁ: A cross culture simulation. San Diego, CA: U.S. Navy Personnel Research Development Centre.

28.

Shirts

R. G.

(1977). BAFÁ BAFÁ. Del Mar, CA: Simile 2.

29.

Shirts

R. G.

(2009). History of BAFÁ BAFÁ - A cross cultural, diversity, inclusion simulation. Retrieved from http://www.simulationtrainingsystems.com/history-bafa-bafa/

30.

Simulation Training Systems. (2006). BAFÁ BAFÁ. Retrieved from http://stsintl.com/schools-charities/bafa.html

31.

Singhal

Cody

M. J.

Rogers

E. M.

Sabido

(2004). Entertainment education and social change: History, research, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge.

32.

Spitzberg

B. H.

Cupach

W. R.

(1984). Interpersonal communication competence (Vol. 4). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.

33.

Stokes

Seggerman

Rejeski

(2006). For a better world: Digital games and the social change sector. Washington, D. C.: Games for Change and the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.

34.

Suransky

(1973). International relations games and simulations: An evaluation. In Horn

R. E.

Cleaves

(Eds.), The guide to simulations/games for education and training (4th ed., pp. 162-176). Cranford, NJ: Didactic Systems.

35.

Swain

(2007). Designing games to effect social change. In Proceedings of the digital games research association (pp. 805-809).

36.

Tukey

J. W.

(1949). Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics, 5(2), 99-114.

37.

Visch

V. T.

Vegt

N. J. H.

Anderiesen

Van der Kooij

(2013). Persuasive game design: A model and its definitions. Retrieved from http://gamification-research.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Visch_etal.pdf

38.

Wendorf Muhamad

. (2016). Beyond passive entertainment: Evaluating the role of active entertainment-education in the prevention of commercial sexual exploitation of children (Doctoral dissertation). University of Miami.

39.

Wendorf Muhamad

(forthcoming). Reclaiming narratives: Self-care and social justice through experiential interactions. In Afray Fritz (Eds). More than Words: Expressive Therapeutic Narrative Praxis in Educational and Clinical Settings. Lexington Books.

40.

Wenzler

Chartier

(1999). Why do we bother with games and simulations: An organizational learning perspective. Simulation & Gaming, 30(3), 375-384.

Cross-Cultural Learning in Gameplay: BAFÁ BAFÁ,Persuasive Technology,and the Exploration of Intercultural Sensitivity

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References