Background. A significant gap exists in the United States between ambitious regulatory goals requiring firms to introduce hybrid and electric vehicles, and consumer adoption of these technologies to date. However, the interventions required to close this gap are not obvious due to the complex feedbacks and time delays that govern alternative fuel vehicle (AFV) diffusion.
Purpose. The purpose of this article is to introduce Driving the Future (DtF), a free, web-based management flight simulator to explore the effects of automaker strategies and public policies on the US automotive market.
Method. We develop a behavioral, dynamic model portraying multiple automobile and fuel types, fueling infrastructure, and consumer choices, enabling users to rapidly experiment with how a wide array of decisions and assumptions shape the dynamics of AFV diffusion out to 2050.
Results. We describe how the simulator can be used to explore various scenarios for AFV adoption, and discuss how the simulator can help improve mental models and decision-making. We present evidence from classroom and online experiments, demonstrating that the simulation is both effective in developing users’ understanding of AFV diffusion dynamics, and enjoyable to use.
ANL. (2015). “Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation” (GREET) Model. The Argonne National Laboratory. Retrieved from https://greet.es.anl.gov/
2.
ArrowK. J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155-173.
3.
ArgoteL.EppleD. (1990). Learning curves in manufacturing. Science, 247(4945), 920-924.
4.
BerinskyA. J.HuberG. A.LenzG. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351-368.
BrownstoneD.BunchD.TrainK. (2000). Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part B, 34, 315-338.
7.
CaiazzoF.AshokA.WaitzI. A.YimS. H. L.BarrettS. R. H. (2013). Air pollution and early deaths in the United States. Part I: Quantifying the impact of major sectors in 2003. Atmospheric Environment, 79, 198-208.
DiamondD. (2009). The impact of government incentives for hybrid-electric vehicles: Evidence from US States. Energy Policy, 37, 972-983. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.094
EIA. (2016a). Monthly energy review - September 2016, energy information administration. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy. Retrieved from https://www.eia.gov/totalenergy/data/monthly/
ForresterJ. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
ForresterJ. W. (1969). Urban dynamics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17.
GallagherK. S.MuehleggerE. (2011). Giving green to get green: Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61, 1-15.
18.
GreenspanA.CohenD. (1999). Motor vehicle stocks, scrappage, and sales. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 369-383. doi:10.1162/003465399558300
19.
GREET. (2016). The Greenhouse Gases, Regulated Emissions, and Energy Use in Transportation Model. Argonne National Laboratory. Retrieved from https://greet.es.anl.gov/
PeerE.VosgerauJ.AcquistiA. (2014). Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Behavioral Research Methods, 46(4), 1023-1031.
31.
RichardsonG. (1991). Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
32.
SperlingD.GordonD. (2009). Two billion cars: Driving towards sustainability. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33.
StermanJ. D. (1994). Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review, 10(2-3), 291-330. doi:10.1002/sdr.4260100214
34.
StermanJ. D. (2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601336
35.
StermanJ. D. (2014a). Interactive web-based simulations for strategy and sustainability: The MIT Sloan LearningEdge management flight simulators, Part I. System Dynamics Review, 30(1-2), 89-121. doi:10.1002/sdr.1513
StrubenJ. J. R.StermanJ. (2008). Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B, 35, 1070-1097.
38.
TiwariS. (2016). Improved understanding of alternative fuel vehicle market dynamics using interactive simulations (Unpublished masters thesis). Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
39.
TrainK. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. Cambridge university press.
UMTRI. (2016). Sales-weighted fuel-economy rating (window sticker) of purchase new vehicles for October 2007 through December 2016. University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/~umtriswt/EDI_sales-weighted-mpg.html
