Background. The use of game-based learning strategies in higher education has shown promise to increase student motivation and achievement. Little is known about which game mechanics are most appropriate and effective for learners at different academic levels.
Aim. This article examines teacher selection and implementation of game mechanics in 27 courses from middle school to higher education designed with game-based learning.
Method. 27 educators participated in an open-ended survey on the design of their course. Measures included an open response survey on patterns and design of game mechanics with results validated through member checking.
Results. Findings included different choices of game attritubes and game elements in courses in middle school, high school, and higher education. Teacher selection and inclusion of game mechanics changed over time to better meet the needs of students.
Conclusions. The structure of game-based learning at different levels will vary to meet the developmental and academic needs of students, but more work is needed in determining which strategies are most effective for learning.
AlaswadZ.NadolnyL. (2015). Designing for game-based learning: The effective integration of technology to support learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(4), 389-402.
2.
BedwellW. L.PavlasD.HeyneK.LazzaraE. H.SalasE. (2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning an empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43(6), 729-760.
3.
BlakesleyC. (2013). The role of narrative in the design of an educational game. In WilliamsC. C.OchsnerA.DietmeierJ.SteinkuehlerC. (Eds.), Proceedings GLS 9.0: Games + Learning + Society Conference (pp. 46-52). Madison, WI: Games + Learning + Society.
4.
CohenL.ManionL.MorrisonK. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
CreswellJ. W.MillerD. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.
6.
DarvasiP. (2014). The Ward Game: A pervasive novel study. In OchsnerA.DietmeierJ.WilliamsC. C.SteinkuehlerC. (Eds.), Proceedings GLS 10.0: Games + Learning + Society Conference (pp. 334-336). Madison, WI: Games + Learning + Society.
7.
DeterdingS.DixonD.KhaledR.NackeL. (2011, September). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9-15). Tampere, Finland: ACM.
8.
DeterdingS.SicartM.NackeL.O’HaraK.DixonD. (2011, May). Gamification: Using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In Workshop presented at CHI 2011, Vancouver, Canada.
9.
DickW.CareyL.CareyJ. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Pearson.
10.
DickW.CareyL.CareyJ. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
11.
EcclesJ. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In LernerR. M.SteinbergL. (Eds.). Handbook of adolescent psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 125-153). John Wiley and Sons.
12.
FallonJ. (2014). Finding the journal of Odysseus: Making and using pervasive games in the classroom. In OchsnerA.DietmeierJ.WilliamsC. C.SteinkuehlerC. (Eds.), Proceedings GLS 10.0: Games + Learning + Society Conference (pp. 96-101). Madison, WI: Games + Learning + Society.
HanghøjT.BrundC. E. (2011). Teachers and serious games: Teacher roles and positioning in relation to educational games. In Egenfelt-Nielsen, S., Meyer, B., & Sørensen, B.H. (Eds.), Serious games in education (pp. 125-136). Aarhus, Denmark: Aarhus University Press.
17.
HarteveldC. (2011). Triadic game design: Balancing reality, meaning and play. London, England: Springer.
18.
HullD. C.WilliamsG. A.GriffithsM. D. (2013). Video game characteristics, happiness and flow as predictors of addiction among video game players: A pilot study. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(3), 145-152.
19.
JabbarA. I. A.FeliciaP. (2015). Gameplay engagement and learning in game-based learning: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 85(4), 740-779.
20.
KellerJ. M. (1987). IMMS: Instructional Materials Motivation Survey. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University.
21.
KellerJ. M. (2008). An integrative theory of motivation, volition, and performance. Technology, Instruction, Cognition, and Learning, 6(2), 79-104.
22.
LegaultL.Green-DemersI.PelletierL. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward an understanding of academic amotivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 567-582.
23.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
24.
NadolnyL. (2016). EPIC WIN: Designing for success with game-based learning. In ChambleeG.LangubL. (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 33-36). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
25.
PalinkasL. A.HorwitzS. M.GreenC. A.WisdomJ. P.DuanN.HoagwoodK. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.
26.
PlassJ. L.HomerB. D.KinzerC. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258-283.
27.
QianM.ClarkK. R. (2016). Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 50-58.
28.
RichardsonM.AbrahamC.BondR. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ academic performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 138(2), 353-387.
29.
RobsonK.PlanggerK.KietzmannJ. H.McCarthyI.PittL. (2016). Game on: Engaging customers and employees through gamification. Business Horizons, 59(1), 29-36.
30.
SalenK.ZimmermanE. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31.
SheldonL. (2011). The multiplayer classroom: Designing coursework as a game. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
32.
SicartM. (2008). Defining game mechanics. Game Studies, 8(2), 1-14.
33.
SmithG.AndersonR.KopleckB.LindbladZ.ScottL.WardellA.MateasM. (2011). Situating quests: Design patterns for quest and level design in role-playing games. In SiM.ThueD.AndréE.LesterJ.C.TanenbaumJ.ZammittoV. (Eds.), Interactive storytelling (pp. 326-329). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
34.
Van StaalduinenJ. P.de FreitasS. (2011). A game-based learning framework: Linking game design and learning. In KhineM. (Ed.), Learning to play: Exploring the future of education with video games (pp. 29-54). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
35.
WilsonK. A.BedwellW. L.LazzaraE. H.SalasE.BurkeC. S.EstockJ. L.ConkeyC. (2009). Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes review and research proposals. Simulation & Gaming, 40(2), 217-266.
36.
ZichermannG.CunninghamC. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, Inc.
37.
ZimmermanE. (2003). Play as research: The iterative design process. In LaurelB. (Ed.), Design research: Methods and perspectives (pp. 176-184). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
