Background: Sustainable management of the municipal water supply is a priority issue in the policy agenda of Maui County, Hawaii. The Maui Economic Development Board launched the WaterStory initiative to educate residents about the determinants and history of Maui’s water resource development. A System Dynamics model was developed and coupled with a user interface to create WATERSTORY, an interactive learning environment (ILE).
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the benefits of WATERSTORY for the identification and assessment of sustainable water management policies in Maui.
Method: WATERSTORY is a System Dynamics-based ILE that shows the cross-sectoral impacts of users’ decisions. Both, the simulation model and the ILE resulted from group modeling and ILE testing sessions.
Results: The development of the WATERSTORY ILE facilitated the involvement of local communities in the discussion of water management problems and identification of possible solutions.
Conclusions: The study suggests that developing a simple ILE is essential in raising the interest of a wide audience involved in sustainable development policy making. After stakeholders gain confidence in the benefit of the ILE, it becomes easier to integrate simulation exercises into planning processes at national, regional and local levels.
AlessiS. (2000). Designing educational support in system-dynamics-based interactive learning environments. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 31, 178-196.
2.
AndersenD. F.RichardsonG. P. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review, 13, 187-201.
3.
BarlasY. (2002). System dynamics: Systemic feedback modeling for policy analysis. In UNESCO-EOLSS (Ed.), Knowledge for sustainable development: An Insight into the Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (pp. 1131-1175). Oxford, UK: EOLSS Publishers/UNESCO.
4.
BassiA. M.MistryR. S. (2009). An integrated assessment of water management options on Maui. Environmental Science & Engineering Magazine, Fall Issue2009, 62-65.
5.
BassiA. M.HarrisonJ.MistryR. S. (2009). Using an integrated participatory modeling approach to assess water management options and support community conversations on Maui. Sustainability, 1, 1331-1348.
6.
BassiA.SchoenbergW.PowersR. (2010). An integrated approach to energy prospects for North America and the rest of the world. Energy Economics, 32, 30-42.
7.
Commission on Water Resource Management. (2008). Water Resource Protection Plan (WRPP), Hawaii Water Plan. Honolulu: State of Hawaii.
8.
DavidsenP. I. (2000). Issues in the design and use of system-dynamics-based interactive learning environments. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 31, 170-177.
9.
DreyerM.RennO. (2011). Participatory approaches to modeling for improved learning and decision-making in natural resource governance: An editorial. Environmental Policy and Governance, 21, 379-385.
10.
FiddamanT. (2002). Exploring policy options with a behavioral climate–economy model. System Dynamics Review, 18, 243-267.
11.
FletcherC. (2010). Hawai’i’s changing climate: Briefing sheet 2010. Manoa: Center for Island Climate Adaptation and Policy, School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology, University of Hawai’i.
12.
FredericksK. (2008). Using system dynamics as an evaluation tool: Experience from a demonstration program. American Journal of Evaluation, 29, 251-267.
13.
FreedmanC. (2007). Maui County Water Use and Development (WUDP). Maui, HI: Water Use and Demand Department of Water Supply Systems.
14.
HM Government. (2010). 2050 PATHWAYS ANALYSIS. Department of Energy and Climate Change. www.decc.gov.uk.
15.
HomerJ.HirschG.MinnitiM.PiersonM. (2004). Models for collaboration: How system dynamics helped a community organize cost-effective care for chronic illness. System Dynamics Review, 20, 199-222.
16.
HomerJ.Ritchie-DunhamJ.RabbinoH.PuenteL.JorgensenJ.HendricksK. (2000). Toward a dynamic theory of antibiotic resistance. System Dynamics Review, 16, 287-319.
17.
LearmonthG. P.SmithD. E.ShermanW. H.WhiteM. A.PlankJ. (2011). A practical approach to the complex problem of environmental sustainability: The UVa Bay Game. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 16(1), Article 4. Retrieved from http://www.innovation.cc/scholarly-style/learmonth_sustain_inviroment_v16i1a4.pdf.
18.
Maui County Office of Economic Development. (2011). Maui County data book 2011. Wailuku, HI: Office of Economic Development and Hawai‘i Small Business Development Center Network, Hawai‘i Business Research Library.
19.
MisuracaG.KoussourisS.LampathakiF.KokkinakosP.CharalabidisY.AskounisD. (2013). Case studies on specific applications of ICT solutions for policy modeling. Athens, Greece: CROSSOVER Project, National Technical University of Athens (NTUA).
20.
OkiD. (2004). Trends in streamflow characteristics at long-term gauging stations, Hawaii. Maui, HI: Geological Survey Scientific Investigations.
21.
OPINION SPACE 3.0. FaridaniS.BittonE.RyokaiK.GoldberK. (2010). Opinion Space: A scalable tool for browsing online comments. In Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Computer Human Interaction (CHI) (pp. 1175-1184). Atlanta, GA: ACM.
22.
RichardsonG. (1991). System dynamics: Simulation for policy analysis from a feedback perspective. In FishwickP.LukerP. (Eds.), Qualitative simulation modeling and analysis (pp. 144-169). New York, NY: Springer.
23.
RitzemaH.HarmsenJ.WoltersW.BoonstraJ.FroebrichJ. (2011). Knowledge compendium: Dialogue on bridging water, food security and sustainable agribusiness development in Africa. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Alterra.
24.
RouwetteE. A.VennixJ. A.ThijssenC. M. (2000). Group model building: A decision room approach. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 31, 359-379.
25.
Socio-Economic Forescast. (2006). The economic projections for the Maui County General Plan 2030. Maui, HI: Maui County Planning Department.
26.
SubrotoA. (2012). Understanding complexities in public policy making process through policy cycle model: A system dynamics approach. In Proceedings of the 30th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society. St. Gallen, Switzerland.
27.
TrappeyC.TrappeyA.LinG.ChangY. (2011). System dynamics evaluation of renewable energy policies. In FreyD.FukudaS.RockG. (Eds.), Improving complex systems today (pp. 133-140). London, England: Springer.
28.
UNEP. (2011). Modeling global green investment scenarios: Supporting the transition to a global green economy. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
29.
UVA BAY GAME. LearmonthG. P.SmithD. E.ShermanW. H.WhiteM. A.PlankJ. (2011). A practical approach to the complex problem of environmental sustainability: The UVa Bay Game. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 16(1).
30.
ValkeringP.TàbaraJ. D.WallmanP.OffermansA. (2009). Modeling cultural and behavioral change in water management: An integrated, agent based, gaming approach. Integrated Assessment – Bridging Science & Policy, 9(1), 19-46.
31.
ValkeringP.van der BruggeR.OffermansA.HaasnootM.VreugdenhilH. (2013). A perspective-based simulation game to explore future pathways of a water-society system under climate change. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 44, 366-390.
32.
WaddellP.LimingW.XuanL. (2008). UrbanSim: An evolving planning support system for evolving communities. In BrailR. (Ed.), Planning support systems for cities and regions (pp. 103-138). Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
