Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A Hypercontextualized Game (HCG) is a locally designed game that supports its players in gathering context-specific information and in-depth understanding and knowledge regarding the context of a site. LIEKSAMYST, an exciting mobile application, with which visitors can play various games based on stories, was originally developed for the open-air section of the Pielinen Museum and is an example of such a hypercontextualized game. Each individual game (which together make up LIEKSAMYST) was developed in, for and with the co-operation of the Pielinen Museum. In its design, LIEKSAMYST purposefully attempts to connect users to the local history and thus promote affective engagement. With the co-operation of both a local school (Lieksan Keskuskoulu) and the museum authorities, we set out to discover how LIEKSAMYST guides the informal learning experience of Grade 7 pupils. We gathered information from 101 pupils on-site (through questionnaires) and used this data, as well as the pupils’ academic grades, to elucidate our study by investigating the relationship between engagement and motivation. The data were analyzed using a quantitative method guided by a qualitative interpretational approach and we found a significant correlation between (a) fantasy and (b) affective and cognitive engagement. The study highlighted the importance of evoking and harnessing both affective and cognitive engagement, through the fundamental element of fantasy, in the game narrative.

Keywords

affective engagement cognitive engagement contextual game engagement fantasy game game-based learning hypercontextualized games informal learning experience locally designed game motivation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alessi

S. M.

Trollip

S. R.

(2001). Multimedia for learning: Methods and development (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Bedwell

W. L.

Pavlas

Heyne

Lazzara

E. H.

Salas

(2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning an empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43, 729-760.

Blunch

(2008). Introduction to structural equation modelling using SPSS and Amos. London, England: SAGE.

Caillois

(1958). Man, play and games (Reprint ed., Barash

Trans.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Crookall

(2010). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simulation & Gaming, 41, 898-920.

Csikszentmihalyi

(2008). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience (1st ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Deci

E. L.

Ryan

R. M.

(1985). Intrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.

Engeström

(1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki, Finland: Orienta-Konsultit Oy.

Florescano

(2006). El juguete mexicano [The Mexican toy]. Michoacan, Mexico: Taurus.

10.

Fowler

D. F. J.

(1995). Improving survey questions: Design and evaluation (1st ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

11.

Frankl

V. E.

(2005). Logotherapy, and moral imagination: “Will to meaning” in the classroom. Teaching Ethics: The Journal of the Society for Ethics Across the Curriculum, 5, 73-84.

12.

Fredricks

Blumenfeld

Friedel

Paris

(2003, March 11-13). School engagement. Presented at the Indicators of Positive Development Conference, Child Trends, Washington, DC.

13.

Garrett-Mayer

(2006, June 19). Statistics in psychosocial research lecture 8 factor analysis I. Retrieved from http://ocw.jhsph.edu/courses/statisticspsychosocialresearch/pdfs/lecture8.pdf

14.

Garris

Ahlers

Driskell

J. E.

(2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441-467.

15.

Habgood

M. P. J.

Ainsworth

S. E.

Benford

(2005a). Endogenous fantasy and learning in digital games. Simulation & Gaming, 36, 483-498.

16.

Habgood

M. P. J.

Ainsworth

S. E.

Benford

(2005b, July). Intrinsic fantasy: Motivation and affect in educational games made by children. Presented at the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Retrieved from http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/gr20/aied05/programme.htm

17.

Huizinga

(1955). Homo Ludens. A study of play-element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.

18.

Islas Sedano

(2012). Hypercontextualized games (Doctoral dissertation). University of Eastern Finland, Joensuu. Retrieved from http://epublications.uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0865-0/urn_isbn_978-952-61-0865-0.pdf

19.

Islas Sedano

Laine

T. H.

Vinni

Sutinen

(2007). Where is the answer?: The importance of curiosity in pervasive mobile games. In Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Future Play (pp. 46-53.). Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Association for Computing Machinery.

20.

Islas Sedano

Sutinen

Vinni

Laine

(2012). Designing hypercontextualized games: A case study with LIEKSAMYST. Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 257-270.

21.

Kirriemuir

McFarlane

(2004). Literature review in games and learning (No. 8). Bristol, UK: Nesta Futurelab. Retrieved from http://www.futurelab.org.uk/resources/publications-reports-articles/literature-reviews/

22.

Lan

Ponitz

C. C.

Miller

K. F.

Cortina

Perry

Fang

(2009). Keeping their attention: Classroom practices associated with behavioral engagement in first grade mathematics classes in China and the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 24, 198-211.

23.

Lippman

Rivers

(2008). Assessing school engagement: A guide for out-of-school time program practitioners. Child Trends Research Brief, 39, 1-5.

24.

Malone

T. W.

(1980). What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games (Doctoral dissertation). Stanford University, CA.

25.

Malone

T. W.

Lepper

M. R.

(1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomic model of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow

R. E.

Farr

(Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: III. Conative and affective process analysis (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

26.

Miller

C. H.

(2008). Digital storytelling, A creator’s guide to interactive entertainment (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Focal Press.

27.

Mueller

R. O.

(1996). Basic principles of structural equation modeling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York, NY: Springer.

28.

Paintner

C. V.

(2007). The relationship between spirituality and artistic expression: Cultivating the capacity for imagining. Spirituality in Higher Education, 3(2), 1-6. Retrieved from http://spirituality.ucla.edu/docs/newsletters/3/Paintner_Jan07.pdf

29.

Ravenscroft

McAlister

(2006). Digital games and learning in cyberspace: A dialogical approach. E-Learning and Digital Media, 3(1), 37-50.

30.

Reilly

(1974). Play as exploratory learning ( SageMark

ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

31.

Ryan

Deci

(2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.

32.

Salen

Zimmerman

(2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

33.

Sharan

Tan

I. G.-C.

(2008). Organizing schools for productive learning. New York, NY: Springer Science.

34.

SPSS. (2006). Introduction to Amos: Training course handbook. Chicago, IL: IBM Corporation.

35.

SPSS. (2012). SPSS® 20.0 for Windows, release 20.0.0. Amarok, NY: IBM Corporation.

36.

Walker

C. O.

Greene

B. A.

Mansell

R. A.

(2006). Identification with academics, Intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(1), 1-12.

37.

Whitton

(2011). Game engagement theory and adult learning. Simulation & Gaming, 42, 596-609.

38.

Wideman

Owston

Brown

Kushniruk

Pitts

K. C.

(2007). Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research. Simulation & Gaming, 38, 10-30.

Hypercontextualized Learning Games

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References