This article considers how the simulation game of DEVELOPMENT MONOPOLY provides insight into poverty and inequality dynamics in a development context. It first discusses how the game is rooted in theoretical and conceptual frameworks on poverty and inequality. Subsequently, it reflects on selected playing experiences, with special focus on the aspects of rule crafting, power relations, and game dynamics. Finally, the article assesses the simulation game’s learning effects, based on observations concerning the debriefing phase.
CoghlanC. L.HugginsD. W. (2004). “That’s not fair!”: A Simulation exercise in social stratification and structural inequality. Teaching Sociology, 32, 177-187.
4.
DornD. (1989). Simulation games: One more tool on the pedagogical shelf. Teaching Sociology, 17, 1-18.
5.
EnderM. G. (2004). Modified monopoly: Experiencing social class inequality. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(2), 249-254.
6.
FischerE. M. (2008). USA stratified monopoly: A simulation game about social class stratification. Teaching Sociology, 36, 272-282.
7.
GrofmanB. (1978). Playing monopoly: The state of the art, a review of the monopoly book and 1000 ways to win monopoly games. Simulation & Gaming, 9, 245-251.
8.
HromekR.RoffeyS. (2009). Promoting social and emotional learning with games: “Its Fun and We Learn Things.”Simulation & Gaming, 40, 626-644.
JessupM. M. (2001). Sociopoly: Life on the boardwalk. Teaching Sociology, 29, 102-109.
11.
KlabbersJ. (2006). Terminological ambiguity: Games and simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 446-463.
12.
LongN. (2001). Development sociology: Actor perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
13.
NorthD. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
14.
OlivierdeSardanJ.-P. (2005). Anthropology and development: Understanding contemporary social change. London, England: Zed Books.
15.
PetersV. A.VissersG. A. (2004). A simple classification model for debriefing simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 70-84.
16.
ScottJ. C. (1995). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. London, England: Yale University Press.
17.
SteinwachsB. (1992). How to facilitate a debriefing. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 186-195.
18.
Waldner-HaugrudL. K.KinneyW. J. (2003). Using monopoly to teach social stratification and inequality. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, Atlanta, GA. (Later published as Waldner, L. K., & Kinney, W. J. (2003). Playing monopoly as a strategy for teaching sociological ideas on class inequality. Sociological Imagination, 40(2), 111-130.)
