Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article combines the paradigm of social constructionism with the developing field of ludology. As games are intersubjective meaning-making activities, their study requires understanding of the nature of social constructions, and how such constructions are produced and interpreted: The formalist nature of ludological core concepts such as game world and game rules is often taken for granted, even though such structures exist only as social constructions. The article also considers the implications of the constructionist approach on the research of games: Such a perspective is especially important for the study of nonrepeatable, irreversible, distributed, and emergent forms of play.

Keywords

constructionist approach ephemera game studies intersubjectivity larp ludology MMORPGs pervasive games play replayability role-playing social constructionism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aarseth

(1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.

Aarseth

(2003). Playing research: Methodological approaches to game analysis (DAC 2003). Retrieved from http://hypertext.rmit.edu.au/dac/papers/Aarseth.pdf

Ahlroth

(2008). Leave the cat in the box: Some remarks on the possibilities of role-playing game criticism. In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Playground worlds. Creating and evaluating experiences of role-playing games. Jyväskylä, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/pw

THE AMAZING RACE. (2001). CBS.

Barkhuus

Chalmers

Tennent

Hall

Bell

Sherwood

Brown

(2005). Picking pockets on the lawn: The development of tactics and strategies in a mobile game (UbiComp 2005). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.60.4213

Berger

P. L.

Luckmann

(1966). The social construction of reality. A treatise in sociology of knowledge. (Mostly ref. the 1994 translation Todellisuuden sosiaalinen rakentuminen.) Tiedonsosiologinen tutkielma: Gaudeamus.

Björk

Holopainen

(2005). Patterns in game design. Hingham, MA: Charles River Media.

Bogost

(2009). Videogames are a mess (Keynote address at DiGRA 2009). Retrieved from www.bogost.com/writing/videogames_are_a_mess.shtml

Burr

(1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London, England: Routledge.

10.

Calleja

(2007). Digital games as designed experience: Reframing the concept of immersion Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand. Retrieved from www.gordoncalleja.com/GordonCalleja_Digital_Games_as_Designed_Experience.pdf

11.

CLUEDO. (1949). [Developed by Anthony E. Pratt, Hasbro. A.k.a. CLUE].

12.

Consalvo

(2007). Cheating. Gaining advantage in videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

13.

Copier

(2007). Beyond the magic circle. A network perspective on role-play in online games CHESS. Trad. Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Retrieved from http://igitur-archive.library.uu.nl/dissertations/2007-0710-214621/index.htm

14.

Crookall

Oxford

Saunders

(1987). Towards a reconceptualization of simulation. From representation to reality. Simulation/Games for Learning, 17, 147-170.

15.

Dansey

Stevens

Eglin

(2009). Contextually-ambiguous pervasive games: An Exploratory Study. DiGRA 2009. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/dl/db/09287.09154.pdf

16.

Dena

(2008). Emerging participatory culture practices: Player-created tiers in alternate reality games. International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 14, 41-57.

17.

Ericsson

(2004). Play to love. Reading Victor Turner’s “Liminal to Liminoid, in Play, Flow, and Ritual: An Essay in Comparative Symbology.” In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Beyond role and play: Tools, toys and theory for harnessing the imagination. Vantaa, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/brap

18.

E. T. THE EXTRA TERRESTIAL. (1982). [Developed by Atari]. Atari.

19.

EVE ONLINE. (2003). CCP.

20.

Fatland

(2005). Knutepunkt and nordic live role-playing: A crash course. In Bøckman

Hutchison

(Eds.), Dissecting Larp (pp. 11-20). (Collected papers for Knutepunkt 2005)

21.

Fine

G. A.

(1983). Shared fantasy: Role-playing games as social worlds. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

22.

Frasca

(1999). Ludology meets narratology: Similitude and differences between (Video)games and narrative. (Originally published in Finnish in Parnasso, 1999(3), 365-371). Retrieved from www.ludology.org/articles/ludology.htm

23.

Frasca

(2000). Ephemeral games: Is it barbaric to design videogames after Auschwitz? In Eskelinen

Koskimaa

(Eds.), Cybertext yearbook 2000. University of Jyväskylä. Retrieved from http://cybertext.hum.jyu.fi/index.php?browsebook=4

24.

Frasca

(2003). Simulation versus narrative: Introduction to Ludology. In Wolf

M. J. P.

Perron

(Eds.), The video game theory reader. London, England: Routledge. Retrieved from www.ludology.org/articles/VGT_final.pdf

25.

Fron

Fullerton

Morie

Pearce

(2007, September 24-28). The hegemony of play. In Baba

(Ed.), DiGRA 2007 situated play conference (pp. 309-318). Tokyo, Japan: University of Tokyo.

26.

Glas

(2006). Power asymmetry and fragmentation in a MMORPG. The case of the Gates of Ahn’Qiraj. In Santorineos

(Ed.), Gaming realities: A challenge for digital culture (pp. 32-39). Athens, Greece: FOURNOS Centre for the Digital Culture (Mediaterra 2006 Festival).

27.

Hacking

(1999). The social construction of what? (Mostly ref. the 2009 Finnish translation Mitä sosiaalinen konstruktionismi on? Vastapaino.) Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

28.

Hakkarainen

Stenros

(2002). The Meilahti school: Thoughts on role-playing. In Gade

Thorup

L. T.

Sander

(Eds.), As Larp grows up: Theory and methods in Larp. Copenhagen, Denmark: Projektgruppen KP03. Retrieved from www.laivforum.dk/kp03_book

29.

HAMLET. (2002). Martin Ericsson, Christopher Sandberg, Anna Ericsson and Martin Brodén.

30.

Harviainen

J. T.

(2008). Kaprow’s scions. In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Playground worlds. Creating and evaluating experiences of role-playing games. Jyväskylä, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/pw

31.

Hook

(2008). The children of treasure trap: History and trends of British live action role-play. In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Playground worlds. Creating and evaluating experiences of role-playing games. Jyväskylä, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/pw

32.

Huizinga

(1955). Homo ludens. A study of play element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon. (Original work published 1938).

33.

Järvinen

(2008). Games without frontiers: Theories and methods for game studies and design University of Tampere, Finland. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:978-951-44-7252-7

34.

Juul

(1999). A clash between game and narrative (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Copenhagen, Denmark. (Ref. 2001 English translation at www.jesperjuul.net/thesis)

35.

Juul

(2003). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). IT University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

36.

Juul

(2005). Half-real. Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

37.

Koljonen

(2004). “I could a tale unfold whose lightest word would harrow up thy Soul.” Lessons from Hamlet. In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Beyond role and play: Tools, toys and theory for harnessing the imagination. Vantaa, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/brap

38.

Korhonen

Montola

Arrasvuori

(2009). Understanding playful user experience through digital games. International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, Université de Technologie de Compiègne, France.

39.

Lehtonen

(1996). Merkitysten maailma: Kulttuurisen tekstintutkimuksen lähtökohtia [The world of meanings. Guidelines for cultural analysis of texts]. Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.

40.

Linderoth

(2008). The struggle for immersion. Narrative re-framings in world of warcraft. Proceedings of the [player] conference. ITU of Copenhagen, Denmark.

41.

Loponen

Montola

(2004). A semiotic view on diegesis construction. In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Beyond role and play: Tools, toys and theory for harnessing the imagination. Vantaa, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/brap

42.

Martin

Thompson

Chatfield

(Eds.). (2006). 2006 alternate reality games white paper. International Game Developers Association (IGDA). Retrieved from http://archives.igda.org/arg/resources/IGDA-AlternateRealityGames-Whitepaper-2006.pdf

43.

Mason

(2004). In search of the self. A survey of the first 25 years of Anglo-American role-playing theory. In Montola

Stenros

(Eds.), Beyond role and play: Tools, toys and theory for harnessing the imagination. Vantaa, Finland: Ropecon. Retrieved from www.ropecon.fi/brap

44.

MASS EFFECT. (2007). [Developed by Bioware]. Microsoft Game Studios, Electronic Arts.

45.

Mäyrä

(2008). An introduction to game studies. Games and culture. London, England: SAGE.

46.

MOMENTUM. (2006). [Developed by Staffan Jonsson et al.] Stockholm, Sweden.

47.

MONOPOLY. (1933). [Developed by Charles Darrow]. Hasbro.

48.

Montola

(2005). Designing goals for online role-players. In Proceedings DiGRA 2005. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University.

49.

Montola

(2008). The invisible rules of role-playing: A structural framework of role-playing process. International Journal of Role-Playing, 1, 22-36.

50.

Montola

Stenros

Waern

(2009). Pervasive games: Theory and design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.

51.

Morton

(2007). Larps and their cousins through the ages. In Donnis

Thorup

Gade

(Eds.), Lifelike. Copenhagen, Denmark: Projektgruppen KP07. Retrieved from www.liveforum.dk/kp07book

52.

MS. PAC-MAN. (1981). Midway.

53.

Myers

(2008). Play and punishment: The sad and curious case of Twixt. Proceedings of the [player] Conference, ITU of Copenhagen, Denmark.

54.

Myers

(2009). In search of a minimalist game. DiGRA 2009. Retrieved from www.digra.org/dl/db/09287.39520.pdf

55.

MYST ONLINE: URU LIVE. (2003). [Developed by Cyan Worlds]. Ubisoft and other developers.

56.

Ollila

(2009). Using prototyping and evaluation methods in iterative design of innovative mobile games (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tampere University of Technology, Finland.

57.

PAC-MAN. (1980). Namco.

58.

Pargman

Jakobsson

(2006). The magic is gone: A critical examination of the gaming situation. In Santorineos

(Ed.), Gaming realities: A challenge for digital culture (pp. 15-22). Athens, Greece: FOURNOS Centre for the Digital Culture (Mediaterra 2006 Festival).

59.

Pearce

(2009). Communities of play. Emergent cultures in multiplayer games and virtual worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

60.

Salen

Zimmerman

(2004). Rules of play. Game design fundamentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

61.

Searle

J. R.

(1969). Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.

62.

Searle

J. R.

(1995). The construction of social reality. London, England: Penguin.

63.

Searle

J. R.

(2010). Making the social world. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

64.

SECOND LIFE. (2003). Linden Labs.

65.

Sihvonen

(2009). Players unleashed! Modding the sims and the culture of gaming. University of Turku, Finland. Retrieved from http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-951-29-3941-1

66.

THE SIMS. (2000). [Developed by Maxis]. Electronic Arts.

67.

Sotamaa

(2009). The player’s game. Towards understanding player production among computer game cultures University of Tampere, Finland. Retrieved from http://acta.uta.fi/pdf/978-951-44-7651-8.pdf

68.

Stenros

Montola

Waern

Jonsson

(2007, September 24-28). Play it for real: Sustained seamless life/game merger in momentum. In Baba

(Ed.), DiGRA 2007 Situated Play conference. Tokyo, Japan: The University of Tokyo.

69.

Stenros

Paavilainen

Mäyrä

(2009). The many faces of sociability and social play in games. MindTrek, 2009 conference. Retrieved from http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1621841.1621857

70.

Stenros

Sotamaa

(2009). Commoditization of helping players play: Rise of the service paradigm. DiGRA 2009 conference. Retrieved from www.digra.org/dl/db/09287.24201.pdf

71.

Stenros

Waern

Montola

(2011). Studying the elusive experience in pervasive games. Simulation & Gaming. Retrived from: http://sag.sagepub.com/content/early/2011/10/12/1046878111422532.full.pdf+html

72.

Suominen

Koskimaa

Mäyrä

Sotamaa

(2009). Johdanto [Introduction]. In Suominen

Koskimaa

Mäyrä

Sotamaa

(Eds.), Pelitutkimuksen vuosikirja 2009 [Game Studies Yearbook 2009] (pp. i-vi). Retrieved from www.pelitutkimus.fi/vuosikirja-2009

73.

Taylor

T. L.

(2009). Negotiating play: The process of rule construction in professional computer gaming. Unpublished presentation in DiGRA 2009 Conference.

74.

THERE.COM. (2003-2010). Makena technologies.

75.

Tsuchiya

(1999). The unique contribution of gaming/simulation. In Saunders

Severn

(Eds.), Simulation & gaming research yearbook (Vol. 7, pp. 46-57). London, England: Kogan Page.

76.

Walton

K. L.

(1990). Mimesis as make-believe. On the foundations of the representational arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

77.

WORLD OF WARCRAFT. (2004). [Developed by Blizzard]. Blizzard Entertainment.

Social Constructionism and Ludology

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References