This article examines the state of assessment in simulation and gaming over the past 40 years. While assessment has come slowly to many disciplines, members of the simulation and gaming community have been assessing the educational effectiveness of their experiential activities for years, in part because of skepticism from more traditional quarters that gaming and simulation are appropriate techniques to use in the classroom. These past efforts to demonstrate educational value usually went by names other than “assessment.” This article reviews research published in this journal using the keyword “assessment” plus a sample of pre-1990 meta-studies on evidence of educational effectiveness. The authors conclude with a discussion of two games, one familiar (SIMSOC) and one new (GLOBAL JUSTICE GAME) that may assist the reader in thinking about assessment strategies and related issues that need to be considered, in particular the role of agency versus structure.
Baker, P. (1985). Does the sociology of teaching inform Teaching Sociology? Teaching Sociology, 12(3), 361-375.
2.
Barnes, D., Engelland, B., Matherne, C., Martin, W., Orgeron, C., Ring, J., et al. (2008). Developing a psychometrically sound measure of collegiate teaching proficiency. College Student Journal , 42, 199-213.
3.
Boocock, S. (1994). The Johns Hopkins games program. Simulation & Gaming, 25, 172-178.
4.
Bredemeier, M., & Greenblat, C. (1981). The educational effectiveness of simulation games: A synthesis of findings. Simulation & Gaming, 12(3), 307-332.
5.
Brown, M. (2008). Student perceptions of teaching evaluation. Instructional Psychology, 35, 177-181.
6.
Cashin, W. (1999). Student ratings of teaching: Uses and misuses . In Peter Selden and Associates (Eds.). Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions (pp. 25-44). Bolton, MA: Anker .
7.
Cherryholmes, C. (1966). Some current research on effectiveness of educational simulation: Implications for alternative strategies. American Behavioral Scientist, 10, 4-7.
8.
Chin, J. (2002). Is there a scholarship of teaching in Teaching Sociology? Teaching Sociology, 30, 53-62.
9.
Coleman, J. (1961). The adolescent society. New York: Free Press.
10.
Dukes, R. (1991). Worlds apart: Collective action in simulated agrarian and industrial societies. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
11.
Emerson, R., Fretz, R., & Shaw, L. (1995). Writing ethnographic field notes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Foster, J., Lachman, A., & Mason, R. (1980). Verstehen, cognition and the impact of political simulations: It's not as simple as it seems. Simulation & Gaming, 11(2), 223-241.
13.
Gamson, W. (2000). SIMSOC: Simulated Society (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
14.
Gamson, W. (2007). GLOBAL JUSTICE GAME. www.globaljusticegame.mrap.info
15.
Gamson, W., & Stambaugh, R. (1978). The model underlying SIMSOC. Simulation & Gaming, 9(2), 131-157.
16.
Gosen, J., & Washbush, J. (2004). A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming, 35(2), 270-293.
17.
Grauerholz, E. (2008). Trends in SOTL published in Teaching Sociology (2004-2008). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Boston.
18.
Guetzkow, H., Alger, C., Brody, R., Noel, R., & Snyder, R. (1963). Simulation in international relations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
19.
Guetzkow, H., & Valdez, J. (1981). Simulated international processes: Theories and research in global modeling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Horn, R., & Cleaves, A. (Eds.). (1980). The guide to simulations/games for education and training (4th ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
21.
Howery, C. (2001). Assessment: It's the right thing to do. In C. Holm & W. Johnson (Eds.), Assessing student learning in sociology (2nd ed., pp. 4-9). Washington, DC : American Sociological Association.
22.
Hsu, E. (1989). Role-event gaming simulation in management education . Simulation & Gaming, 20(4), 409-438.
23.
Livingston, S., Fennessey, G., Coleman, J., Edwards, K., & Kidder, S. (1973). The Hopkins games program: Final report on seven years of research (Report No. 155). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for Social Organization of Schools.
24.
Petranek, C. (2000). Written debriefing: The next vital step in learning with simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 31, 108-118.
25.
Petranek, C., Corey, S., & Black, R. (1992). Three levels of learning in simulations: Participation, debriefing and journal writing. Simulation & Gaming, 23(2), 174-185.
26.
Pierfy, D. (1977). Comparative simulation game research: Stumbling blocks and steppingstones. Simulation & Gaming, 8(2), 255-268.
27.
Raynolds, P. (1997). On taming the evaluation monster: Toward holistic assessments of transformational training effects. Simulation & Gaming, 28(3), 286-316.
28.
Seldin, P. (1999). Current practices-good and bad-nationally. In Peter Selden and Associates (Eds.). Changing practices in evaluating teaching: A practical guide to improved faculty performance and promotion/tenure decisions (pp. 1-24). Bolton, MA: Anker.
29.
Shirts, R.G. (1969/1974). STARPOWER. Del Mar, CA: SIMILEII.
30.
Smith, C., & Kornblum, W. (1989). In the field (3rd ed.). New York: Praeger.
