Guest Editorial: Artifact assessment versus theory testing

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bizzochi, J. , & Woodbury, R. F. (2003). A case study in the design of interactive narrative: The subversion of the interface. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 550-568.

Blasi, L. , & Alfonso, B. (2006). Increasing the transfer of simulation technology from R&D into school settings: An approach to evaluation from overarching vision to individual artifact in education. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 245-267.

Cecchini, A. , & Rizzi, P. (2001). Is urban gaming useful? Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 507-521.

Dugdale, J. , Pallamin, N. , & Pavard, B. (2006). An assessment of a mixed reality environment: Toward an ethnomethodological approach. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 226-244.

García-Carbonell, A. , Rising, B. , Montero, B. , & Watts, F. (2001). Simulation/gaming and the acquisition of communicative competence in another language. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 481-491.

Klabbers, J. H. G. (2001). The emerging field of simulation & gaming: Meanings of a retrospect. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 471-480.

Klabbers, J. H. G. (2003a). Gaming and simulation: Principles of a science of design. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 569-591.

Klabbers, J. H. G. (2003b). Simulation and gaming: Introduction to the art and science of design. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 488-494.

Klabbers, J. H. G. (2004). On cross-fertilization: A tale for two JASAG gaming communities. Studies in Simulation & Gaming, 14(1), 28-37.

10.

Klabbers, J. H. G. (2006). A framework for artifact assessment and theory testing. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 155-173.

11.

Kriz, W. C. (2003). Creating effective learning environments and learning organizations through gaming simulation design. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 495-511.

12.

Kriz, W. C. , & Hense, J. U. (2006). Theory-oriented evaluation for the design of and research in gaming and simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 268-283.

13.

Mallon, B. , & Webb, B. (2006). Applying a phenomenological approach to games analysis: A case study. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 209-225.

14.

Meadows, D. L. (2001). Tools for understanding the limits to growth: Comparing a simulation and a game. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 522-536.

15.

Noy, A. , Raban, D. R. , & Ravid, G. (2006). Testing social theories in computer-mediated communication through gaming and simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 174-194.

16.

Romme, A. G. L. , & Putzel, R. (2003). Designing management education: Practice what you teach. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 512-530.

17.

Rouchier, J. , & Robin, S. (2006). Information perception and price dynamics in a continuous double auction. Simulation & Gaming, 37(2), 195-208.

18.

Ruohomäki, V. (2003). Simulation gaming for organizational development. Simulation & Gaming, 34(4), 531-549.

19.

Shiratori, R. , Arai, K. , & Kato, F. (Eds.). (2005). Gaming, simulations, and society: Research scope and perspective. Tokyo: Springer.

20.

Starkey, B. A. , & Blake, E. L. (2001). Simulation in international relations education. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 537-551.

21.

Thorelli, H. B. (2001). Ecology of international business simulation games. Simulation & Gaming, 32(4), 492-506.