New technologies are transforming the business simulation industry. The technologies come from research in computational fields of science, and they endow simulations with new capabilities and qualities. These capabilities and qualities include computerized behavioral simulations, online feedback and coaching, advanced interfaces, learning on demand, and the ability to teach specific knowledge. While describing the new technologies, this article also describes the industry’s transformation by estimating its size, presenting trends affecting demand and supply, and analyzing its structure. It is believed the industry is going through Schumpeter’s process of creative destruction.
Adkins, S. (2002, March). Executive summary. The 2002 US market for e-learning simulation: The shape of the next generation e-learning market. Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://www.brandonhall.com/public/execsums/execsum_simmarket.pdf
2.
Aldrich, C. (2001, September 1). The state of simulations: Soft-skill simulations emerge as a powerful new form of e-learning. OnlineLearning. Retrieved fall 2001, from http://www.trainingmag.com/training/search/search_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1224575
3.
Brandon-Hall. (2002, March). Executive summary of E-learning simulations: Tools and services for creating software, business, and technical skills simulations. Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://www.brandonhall.com/public/execsums/execsum_simulations.pdf
4.
Burgess, T. F. (1991). The use of computerized management and business simulation in the United Kingdom. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 174-195.
5.
Cascio, W. J., & Gilbert, G. R. (1980). Making dollars and sense out of management development. In R. D. Huseman (Ed.), Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the National Academy of Management(pp. 95-98). Detroit: Academy of Management.
6.
Chang, M. T. J. (2003). The use of business gaming in HongKong academic institutions. Simulation& Gaming, 34, 358-366.
7.
Chiesl, N. E. (1979). The dynamic aspects of interactive gaming puts the realism into gaming. Developments in Business Simulations & Experiential Exercises, 6, 271-276.
8.
Chiesl, N. E. (1982). File access is the essential prerequisite to time-flexible and interactive computer simulation. Developments in Business Simulations & Experiential Exercises, 9, 264-268.
9.
Chiesl, N. E. (1986). Simulation with discrete and continuous mathematical modeling. Developments in Business Simulations & Experiential Exercises, 13, 244-247.
10.
Chiesl, N. E. (1990). Interactive real time simulation. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning(pp. 141-158). East Brunswick, NJ/London: Nichols/GP.
11.
Davies, P. (2003, July). Simulation: Bringing e-learning to a new level. Retrieved July 18, 2003, from http://www.computeruser.com/articles/2207,1,1,1,0701,03.html
12.
Fanelli, C. (2000). Behrman commits to e-learning. Buyouts, 13(20), 10-11. Retrieved October 5, 2002, from Business Source Premier database.
13.
Faria, A. J. (1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation & Games, 18, 207-224.
14.
Faria, A. J. (1998). Business simulation games: Current usage levels—A ten year update. Simulation & Gaming, 29, 295-308.
15.
Faria, A. J., & Nulsen, R. (1996). Business simulation games: Current usage levels—A ten year update. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 23, 22-28.
16.
Faria, A. J., & Wellington, W. (2004). Asurvey of simulation game users, former-users and never-users. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 178-207.
17.
Frazis, H., Gittleman, M., Horrigan, M., & Joyce, M. (1998). Results from the 1995 survey of employerprovided training. Monthly Labor Review, 121(6), 3-13. Retrieved November 2003, from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/1998/06/art1full.pdf
18.
Fritzsche, D. J., Biggs, W. D., Cotter, R. V., Jensen, R. L., & Wolfe, J. (1998). What is the future of business gaming?Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 25, 263-263.
19.
Fritzsche, D. J., Faria, A. J., Goosen, K. R., & Thavikulwat, P. (2002). Simulation distribution alternatives: Author/user considerations. Developments in Business Simulation& Experiential Learning, 29, 65-66.
20.
Gold, S. C. (1992). Modeling short-run cost and production functions in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 417-430.
21.
Gold, S. C., & Pray, T. F. (1984). Modeling market-and firm-level demand functions in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Games, 15, 346-363.
22.
Gold, S. C., & Pray, T. F. (1989). The production frontier: Modeling production in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Games, 20, 300-318.
23.
Gold, S. C., & Pray, T. F. (1990). Modeling demand in computerized business simulations. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning(pp. 117-138). East Brunswick, NJ/London: Nichols/GP.
24.
Haapaniemi, P. (2002, June). Smart thinking: Great ideas rarely come out of thin air. Employees need ongoing training to remain focused and engaged. In CEO guide: Innovation delivered. (Suppl.). Retrieved June 12, 2003, from http://www.chiefexecutive.net/ceoguides/june2002/p26.htm
25.
Hoban, V. (2001, November). It’s learning, Jim, but not as we know it. Management Today, pp. 96-98.
26.
Industry report. (1995). Training, 32(10), 37-82.
27.
Industry report.. (1998). Training, 35(10), 43-76.
28.
Industry report. (2003). Training, 40(9), 19-45.
29.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
30.
Keys, J. B., & Wolfe, J. A. (1990). The role of management games and simulations in education and research. Journal of Management, 16, 307-336.
31.
Lane, D. C. (1995). On a resurgence of management simulations and games. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 604-625.
32.
Langton, C. G. (Ed.). (1989). Artificial life. A proceedings volume in the Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
33.
Mathieu, J. E., & Leonard, R. L. (1987). Applying utility concepts to a training program in supervisory skills: A time-based approach. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 316-335.
34.
McKenna, R. J. (1991). Business computerized simulation: The Australian experience. Simulation& Gaming, 22, 36-62.
35.
Mergen, A. E., & Pray, T. F. (1992). Modeling total quality elements into a strategy-oriented simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 277-297.
36.
Patz, A. L. (1987). Open system simulations and simulation based research. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 14, 160-164.
37.
Patz, A. L. (1990). Open system simulation. In J. W. Gentry (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning(pp. 159-176). East Brunswick, NJ/London: Nichols/GP.
38.
Patz, A. L. (1993). A linear programming approach to open system total enterprise simulations. Development in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 20, 86-89.
39.
Plous, S. (1993). The psychology of judgment and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
40.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
41.
Pray, T. F., & Methé, D. T. (1991). Modeling radical changes in technologywithin strategy-oriented business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 19-35.
42.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Quinn, J. B. (1985). Managing innovation: Controlled chaos. Harvard Business Review, 63(3), 73-84.
44.
Sauer, P. (2001). E-learning emerges at the next horizon in corporate training with promises of cost-savings. Chemical Market Reporter, 260(9), F8-F12.
45.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1989). The theory of economic development(R. Opie, Trans.). New Brunswick, NJ: Translation. (Original work published 1911)
46.
Simon, H. A. (1994). The sciences of the artificial(8th ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior(4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
48.
Summers, G. J. (1999a). Analyzing managers’ judgments and decisions with an educational business simulation. Developments in Business Simulations & Experiential Learning, 26, 58-64.
49.
Summers, G. J. (1999b). Modeling innovation as a process of design in educational business simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 26, 146-152.
50.
Teach, R. D. (1990). Demand equations for business simulations with market segments. Simulation& Gaming, 21, 423-442.
51.
Thavikulwat, P. (1989). Modeling market demand in a demand-independentbusiness simulation. Simulation & Games, 20, 439-458.
52.
Thavikulwat, P. (1991). Modeling the human component in computer-based business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 22, 350-359.
53.
Thavikulwat, P. (1992). Product quality in computerized business simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 431-441.
54.
2001 e-learning user survey. (2001, November 30). Learning& Training Innovations. Retrieved September 20, 2002, from http://www.ltimagazine.com/ltimagazine/data/articlestandard/ltimagazine/482001/3007/article.pdf
55.
Urban, T. F., Ferris, G. R., Crowe, D. F., & Miller, R. L. (1985). Management training: Justify costs or say goodbye. Training and Development Journal, 39(3), 68-71.
56.
Wexley, K. N., & Baldwin, T. T. (1986). Management development. 1986 Yearly Review of Management, 12, 277-294.
