In this article, the authors investigate the benefits and drawbacks of using group model building in a group decision room. An approach to group model building adapted for use in a group decision room is described. The authors then determine the feasibility of such an approach in a pilot study and compare the results of the traditional version with those of the electronic version used by a group of 32 graduate students. Specifically, the authors assess the effects on quality of communication, satisfaction, knowledge (of others’ opinions and of the problem), consensus, and commitment. The evaluation shows that the electronic version yields positive results similar to the nonelectronic version. This result strengthens the idea that electronic support can be used to avoid the direct costs of convening groups, as is necessary in the traditional form. A number of improvements to both the intervention and the evaluation procedure are discussed.
Akkermans, H. A. (1995). Modelling with managers: Participative business modelling for effective strategic decision-making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Eindhoven University of Technology.
2.
Andersen, D. F.
, & Richardson, G. P. (1997). Scripts for group model building. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 107-130.
3.
Cook, T. D.
,& Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis for field settings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4.
Delbecq, A. L.
, van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
5.
Doyle, J.
, Radzicki, M.,& Trees, W. S. (1998). Measuring change in mental models of dynamic systems: An exploratory study. Proceedings of the 1998 International System Dynamics Conference(pp. 30-31). Montreal, Québec, Canada.
6.
Eden, C.
(1989). Using cognitive mapping for strategic options development and analysis (SODA). In J. Rosenhead (Ed.), Rational analysis for a problematic world(pp. 21-42). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
7.
Forrester, J. W.
(1980). Information sources for modelling the national economy. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75, 555-574.
8.
Huber, G. P.
(1990). A theory of the effects of advanced information technology on organizational design, intelligence, and decision making. Academy of Management Review, 15(1), 47-71.
9.
Huz, S.
, Andersen, D. F., Richardson, G. P., & Boothroyd, R. (1997). A framework for evaluating systems thinking interventions: An experimental approach to mental health system change. System Dynamics Review, 13(2), 149-170.
10.
Janis, I. L.
,& Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
11.
Jessup, L.
,& Valacich, J. S. (1993). On the study of group support systems: An introduction to group support system research and development. In L. Jessup& J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: Newperspectives. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Nunamaker, J. F.
, Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R.,& George, J. F. (1991). Electronic meetings to support group work. Communications of the ACM, 34(7), 40-61.
13.
Pinsonneault, A.
, & Kraemer, K. L. (1990). The effects of electronic meeting support on group processes and outcomes: An assessment of the empirical research. European Journal of Operational Research, 46, 143-161.
14.
Richardson, G. P.
,& Andersen, D. F. (1995). Teamwork in group model building. System Dynamics Review, 11(2), 113-137.
15.
Robey, D.
,& Newman, M. (1996). Sequential patterns in information systems development: An application of a social process model. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 14(1), 30-63.
16.
Trigg, R. H.
, & Anderson, S. I. (Eds.). (1996). Human Computer Interaction[Special issue], 11.
17.
Underwood, S. E. (1984). An evaluation of a participative technique for strategic planning. Unpublished paper, College of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Ann Arbor.
18.
Vennix, J.A.M. (1990). Mental models and computer models: Design and evaluation of a computer-based learning environment for policy making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen.
19.
Vennix, J.A.M.
(1996). Group model building: Facilitating team learning using system dynamics. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
20.
Vennix, J.A.M.
, Andersen, D. F., Richardson, G. P.,& Rohrbaugh, J. (1992). Model-building for group decision support: Issues and alternatives in knowledge elicitation. Modelling for Learning: Special Issue of the European Journal of Operational Research, 59(1), 28-41.
21.
Vennix, J.A.M.
, Gubbels, J. W., Post, D.,& Poppen, H. J. (1990). Astructured approach to knowledge elicitation in conceptual model building. System Dynamics Review, 6(2), 194-208.
22.
Vennix, J.A.M.
, Richardson, G. P.,& Andersen, D. F. (1997). Foreword: Group model building, art, and science. System Dynamics Review, 13(2).
23.
Vennix, J.A.M.
,& Rouwette, E.A.J.A. (1998, July). Group model building assessment studies: Order out of chaos. Paper presented at the 1998 International System Dynamics Conference, Québec City.
24.
Vennix, J.A.M.
, Scheper, W. J., & Willems, R. (1993, July). Group model building: What does the client think of it?Paper presented at the 1993 International System Dynamics Conference, Cancun.
25.
Ventana Corporation
. (1994). Group Systems for Windows reference manual. Tucson, AZ: Author.
26.
Verburgh, L. (1994). Participative policy modeling applied to the health care insurance industry. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
