The study investigates the relationship between cohesiveness and group effectiveness. The link between the two constructs is predicted to be moderated by the orientation (whether task or nontask) and strength of work group norms. Datafrom a 1995 survey of army units in the Danish military were used. Multiple regression was used to test hypotheses, and the results indicated strong supportfor the existence of a moderator
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Argote, L. (1989). Agreement about norms and work-unit effectiveness: Evidence from the field. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 10(2), 131-140.
2.
Argote, L. , & McGrath, J. E. (1993). Group process in organizations. In C. L. Cooper & I. T. Robertson (Eds.), International review of organizational psychology (pp. 333-389). New York: John Wiley.
3.
Babakus, E. , Ferguson, C. E., & Joreskog, K. G. (1987). The sensitivity of confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis to violations of measurement scale and distributional assumptions. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(2), 222-228.
4.
Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the iron cage: Concertive control in self-managing teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408-437.
5.
Baron, R. M. , & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
6.
Benne, K. D. , & Sheats, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4(2), 41-50.
7.
Berkowitz, L. (1954). Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations, 7(4), 509-519.
8.
Bettenhausen, K. , & Murnighan, J. K. (1985). The emergence of norms in competitive decision making groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30(3), 350-372.
9.
Cohen, S. , & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357.
10.
Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11.
Cox, E.P.I. (1980). The optimal numberof response alternatives for a scale: Areview. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 407-422.
12.
Dion, K. L. , & Evans, C. R. (1992). On cohesiveness: Reply to Keyton and other critics of the construct. Smnall Group Research, 23(2), 242-250.
13.
Evans, C. R. , & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: Ameta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22(2), 175-186.
14.
Feldman, D. C. (1984). The development and enforcement of group norms. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 47-53.
15.
Festinger, L. , Back, W., Schachter, S., Kelley, H. H., & Thibaut, J. W. (1952). Theory and experiment in social communication. Ann Arbor, MI: Edward Brothers.
16.
Forsythe, D. (1990). Group dynamics. Needleham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
17.
Gladstein, D. (1984). Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 499-517.
18.
Goodman, P. S. , Devadas, R., & Hughson, T.L.G. (1988). Groups and productivity: Analyzing the effectiveness of self-managing teams. In J. P. Campbell & R. J. Campbell (Eds.), Productivity in organizations (pp. 295-327). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Hackman, J. R. , & Morris, C. G. (1978). Group process: Papers from advances in experimental social psychology. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1-66). New York: Academic Press.
20.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
21.
Keyton, J. (1992). Comment on Evans and Dion: Still more on group cohesion. Small Group Research, 23(2), 237-241.
22.
Levine, J. , & Moreland, R. (1990). Conflicts within small groups. Progress in small groups research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
23.
Levine, J. M. (1980). Reaction to opinion deviance in small groups. In P. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 84-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction & perfornance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147-174.
26.
Mowday, R. T. , & Sutton, R. I. (1993). Organizational behavior: Linking individual and groups to organizational contexts. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 195-229.
27.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42(9), 771-785.
28.
Mullen, B. , & Copper, C. (1994). The relationship between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-227.
29.
Orasanu, J. , & Salas, E. (1993). Team decision making in complex environments. In Klein, Orasanu, Crandall, & Jacobs (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 327-345). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
30.
Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe n for effect sizes. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157-159.
31.
Rosenthal, R. (1979). The "file-drawerproblem" andtolerance fornull results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638-641.
32.
Schachter, S. , Ellertson, N., McBride, D., & Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental study of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 4(4), 299-338.
33.
Seashore, S. E. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Institute for Social Research.
34.
Shadish, W. R. , Doherty, M., & Montgomery, L. M. (1989). How many studies are in the file drawer? An estimate from the family/marital psychotherapy literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 9(5), 589-603.
35.
Shaw, M. (1932). A comparison of individuals and small groups in the rational solution of complex problems. American Journal of Psychology, 44(3), 491-504.
36.
Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Stogdill, R. M. (1972). Group productivity, drive and cohesiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8(1), 26-43.
38.
Tziner, A. , & Vardi, Y. (1982). Effects of command style and cohesiveness on the performance effectiveness of self-selected tank crews. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6), 769-775.
39.
Van de Ven, A. H. , & Ferry, D. L. (1980). Measuring and assessing organizations. New York: John Wiley.
40.
Wholey, J. S. , Hatry, H. P., & Newcomer, K. E. (1994). Handbook of practical program evaluation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
41.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & Lowe, C. A. (1986). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547-558.
42.
Zander, A. (1979). The psychology of group processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 417-451.
