This conceptual article presents three propositions designed to demonstrate a theoretical relationship between the groupthinkand escalation commitmentmodels. These propositions argue that groups exhibiting groupthink characteristics are more likely to escalate commitment to a losing course of action than are groups not exhibiting groupthink characteristics.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldag, R. J. , & Fuller, S. R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 533-552.
2.
Arkes, H. , & Blumer, C. (1985). Thepsychology of sunk cost. Organizational Behaviorand Human Decision Processes, 35, 125-140.
3.
Back, K. W. (1951). Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46,9-23.
4.
Bazerman, M. H. , Giuliano, T., & Appelman, A. (1984). Escalation of commitment in individual and group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 33, 141-152.
5.
Bernthal, P. R. , & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organization Management, 18, 66-87.
6.
Brockner, J. (1992). The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: Toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review, 17, 39-61.
7.
Brockner, J. , & Rubin, J. Z. (1985). Entrapment in escalating conflicts: A socialpsychological analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
8.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communications. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
9.
Festinger, L. (1954). Atheory of social comparisonprocesses. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
10.
Festinger, L. , Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing.New York: Harper.
11.
Goltz, S. M. (1992). A sequential learning analysis of decisions in organizations to escalate investments despite continuing costs or losses. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 561-574.
12.
Heinemann, G. D. , Farrell, M. P., & Schmitt, M. H. (1994). Groupthinktheory and research: Implications for decision making in geriatric health care teams. Educational Gerontology, 20, 71-85.
13.
Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 44-76.
14.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
15.
Kahneman, D. , & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 43, 263-291.
16.
Kameda, K. , & Sugimori, S. (1993). Psychological entrapment in group decision making: An assigned decision rule and a groupthink phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 282-292.
17.
Kroon, M.B.R. , van Kreveld, D., & Rabbie, J. M. (1992). Group versus individual decision making: Effects of accountability and gender on groupthink. Small Group Research, 23, 427-458.
18.
Leanna, C. R. (1985). Apartial test of Janis's groupthink model: Effects of group cohesiveness andleaderbehaviorondefectivedecisionmaking. Journal of Management, 11, 5-17.
19.
Longley, J. , & Pruitt, D. G. (1980). Groupthink: A critique of Janis's theory. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 507-513). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Luechauer, D. L. (1989). Groupthink revisited: A dramaturgical approach. Paper presented at the meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
21.
McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 250-260.
22.
Moorhead, G. , Ference, R., & Neck, C. P. (1991). Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle Challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations, 44, 539-550.
23.
Moorhead, G. , & Montanari, J. R. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 39, 399-410.
24.
Mullen, B. , Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 2, 189-204.
25.
Neck, C. P. , & Moorhead, G. (1992). Jury deliberations in the trial of U.S. v. John DeLorean: A case analysis of groupthink avoidance and an enhanced framework. Human Relations, 45,10-10.
26.
Park, W. (1990). A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 229-245.
27.
Ross, J. , & Staw, B. M. (1986). Expo 86: An escalation prototype. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31, 274-297.
28.
Ross, J. , & Staw, B. M. (1993). Organizational escalation and exit: Lessons from the Shoreham nuclear power plant. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 701-732.
29.
Schaubroeck, J. , & Williams, S. (1993). TypeAbehaviorpattern and escalating commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 862-867.
30.
Staw, B. M. (1976). Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 27-44.
31.
Staw, B. M. (1981). The escalation of commitment to a course of action. Academy of Management Review, 6, 577-587.
32.
Staw, B. M. , & Fox, F. V. (1977). Escalation: The determinants of commitment to a chosen course of action. Human Relations, 30, 431-450.
33.
Staw, B. M. , & Ross, J. (1987). Behavior in escalation situations: Antecedents, prototypes, and solutions. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (vol. 9, pp. 39-78). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
34.
Steiner, I. D. (1982). Heuristic models of groupthink. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 503-524). New York: Academic Press.
35.
Street, M. D. (1997). Groupthink: An examination of theoretical issues, implications, and future research. Small Group Research, 28(1), 72-93.
36.
't Hart, P. (1991). Irving L. Janis's victims of groupthink. Political Psychology, 12, 247-278.
37.
Turner, M. E. , Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 781-796.
38.
Whyte, G. (1986). Diffusion of responsibility: Effects on the escalation tendency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 408-415.
39.
Whyte, G. (1989). Groupthink reconsidered. Academy of Management Review, 14,40-56.
40.
Whyte, G. (1993). Escalating commitment in individual and group decision making: A prospect theory approach. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 430-455.
