In a study on the person-by-situation interaction on leadership, 9 unacquaintedfemale and male students completed a personality-adjective list before they cooperated in 3 triads on 4 different assessment-center tasks, each time with 2 new partners. The rotation design was run with 4 samples of 9 subjects each, half of them men, half women. Each subject's contribution to the group process was ranked by the team members and by 2 observers. In each of the 4 9-person samples the main effect of persons was much larger than the person-by-task (and group-composition) interaction effect. The personality pattern Low Emotional Stability/Low Independence was clearly a hindrance to influence for men, butnot for women. Social roles modify the influence of personality characteristics on leadership behavio, attenuating the personality influence more with women than with men. Finally, some practical conclusions are drawn.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aries, E. J. , Gold, C., & Weigel, R. H. (1983). Dispositional and situational influence on dominance behavior in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 779-786.
2.
Borgatta, E. F. , & Bales, R. F. (1953). The consistency of subject behavior and the reliability of scoring in interaction process analysis. American Sociological Review, 18, 566-569.
3.
Brandstatter, H. (1988). Sechzehn Personlichkeits-Adjektivskalen (16 PA) als Forschungs instrument anstelle des 16 PF [Sixteen Personality Adjective Scales (16 PA) as a substitute for the 16 PF in research settings]. Zeitschriftflir Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 35, 370-391.
4.
Brandstatter, H. (1992, December). Becoming an entrepreneur-a question of personality structure? Paper presented at the Conference on Perspectives in Economic Psychology in honor of Karl-Erik Wirneryd, Stockholm, Sweden.
5.
Brandstiitter, H. (1994). Pleasure of leisure-pleasure of work. Personality makes the difference. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 931-946.
6.
Brandstiitter, H. , Filipp, G., & Drescher, P. (1992). Zur Validitit der 16 PersonlichkeitsAdjektivskalen (16PA) [Validity of the 16 Personality Adjective Scales]. Zeitschriftfiir Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 13, 53-67.
7.
Buss, D. M. , & Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to pcIrsonality. Psychological Review, 90, 105-126.
8.
Carbonell, J. L. (1984). Sex roles and leadership revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 44-49.
9.
Epstein, S. , & O'Brien, E. J. (1985). The person-situation debate in histonrcal and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513-537.
10.
Fleischer, R. A. , & Chertkoff, J. M. (1986). Effects of dominance and sex on leader selection in dyadic work groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 94-99.
11.
Harris, M. , Becker, A., & Smith, D. (1993). Does the assessment center scoring method affect the cross-situational consistency of ratings?Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 675-678.
12.
Haythorn, W. (1953). The influence of individual members on the characteristics of small groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 276-284.
13.
Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol 2, pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
14.
Kenny, D. A. , & Hallmark, B. W. (1992). Rotation designs in leadershipresearch. Leadership Quarterly, 3, 25-41.
15.
Kenny, D. A. , & Zaccaro, S. J. (1983). An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 678-685.
16.
Kenrick, D. T. , & Funder, D. C. (1988). Profiting from controversy: Lessons from the person-situation debate. American Psychologist, 43, 23-34.
17.
Landy, F. J. , & Shankster, L. J. (1994). Personnel selection and placement. Annual Review of Psychology, 45, 261-296.
18.
Megargee, E. I. (1969). Influence of sex roles on the manifestation of leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 377-382.
19.
Neuberger, O. (1990). Fuhren und gefuhrt werden [Leading and being led] (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Enke.
20.
Nyquist, L. V. , & Spence, J. T. (1986). Effects of dispositional dominance and sex role expectations on leadership behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 87-93.
21.
Sackett, P. R. , & Wilson, M. A. (1982). Factors affecting the consensus judgement process in managerial assessment centers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 10-17.
22.
Schneewind, K. A. , Schroder, G., & Cattell, R. B. (1983). Der 16-Personlichkeits-Faktoren-Test. 16PF [The 16-Personality-Factor-Test. 16PF]. Bern, Switzerland: Huber.
23.
Schneider, J. R. , & Schmitt, N. (1992). An exercise design approach to understanding assessment center dimensions and exercise constructs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 32-41.
24.
Schuler, H. , Funke, U., Moser, K., & Donat, M. (1995). Personalauswahl in Forschung und Entwicklung [Personnel selection for industrial research and technical development]. Gottingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
25.
Snyder, M. , & Ickes, W. (1985). Personality and social behavior. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 883-947). New York: Random House.
26.
Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
27.
Strobl, S. (1994). Urteilsbildung im assessment center [Person perception in the assessment center]. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Vienna, Austria.
28.
Zaccaro, S. J. , Foti, R. J., & Kenny, D. A. (1991). Self-monitoring and trait-based variance in leadership: An investigation of leader flexibility across multiple group situations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 308-315.
