A small group model was tested that traced the path by which communication motives influenced interaction involvement and loneliness and the ways that these factors, in turn, influenced group satisfaction. Results indicated that pleasure was a reason for communicating responsively, whereas escape, control, and inclusion were not reasons. Escape was not a motive reported by those who were lonely. With regard to group satisfaction, it was found that loneliness was a mediatingfactor in that members who interacted responsively were not lonely, and those who were not lonely reported satisfaction with the group. Finally, there was a direct link between the need for affection and satisfaction. Implications of the model's findings support the need for communication skills training and understanding members' motives for interacting in ongoing task groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Barbato, C. A. , & Perse, E. M. (1992). Interpersonal communication motives and the life position of elders. Communication Research, 19, 516-531.
2.
Bell, R. A. (1987). Social involvement. In J. C. McCroskey & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Personality and interpersonal communication (pp. 195-242). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Bell, R. A. , & Daly, J. A. (1985). Some communicator correlates of loneliness. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 50, 121-142.
4.
Bormann, E. G. (1990). Small group communication: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Cegala, D. J. (1981). Interaction involvement: A cognitive dimension of communicative competence. Communication Education, 30, 109-121.
6.
Cegala, D. J.,Savage, G. T. , Brunner, C. C., & Conrad, A. B. (1982). An elaboration of the meaning of interaction involvement: Toward the development of a theoretical concept. Communication Monographs, 49, 229-248.
7.
Cegala, D. J. , & Sillars, A. L. (1989). Further examination of nonverbal manifestations of interaction involvement. Communication Reports, 2, 39-47.
8.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1990). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Communication Studies, 41, 212-236.
9.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1991). Communication in small group discussions: An integrated approach (3rd ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.
10.
DeStephen, R. S. (1983). Group interaction differences between high and low consensus groups. The Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 340-363.
11.
DeStephen, R. S. , & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Small group consensus: Stability of group support of the decision, task process, and group relationships. Small Group Behavior, 19, 227-239.
12.
Dorfman, P. W. , & Stephan, W. G. (1984). The effects of group performnance on cognitions, satisfaction, and behavior: A process model. Journal of Management, 10, 173-192.
13.
Downs, V. C. , & Javidi, M. (1990). Linking communuication motives to loneliness in the lives of older adults: An empirical test of interpersonal needs and gratifications. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 18, 32-48.
14.
Evans, C. R. , & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: Ameta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
15.
Graham, E. E. , Barbato, C. A., & Perse, E. M. (1993). The interpersonal communication motives model. Communication Quarterly, 41, 172-186.
16.
Hare, A. P. (1980). Consensus versus majority vote: A laboratory experiment. Small Group Behavior, 11, 131-143.
17.
Hecht, M. L. (1978). Measurement of communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 4, 350-368.
18.
Hecht, M. L. , & Riley, P. (1985). A three-factor model of group satisfaction and consensus. Communication Research Reports, 2, 179-187.
19.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1982). Consensus group decision making, quality of decision, and group satisfaction: An attempt to sort "fact" from "fiction."Central States Speech Journal, 33, 408-415.
20.
Hosman, L. A. (1991). The relationships among need for privacy, loneliness, conversational sensitivity, and interpersonal communication motives. Communication Reports, 4, 73-80.
21.
Jones, W. H. (1981). Loneliness and social contact. Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 295-296.
22.
Jones, W. H. (1982). Loneliness and social behavior. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 238-254). New York: Wiley.
23.
Jurma, W. E. (1978). Leadership structuring style, task ambiguity, and group member satisfaction. Small Group Behavior, 9, 124-133.
24.
Jurma, W. E. (1979). Effects of leader structuring style and task-orientation characteristics of group members. Communication Monographs, 46, 282-295.
25.
Leathers, D. G. (1972). Quality of group communication as a determinant of group product. Speech Monographs, 39, 166-173.
26.
Martin, M. M. (1992). The affinity-seeking process in initial interactions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, OH.
27.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion?Small Group Behavior, 20, 37-49.
28.
Pace, R. C. (1988). Communication patterns in highand low-consensus discussions: A descriptive analysis. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 53, 184-202.
29.
Parks, M. R. (1985). Interpersonal communication and the quest for personal competence. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 171-204). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
Pedhazur, E. J. (1982). Multiple regression in behavioral research. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
31.
Peplau, L. A. , & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. A. Peplau & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1-18). New York: Wiley.
32.
Perlman, D. , & Peplau, L. A. (1981). Toward a social psychology of loneliness. In S. Duck & R. Gilmour (Eds.), Personal relationships 3: Personal relationships in disorders. New York: Academic Press.
33.
Poole, M. S. (1990). Do we have any theories of group communication?Communication Studies, 41, 237-247.
34.
Putnam, L. L. , & Stohl, C. (1990). Bona fide groups: A reconceptualization of groups in context. Communication Studies, 41, 248-265.
35.
Rook, K. S. (1988). Toward a more differentiated view of loneliness. In S. Duck (Ed.), Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research, and interventions. New York: Wiley.
36.
Rosenfeld, L. B. , & Gilbert, J. R. (1989). The measurement of cohesion and its relationship to dimensions of self-disclosure in classroom settings. Small Group Behavior, 20, 291-301.
37.
Rubin, A. M. (1979). Television use by children and adolescents. Human Communication Research, 5, 109-120.
38.
Rubin, A. M. (1981). An examination of television viewing motivations. Communication Research, 8, 141-165.
39.
Rubin, R. B. (1990). Communication competence. In G. M. Phillips & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Speech communication: Essays to commemorate the 75th anniversay of the Speech Communication Association (pp. 94-129). Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
40.
Rubin, R. B. , Martin, M. M., Bruning, S. S., & Powers, D. E. (1993). Test of a self-efficacy model of interpersonal communication competence. Communication Quarterly, 41, 210-220.
41.
Rubin, R. B. , Perse, E. M., & Barbato, C. A. (1988). Conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication motives. Human Communication Research, 14, 602-628.
42.
Rubin, R. B. , & Rubin, A. M. (1992). Antecedents of interpersonal communication motivation. Communication Quarterly, 40, 305-317.
43.
Russell, D. , Peplau, L. A., & Cutrona, C. E. (1980). The revised UCLA loneliness scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 472-480.
44.
Saine, T. J. , & Bock, D. G. (1973). A comparison of the distributional and sequential structures of interaction in highand low-consensus groups. Central States Speech Journal, 24, 125-130.
45.
Schutz, W. C. (1966). The interpersonal underworld (2nd ed.). Palo Alto, CA: Science and Behavior Books.
46.
Spillman, B. , Bezdek, J., & Spillman, R. (1979). Development of an instrument for the dynamic measurement of consensus. Communication Monographs, 46, 1-12.
47.
Spitzberg, B. H. , & Canary, D. J. (1985). Loneliness and relational competence communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 2, 387-402.
48.
Spitzberg, B. H. , & Cupach, W. R. (1989). Handbook of interpersonal comnpetence researchNew York: Springer-Verlag.
49.
SPSS, Inc. (1988). SPSS-X introductory statistics guide. Chicago: Author.
50.
Stockton, R. , & Hulse, D. (1981). Developing cohesion in small groups: Theory and research, Journalfor Specialists in Group Work, 6, 188-195.
51.
Thomas, E. J. , & Fink, C. F. (1961). Models of group problem solving. Journal of Abnornal and Social Psychology, 63, 53-63.
52.
Weinberg, S. B. (1979). Measurement of communication aspects of group cohesion. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 8, 55-60.
53.
Zakahi, W. R. , & Duran, R. L. (1982). All the lonely people: The relationship among loneliness, communicative competence, and communication anxiety. Communication Quarterly, 30, 203-209.
54.
Zakahi, W. R. , & Duran, R. L. (1985). Loneliness, communicative competence, and communication apprehension: Extension and replication. Communication Quarterly, 33, 50-60.
