The Group Size-Cohesion Relationship in Minimal Groups

Abstract

Four studies were undertaken to investigate the relationship between cohesion and group size in exercise groups. Study 1 compared the perceptions of cohesiveness of members of small and large exercise classes assessed in the eighth week of group development in a 13-week session. Study 2 compared the perceptions of cohesiveness of members of small and large exercise classes assessed in the third week of group development in a 13-week session. Study 3 used a longitudinal design to assess the possible changes in perceptions of cohesiveness of members of small and large groups over time. The purpose of Study 4 was to determine how an intervention program focusing on team-building principles would influence perceptions of cohesiveness in small and large exercise classes. It was concluded that perceptions of task and social cohesion are greater in smaller groups, and that a team-building program can offset the negative impact of increased group size.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ailport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Brawley, L. R. (1990). Group cohesion: Status, problems, and futuredirections. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 355-379.

Brawley, L. R. , Carron, A. V. , & Widmeyer, W. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validity of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 9, 275-294.

Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sport groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.

Carron, A. V. (1990). Group size in sport and physical activity: Social psychological and performance consequences. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 21, 286-304.

Carron, A. V. , Brawley, L. R. , & Widmeyer, W. N. (1990). The impact of group size in an exercise setting. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 376-387.

Carron, A. V. , & Spink, K. S. (1992). Internal consistency of the Group Environment Questionnaire modified for an exercise setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 74, 1075-1078.

Carron,A. V. , & Spink, K. S. (1993). Teambuildinginanexercise setting. SportPsychologist, 7, 8-18.

Carron, A. V. , Widmeyer, W. N. , & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of aninstrument to measure cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.

10.

Carron, A. V , Widmeyer, W. N. , & Brawley, L. R. (1988). Group cohesion and individual adherence in physical activity. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 127-138.

11.

Eitzen, D. S. (1973). The effect of group structure on the success of athletic teams. International Review of Sport Sociology, 8, 7-16.

12.

Eoyang, C. K. (1974). Effects of group size and privacy in residential crowding. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 389-392.

13.

Hare, A. P. (1981). Group size. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 695-708.

14.

Munfell, A. J. , & Gaertner, S. L. (1992). Cohesion and sport team effectiveness: The benefit of a common group identity. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 16, 1-14.

15.

Rosenfeld, L. B. , & Gilbert, J. R. (1989). The measurement of cohesion and its relationship to dimensions of self-disclosure in classroom settings. Small Group Behavior, 20, 291-301.

16.

Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics (3rd. ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

17.

Spink, K. S. (1992). Group cohesion and starting status in successful and less successful elite volleyball teams. Journal of Sport Sciences, 10, 379-388.

18.

Spink, K. S. , & Caffon, A. V. (1992). Group cohesion and adherence in exercise classes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 14, 78-86.

19.

Spink, K. S. , & Caffon, A. V. (1993). The effects of team building on the adherence patterns of female exercise participants. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15, 39-49.

20.

Spink, K. S. , & Carron, A. V. (1994). Group cohesion effects in exercise classes. Small Group Research, 25, 26-42.

21.

Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group processes and productivity. New York: Academic Press.

22.

Tatsuoka, M. M. (1971). Multivariate analysis: Techniques for educational and psychological research. New York: Wiley.

23.

Thomas, E. J. , & Fink, C. F. (1963). Effects of group size. Psychological Bulletin, 60, 377-384.

24.

Trist, E. L. , & Bamforth, K. W. (1951). Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of goal-getting. Human Relations, 4, 3-38.

25.

Tuckman, B. W. , & Jensen, M.A.C. (1977). Stages of small group development revisited. Group and Organizational Studies, 2, 419-427.

26.

Widmeyer, W. N. , Brawley, L. R. , & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sport teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Ont.: Sports Dynamics.

27.

Widmeyer, W. N. , Brawley, W. N. , & Carron, A. V. (1990). The effects of group size in sports. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 177-190.

28.

Zander, A. (1982). Making groups effective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.