Although writers frequently suggestfuture directionsfor small group research, it is not clear to what extent these suggestions arise from participant concerns rather than researcher interests. Not always do the concerns of scholars coincide with the needs of the user. This article presents a participant-generated agendafor small group research that is constructed from a structural analysis of influence maps developed by seven groups overa 6-yearperiod. Each of these groups was engaged in the generation, structuring, and interpretation of difficulties related to group work. A multistage influence model of barriers to group problem solving is developedfrom the group products, and suggestions are made forfuture research directions based on this modeL Thefollowing agenda is proposed: (a) we must examine more carefully the role of contextual influences in group work (b) we need to provide stronger guidance on methodologies for group work, (c) we must find ways to fully integrate discussions of culture with group process, (d) we should view climate and communication as primary conduits of group interaction, (e) we need to conduct more research on how attitudes are influenced by group factors, and (f) we need to broaden our view of the role of process experts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackoff, R. (1979). Creating the corporate future. New York: Wiley.
2.
Alberts, H. (1992, December). Acquisition: Past, present andfuture. Paper presented at the national meeting of the Institute of Management Sciences and Operations Research Society, Orlando, FL.
3.
Argyris, C. (1982). Reasoning, learning, and action. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4.
Ashby, W. R. (1958). Requisite variety and its implications for the control of complex systems. Cybernetica, 1(2), 1-17.
5.
Bales, R. F. , & Strodbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46,485-495.
6.
Barmlund, D. C. , & Haiman, F. S. (1960). The dynamics of discussion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17, 345-381.
8.
Bormann, E. G. (1970). The paradox and promise of small group research. Communication Monographs, 37,211-217.
9.
Bormann, E. G. (1980). The paradox and promise of small group research revisited. Central States Speech Journal, 31, 214-220.
10.
Boulding, K. (1966). The impact of the social sciences. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
11.
Braybrooke, D. , & Lindblom, C. E. (1963). A strategy of decision. New York: Free Press.
12.
Brilhart, J. K. (1982). Effective group discussion. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
13.
Broome, B. J. (1994). The role of facilitated group process in community-based planning and design: Promoting greater participation in Comanche Tribal governance. In Lawrence R. Frey (Ed.), Innovations in group facilitation techniques: Applications in Natual Settings (pp.27-52). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
14.
Broome, B. J. , & Chen, M. (1992). Guidelines for computer-assisted group problem solving: Meeting the challenges of complex issues. Small Group Research, 23, 216-236.
15.
Broome, B. J. , & Christakis, A. N. (1988). A culturally sensitive approach to tribal governance issue management. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 107-123.
16.
Broome, B. J. , & Cromer, I. L. (1991). Strategic planning for tribal economic development: A culturally appropriate model for consensus building. International Journal of Conflict Management, 2, 217-234.
17.
Broome, B. J. , & Keever, D. B. (1989). Next generation group facilitation: Proposed principles. Management Communication Quarterly, 3, 107-127.
18.
Burgoon, J. K. (1976). The unwillingness to communicate scale: Development and validation. Communication Monographs, 43, 60-69.
19.
Christakis, A. N. (1985). High-technology participative design: The space-based laser. Proceedings of the Society for General Systems Research, 2, 925-933.
20.
Christakis, A. N. (1987). Systems profile: The Club of Rome revisited. Systems Research, 4, 53-58.
21.
Cleveland, H. (1973). The decision makers. The Center Magazine, 6(5), 9-18.
22.
Coke, J. G. , & Moore, C. M. (1981). Coping with a budgetary crisis: Helping a city council decide where expenditure cuts should be made. In S. W. Burks & J. F. Wolf (Eds.), Building city council leadership skills: A casebook of models and methods (pp. 72-85). Washington, DC: National League of Cities.
23.
Comadena, M. E. (1984). Brainstorming groups: Ambiguity, tolerance, communication apprehension, task attraction, and individual productivity. Small Group Behavior, 15, 251-254.
24.
Connolly, T. , Routhieaux, R. L., & Schneider, S. K. (1993). On the effectiveness of group brainstorming: Test of one underlying cognitive mechanism. Small Group Research, 24, 490-503.
25.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1980). Small group communication research of the 1970s: A synthesis and critique. Central States Speech Journal, 31, 197-213.
26.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1988, November). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association, New Orleans, LA.
27.
Cragan, J. F. , & Wright, D. W. (1990). Small group communication research of the 1980s: A synthesis and critique. Communication Studies, 41(3), 212-236.
28.
Deal, T. E. , & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
29.
Delbecq, A. L. , Van de Ven, A. H., &Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniquesforprogram planning: A guide to nominal group and DELPHIprocesses. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
30.
Diesling, P. (1967). Noneconomic decision-making. In M. Alexis & C. Z. Wilson (Eds.), Organizational decision making (pp. 185-200). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
31.
Etzioni, A. (1968). The entire society. New York: Free Press.
32.
Feeg, R. (1988). Forum of the future of pediatric nursing: Looking toward the 21st century. Pediatric Nursing, 14, 393-396.
33.
Fisher, B. A. , & Ellis, D. G. (1990). Small group decision making: Communication and the group process (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Flowers, M. L. (1977). A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 888-895.
35.
Friedman, P. G. (1989). Upstream facilitation: A proactive approach to managing problemsolving groups. Management Communication Quarterly, 3(1), 33-50.
36.
Galanes, G. J. , & Brilhart, J. K. (1991). Communicating in groups: Applications and skills. Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
37.
Gastil, J. (1993). Identifying obstacles to small group democracy. Small Group Research, 24(1), 5-27.
38.
Gordon, W.J.J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. New York: Harper & Row.
39.
Gouran, D. S. (1982). Making decisions in groups. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
40.
Gouran, D. S. , & Hirokawa, R. Y (1983). The role of communication in group decision making: A functional perspective. In M. S. Mander (Ed.), Communications in transition, (pp. 168-185). New York: Praeger.
41.
Gouran, D. S. , & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1986). Counteractive functions of communication in effective group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 81-90). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42.
Hackman, J. R. (1976). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 194-267). Chicago: Rand McNally.
43.
Hackman, J. R. , & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 45-99). New York: Academic Press.
44.
Hiltz, S. R. , Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
45.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: A test of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224.
46.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515.
47.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1990). The role of communication in group decision making efficacy: A task-contingency perspective. Small Group Research, 21, 190-204.
48.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1992). Communication and group decision-making efficacy. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 165-177). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
49.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , & Pace, R. (1983). A descriptive investigation of the possible communication-based reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 363-379.
50.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , & Scheerhorn, D. R. (1986). Communication in faulty group decision making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (pp. 63-80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
51.
Jablin, F. M. (1981). Cultivating imagination: Factors that enhance and inhibit creativity in brainstorning groups. Human Communication Research, 7, 245-258.
52.
Janis, I. L. (1982). GroupthinkBoston: Houghton Mifflin.
53.
Jessup, L. M. , & Valacich, J. S. (Eds.). (1993). Special issue on group support systems. Small Group Research, 24,427-583.
54.
Katz, D. , & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The socialpsychology of organizations (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
55.
Keever, D. B. (1989, April). Cultural complexities in the participative design of a computerbased organization information system. Paper presented at the International Conference on Support, Society, and Culture: Mutual Uses of Cybernetics and Science, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
56.
Kemeny, J. (1980). Saving American democracy: The lesson of Three Mile Island. Technology Review, 83(7), 64-75.
57.
Kepner, C. H. , & Tregoe, B. B. (1968). The rational manager A systematic approach to problem solving and decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
58.
Kirchmeyer, C. (1993). Multicultural task groups: An account of the low contribution level of minorities. Small Group Research, 24, 127-148.
59.
Leathers, D. G. (1972). Quality of group communication as a determinant of group product. Speech Monographs, 39, 166-173.
60.
Levine, J. M. , & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. In M. R. Rosenzweig, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Annual Review of Psychology, 4 (pp. 585-634). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews, Inc.
61.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of "muddling through."Public Administrative Review, 19, 79-88.
62.
Lustig, M. W. , & Cassotta, L. L. (1992). Comparing group communication across cultures: Leadership, conformity, and discussion processes. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 393-404). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
63.
Maier, N.R.F. (1963). Problem-solving discussions and conferences: Leadership methods and skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.
64.
March, J. G. , & Simon, H. A. (1958). Organizations. New York: Wiley.
65.
McBumey, J. H. , & Hance, K. G. (1950). Discussion in human affairs. New York: Harper & Row.
66.
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychology Review, 63, 81-97.
67.
Mintzberg, H. , Raisinghani, D., & Theoret, A. (1976). The structure of "unstructured" decision processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 246-275.
68.
Mischel, W. (1968). Personality and assessment. New York: Wiley.
69.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989, September). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42, 771-789.
70.
Pfiffner, J. M. (1960). Administrative rationality. PublicAdministrative Review, 20,125-275.
71.
Phillips, G. M. , Pedersen, D. J., & Wood, J. T. (1978). Group discussion: A practical guide to participation and leadership. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
72.
Poole, M. S. (1983). Decision development in small groups II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206-232.
73.
Poole, M. S. (1990). Do we have any theories of group communication?Communication Studies, 42(3), 237-247.
74.
Poole, M. S. (1992). Group communication and the structuring process. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 147-157). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
75.
Porter, R. E. , & Samovar, L. A. (1992). Communication in the multicultural group. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 382-392). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
76.
Prince, G. M. (1970). The practice of creativity. New York: Harper & Row.
77.
Putnam, L. L. (1988). Understanding the unique characteristics of groups within organizations. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 76-85). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
78.
Rickards, T. (1974). Problem solving through creative analysis. New York: Wiley.
79.
Rittel, H. , & Webber, M. (1974). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. DMG-DRS Journal, 8, 31-39.
80.
Rosenfield, L. B. (1992). Self-disclosure and small group interaction. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 326-341). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
81.
Sambamurthy, V. , Poole, M. S., & Kelly, J. (1993). The effects of variations in GDSS capabilities on decision-making processes in groups. Small Group Research, 24, 523-546.
82.
Sato, T. (1979). Determination of hierarchical networks of instructional units using the ISM method. Educational Technology Research, 3, 67-75.
83.
Scheidel, T. M. , & Crowell, L. (1979). Discussing and deciding. New York: Macmillan.
84.
Schwartzman, H. B. (1986). Research on work group effectiveness: An anthropological critique. In P. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Designing effective work groups (pp. 237-275). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
85.
Seashore, S. E. (1954). Group cohesiveness in the industrial work group. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
86.
Seibold, D. R. , & Myers, R. A. (1988, June). What has group research done for us lately? An expanded view of "Group Research" and prospects for the future. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New Orleans.
87.
Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
88.
Shaw, M. E. (1983). Group composition and group cohesiveness. In H. H. Blumbert, A.P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 1). New York: Wiley.
89.
Simon, H. A. (1960). The new science of management decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
90.
Simon, H. A. (1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
91.
Smith, H. W. (1981). Generalizing the scope of group problem-solving models. Central States Speech Journal, 32, 126-131.
92.
Spitzberg, B. H. (1992). Interpersonal competence in groups. In R. S. Cathcart & L. A. Samovar (Eds.), Small group communication: A reader (pp. 326-341). Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown.
93.
Staley, S., Warfield, J. N., & Broome, B. J. (in press). Designing a plan ofactionformanaging cultural issues associated with large-scale technical change. Manuscript submitted for publication. Ford Motor Company, Dearborn, MI.
94.
Stohl, C. (1987). Bridging the parallel organization: A study of quality circle effectiveness. In M. L. McLaughlin (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 10 (pp. 416-430). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
95.
Stymne, I. (1991). Cooperativeness and structuring of work in school groups. Small Group Research, 22, 421-442.
96.
Sykes, R. E. (1990). Imagining what we might study if we really studied small groups from a speech perspective. Communication Studies, 41(3), 200-211.
97.
Tinbergen, J. (1956). Economic policy: Principles and design. Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing.
98.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
99.
Warfield, J. N. (1976). Societal systems: Planning, policy, and complexity. New York: Wiley.
100.
Warfield, J. N. (1982). Organizations and systems learning. General Systems, 27, 5-74.
101.
Warfield, J. N. (1986). Domain of science model: Evolution and design. Proceedings of the Society for General Systems Research (pp. H46-H59). Salinas, CA: Intersystems.
102.
Warfield, J. N. (1990). A science of generic design: Managing complexity through systems design. Salinas, CA: Intersystems.
103.
Weich, K. E. (1985). The significance of corporate culture. In P. J. Frost, L. F. Moore, M. R. Louis, C. C. Lundbert, & J. Martin (Eds.), Organizational culture (pp. 381-390). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
104.
Wood, J. T. , Phillips, G. M., & Pedersen, D. J. (1986). Group discussion: A practical guide to participation and leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
