Altemeyer, B. (1981). Right-wing authoritarianism. Winnipeg, Manitoba: University of Manitoba Press.
2.
Altemeyer, B. (1988). Enemies offreedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3.
Brawley, L. R. , Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1987). Assessing the cohesion of teams: Validation of the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sports Psychology, 9, 275-294.
4.
Brawley, L. R. , Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and group resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 199-213.
5.
Campbell, D. T. , & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
6.
Carron, A. V. , Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7, 244-266.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
Dion, K. L. (1990). [Review of Enemies offreedom: Understanding right-wing authoritarianism.]Canadian Psychology, 31, 374-376.
9.
Dion, K. L. , Baron, R. S., & Miller, N. (1970). Why do groups make riskier decisions than individuals? In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental socialpsychology (Vol. 5, pp. 305-377). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10.
Eisman, B. (1959). Some operational measures of cohesiveness and their interrelations. Human Relations, 12, 183-189.
11.
Evans, C. R. , & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
12.
Evans, N. J. , & Jarvis, P. A. (1986). The group attitude scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17, 203-216.
13.
Griffith, J. (1988). Measurement of group cohesion in U.S. army units. Basic andApplied Social Psychology, 9, 149-171.
14.
Judd, C. M. , Jessor, R., & Donovan, J. E. (1986). Structural equation models and personality research. Journal of Personality, 54, 149-198.
15.
Kelly, L. , & Duran, R. L. (1985). Interactions and performance in smallgroups: Adescriptive report. International Journal of Small Group Research, 1, 182-192.
16.
Keyton, J. (1992). Response to Evans and Dion: Still more on group cohesion. Small Group Research, 23, 237-241.
17.
Keyton, J. , & Springston, J. (1990). Redefming cohesiveness in groups. Small Group Research, 21, 234-254.
18.
Miller, N. , & Rosenblatt, P. C. (1972). Problems and anxieties in research design and analysis. In C. McClintock (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 49-74). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
19.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989a). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 42, 771-785.
20.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989b). Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion?Small Group Behavior, 20, 37-49.
21.
Polley, R. B. (1985). A general theory of polarization and unification. International Journal of Small Group Research, 1, 150-161.
22.
Polley, R. B. , & Jessup, L. M. (1988, August). Beyond cohesiveness: Assessing group effectiveness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, Anaheim, CA.
23.
Sullivan, J. L. , & Feldman, S. (1979). Multiple indicators: An introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
24.
Wheeless, L. R. , Wheeless, V. E., & Dickson-Markman, F. (1982). A research note: The relations among social and task perceptions in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 13, 373-384.
25.
Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 387-399.
26.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 128, 547-558.
27.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & McCoy, M. C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive task.Journal ofApplied SocialPsychology, 18,837-851.