Bales, R. F. , & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
2.
Bird, A. M. (1977). Team structure and success as related to cohesiveness and leadership. Journal of Social Psychology, 103, 271-275.
3.
Evans, C. R. , & Dion, K. L. (1991). Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small Group Research, 22, 175-186.
4.
Evans, N. J. , & Jarvis, P. A. (1986). The group attitude scale: A measure of attraction to group. Small Group Behavior, 17, 203-216.
5.
Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 715-726.
6.
Kelly, L. , & Duran, R. L. (1985). Interactions and performance in small groups: Adescriptive report. International Journal of Small Group Research, 1, 182-192.
7.
Keyton, J. , & Springston, J. (1990). Redefining cohesiveness in groups. Small Group Research, 21, 234-254.
8.
Martens, R., Landers, D., & Loy, J. (1972). Sports Cohesiveness Questionnaire. Unpublished inventory. (Available from R. Martens, Department of Physical Education, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61801)
9.
Melnick, M. J. , & Chemers, M. M. (1974). Effects of group social structure on the success of basketball teams. Research Quarterly, 45, 2-8.
10.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion. Small Group Behavior, 20, 37-49.
11.
Polley, R. B. (1985). A general theory of polarization and unification. InternationalJournal of Small Group Research, 1, 150-161.
12.
Stogdill, R. M. (1965). Managers, employees, and organizations (Monograph No. 125). Columbus: Ohio State University Bureau of Business Research.
13.
Wheeless, L. R. , Wheeless, V. E., & Dickson-Markman, F. (1982). A research note: The relations among social and task perception in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 13, 373-384.
