Participation in Small Groups

Abstract

The effects of sex, age, socioeconomic status (SES), size, visibility, first-to-speak, and amount of participation in the first minute of agroup discussion on total participation rates were studied by means of path analysis. A total of 218 individuals, in 52 mock juries of size four, five, and six persons, were observed as they discussed a mandatory retirement case. An observer recorded the number of seconds each individual spoke. Visibility and size were the main predictors of who spoke first. First-to-speak, age, and sex were the main predictors of participation in the first minute. Total participation was most strongly affected by age, participation in the first minute, and sex; but size also had an effect on total participation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Baker, P.M. (1981). A simple encoding and recording system for small group interaction Behavior Research Methods and Instrumentation , 13(1), 67-69.

Baker, P.M. (1984). Seeing is behaving: Visibility and participation in small groups Environment and Behavior, 16, 159-184.

Bales, R.F. (1950). Interaction process analysis Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Bales, R.F. , Strodtbeck, F.L. , Mills, T.M. , & Roseborough, M.E. (1951). Channels of communication in small groups American Sociological Review, 16, 41-468.

Ball, D. (1973). Microecology: Social situations in intimate space Indianapolis: Bobbs Merrill.

Bass, B.M. (1954). The leaderless group discussion Psychological Bulletin, 51, 465-492.

Berger, J. , Conner, T.L. , & Fisek, M.H. (1974). Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program Cambridge, MA: Winthrop .

Burke, P.J. (1974). Participation and leadership in small groups American Sociological Review, 39 , 832-843.

Clegg, P.C. , & Clegg, A.G. (1969). Hormones, cells, and organisms Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

10.

Crosbie, P.F. (1979). The effects of sex and size on status ranking Social Psychology Quarterly, 42(4), 340-354.

11.

Fisek, M.H. , & Ofshe, R. (1970). The process of status evolution Sociometry, 33, 327-346.

12.

Fox, J. ( 1980). Effect analysis in structural equation models Sociological Methods and Research 9(1), 3-28.

13.

Hare, A.P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.

14.

Hearn, G. (1957). Leadership and the spatial factor in small groups Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 54, 269-272.

15.

Jaffee, C.L. , & R.L. Lucas. (1969). Effects of rates of talking and correctness of decisions on leader choice in small groups Journal of Social Psychology, 79, 247-254.

16.

Kahn, A. , Nelson, R.E. , Gaeddert, W.P. , & Hearn, J.L. (1982). The justice process: Deciding upon equity or equality Social Psychology Quarterly, 45(1), 3-8.

17.

Mullins, N.C. , & Mullins, C.J. (1973). Theories and theory groups in contemporary American sociology New York: Harper & Row.

18.

Riecken, H.W. (1958). The effect of talkativeness on ability to influence group solutions of problems Sociometry, 21, 309-321.

19.

Rosa, E. , & Mazur, A. (1979). Incipient status in small groups Social Forces, 58(1), 18-37.

20.

Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space: The behavioral basis of design Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall .

21.

Steinzor, B. (1950). The spatial factor in face to face discussion groups Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 45, 552-555.

22.

Strodtbeck, F.L. , & Hook, L.H. (1961). The social dimensions of a 12-man jury table Sociometry, 24, 397-415.

23.

van den Berghe, P.L. (1973). Age and sex in human societies: A bisocial perspective Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

24.

Ward, C.D. (1968). Seating arrangement and leadership emergence in small discussion groups Journal of Social Psychology , 74, 83-90.