This study investigates the severity of the sanctions group members recommend in judging socially proscribed acts in terms of the seriousness of the act, attribution of responsibility, and the status of the offender. The data were not totally consistent with the hypothesized relationships. As anticipated, moderately serious acts were sanc tioned less severely than those judged to be seriously deviant. Moreover, the greater the attribution of personal responsibility for the acts, the more severe the sanctions. Status, however, failed to reveal a mediating influence in the judgmental process under investigation. This appears to be the result of a loss ofstatus suffered by the high-status offender.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Asch, S.E. (1946) "Forming impressions of personality." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology41: 258-290.
2.
Davis, J.H., C.E. Spitzer, D.H. Nagao, and G. Stasser (1978) "Bias in social decisions by individuals and groups: an example from mock juries," pp. 33-52 in H. Brandstadder et al. (eds.) Dynamics of Group Decisions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
Dixon, W.J. (1968) Biomedical Computer Programs. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
4.
Edwards, A.L. (1957) Techniques of Attitude Scale Construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
5.
Gerson, L.W. (1967) "Punishment and position: the sanctioning of deviants in small groups." Case Western Reserve J. of Sociology1: 54-62.
6.
Harari, H. and J.W. Mcdavid (1969) "Situational influences on moral justice: a study of 'finking.' " J. of Personality and Social Psychology11: 240-244.
7.
Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Hollander, E.P. (1961) "Some effects of perceived status on responses to innovative behavior." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology63: 247-250.
9.
———( 1958) "Conformity, status, and idiosyncrasy credit." Psych. Rev.65: 117-127.
10.
Jones, E.E. and K.E. Davis (1965) "From acts to dispositions in person perception ," pp. 220-266 in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. II. New York: Academic.
11.
——— and K.J. Gergan (1961) "Role playing variations and their informational value for person perception." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology63: 302-310.
12.
Kaplan, M.F. (1977) "Judgment by juries," pp. 31-55 in M. F. Kaplan and S. Schwartz (eds.) Human Judgment and Decision Processes in Applied Settings. New York: Academic.
13.
Lindquist, E.F. (1953) Design and Analysis of Experiments in Psychology and Education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
Mudd, S.A. (1968) "Group sanction as a function of degree of behavior deviation and relevance of norm." J. of Personality and Social Psychology8: 258-260.
15.
Nisbett, R. and L. Ross (1980) Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Human Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
16.
Rokeach, M. and G. Rothman (1965) "The principle of belief congruence and the congruity principle as models of cognitive interaction." Psych. Rev.72: 128-142.
17.
Schacter, S. (1951) "Deviation, rejection, and communication." J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology46: 190-207.
18.
Schwartz, R.D. and J.H. Skolnick (1957) "Two studies in legal stigma." Social Problems10: 133-142.
19.
Sherif, M. and C.W. Sherif (1953) Groups in Harmony and Tension. New York: Harper & Row.
20.
Wahrman, R. (1977) "Status, deviance, sanctions, and group discussion ." Small Group Behavior8: 147-168.
21.
———( 1972) "Status, deviance, and sanctions: a critical review." Comparative Group Studies3: 485-504.
22.
———( 1970) "Status, deviance, and sanctions." Pacific Soc. Rev.13: 229-240.
23.
Walster, E., B. Walster, D. Abrahams, and Z. Brown (1966) "The effect of liking on overrating another." J. of Experimental Psychology2: 70-84.
24.
Wiggins, J., F. Dill, and R. Schwartz( 1965) "On 'status liability.'"Sociometry28: 197-209.
25.
Wyer, R.S. (1970) "The prediction of evaluations of social role occupants as a function of the favorableness, relevance, and probability associated with attributes of the occupants." Sociometry33: 79-96.
